2015 Employee Engagement Results

[ALAEA Fed Sec]

Hey all. Results are out for our 2015 employee engagement survey. This is a yearly thing we do and rather than do what Qf do and just hand pick a few questions with high answers, we measure them all to get a real engagement score. Remember these questions are virtually the same ones asked by the professional companies that run company surveys.


Qantas overall are up from 31% to 37%. Pilots sit at 31%, FAs at 35% and Engineers at 39%.


Virgin slowly declining each year to now sit at 54% overall. Pilots 46%, FAs 49%, 56%, others a bit higher...


Tiger had enough responses to make the ladder coming in at 45% but Air New Zealand didn't qualify. From what I can see though they appear a bit happier than last year.


Other results are as posted. Thanx to all who took time to contribute.

[SOPS]

Shows how bad things are at EK

[RU/16]

How about a list of how many responses you had from each airline. Cobham is not very big compared to emirates or Qantas. This can skew outcomes.Lies and statistics.

[Snakecharma]

I think the shine has worn off at one major domestic carrier.

The great white hope had fallen short of the hurdle unfortunately.

That would be why it had dropped each year in the rankings..

[Wobby]

Don't believe the Q-link figure, there wouldn't be enough interest there fill out the form

[Going Nowhere]

Plus next year a fair few ex-QLink ppl will be able to vote on how good/bad Cathay and Virgin are.

[Blitzkrieger]

Plus next year a fair few ex-QLink ppl will be able to vote on how good/bad Cathay and Virgin are.

A fair few Cobham (717) people are going to have to vote on how bad Qlink are next year too.

[tipsy2]

There can't have been too many reply from CHC to achieve that rating.

Tipsy

[noclue]

Isn't this just the opposite of NPS score?

The unhappy pax have moved on, leaving only the neutral and positive reporters.
The happy employees are either on leave (when they wanted) or don't need to tell everyone they are happy, while the unhappy ones are here.

Either way you get a negative, not a true picture

[ALAEA Fed Sec]

Tipsy2 - The responses were collected prior to CHC announcing redundancies. If taken now I think it may be a little lower.

[Avid Aviator]

Steve, are the above figures "all employees" or only LAMES?
Thanks.

[swh]

Originally Posted by ALAEA Fed Sec

Air New Zealand didn't qualify.

Do they come in under Other Companies ? don't see CASA, Jetconnect, Qantas Freight either.

[ALAEA Fed Sec]

Figures are for all Employees guys not just LAMEs.


ANZ, CASA, QF freight each did not have enough individual responses to qualify as a reasonable sample of employees. All the ones that did not qualify go into the "others" category.