Food for thought
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: San Fransisco
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just because this fool says it is so doesn't make it so.
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politi...19-gj2u2o.html
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politi...19-gj2u2o.html
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Toowoomba
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Climate change
Sunfish, you mean the world is laughing at us for buying in to this bs.
Any actual Earth scientists/oceanographers/geologists/meteorologists here who actually have the training and knowledge to have a legitimate opinion on "climate change"?
Any actual Earth scientists/oceanographers/geologists/meteorologists here who actually have the training and knowledge to have a legitimate opinion on "climate change"?
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The East Anglia hacked emails "Climategate" had quite a few revaluations about exactly & explicitly how to modify the climate data to achieve the required outcome embedded as comments within the FORTRAN source code: Climatic Research Unit (CRU): CRU's Source Code: Climategate Uncovered.
I'm not denying there aren't problems with burning hydrocarbons, rather questioning the credibility of "scientific" process about this issue. Your experts can still have agenda's & biases. Remember Global Cooling?
Under The Dome highlights some of the massive issues burning hydrocarbons to humans.
I'm not denying there aren't problems with burning hydrocarbons, rather questioning the credibility of "scientific" process about this issue. Your experts can still have agenda's & biases. Remember Global Cooling?
Under The Dome highlights some of the massive issues burning hydrocarbons to humans.
