Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

2015 Employee Engagement Results

Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

2015 Employee Engagement Results

Old 28th Jun 2015, 21:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,756
2015 Employee Engagement Results

Hey all. Results are out for our 2015 employee engagement survey. This is a yearly thing we do and rather than do what Qf do and just hand pick a few questions with high answers, we measure them all to get a real engagement score. Remember these questions are virtually the same ones asked by the professional companies that run company surveys.


Qantas overall are up from 31% to 37%. Pilots sit at 31%, FAs at 35% and Engineers at 39%.


Virgin slowly declining each year to now sit at 54% overall. Pilots 46%, FAs 49%, 56%, others a bit higher...


Tiger had enough responses to make the ladder coming in at 45% but Air New Zealand didn't qualify. From what I can see though they appear a bit happier than last year.


Other results are as posted. Thanx to all who took time to contribute.


ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2015, 23:52
  #2 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,888
Shows how bad things are at EK
SOPS is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 00:32
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: down south
Posts: 65
How about a list of how many responses you had from each airline. Cobham is not very big compared to emirates or Qantas. This can skew outcomes.Lies and statistics.
RU/16 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 02:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 542
I think the shine has worn off at one major domestic carrier.

The great white hope had fallen short of the hurdle unfortunately.

That would be why it had dropped each year in the rankings..
Snakecharma is online now  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 05:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 9
Don't believe the Q-link figure, there wouldn't be enough interest there fill out the form
Wobby is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 07:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 625
Plus next year a fair few ex-QLink ppl will be able to vote on how good/bad Cathay and Virgin are.
Going Nowhere is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 07:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Sand dune
Posts: 174
Plus next year a fair few ex-QLink ppl will be able to vote on how good/bad Cathay and Virgin are.
A fair few Cobham (717) people are going to have to vote on how bad Qlink are next year too.
Blitzkrieger is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 08:38
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 468
There can't have been too many reply from CHC to achieve that rating.

Tipsy
tipsy2 is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2015, 11:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 10'S 100'E
Age: 42
Posts: 99
Isn't this just the opposite of NPS score?

The unhappy pax have moved on, leaving only the neutral and positive reporters.
The happy employees are either on leave (when they wanted) or don't need to tell everyone they are happy, while the unhappy ones are here.

Either way you get a negative, not a true picture
noclue is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2015, 21:21
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,756
Tipsy2 - The responses were collected prior to CHC announcing redundancies. If taken now I think it may be a little lower.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2015, 09:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Expat land
Posts: 179
Steve, are the above figures "all employees" or only LAMES?
Thanks.
Avid Aviator is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2015, 11:56
  #12 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 1,922
Originally Posted by ALAEA Fed Sec
Air New Zealand didn't qualify.
Do they come in under Other Companies ? don't see CASA, Jetconnect, Qantas Freight either.
swh is online now  
Old 12th Jul 2015, 08:20
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,756
Figures are for all Employees guys not just LAMEs.


ANZ, CASA, QF freight each did not have enough individual responses to qualify as a reasonable sample of employees. All the ones that did not qualify go into the "others" category.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.