PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   2015 Employee Engagement Results (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/563713-2015-employee-engagement-results.html)

ALAEA Fed Sec 28th Jun 2015 21:02

2015 Employee Engagement Results
 
Hey all. Results are out for our 2015 employee engagement survey. This is a yearly thing we do and rather than do what Qf do and just hand pick a few questions with high answers, we measure them all to get a real engagement score. Remember these questions are virtually the same ones asked by the professional companies that run company surveys.


Qantas overall are up from 31% to 37%. Pilots sit at 31%, FAs at 35% and Engineers at 39%.


Virgin slowly declining each year to now sit at 54% overall. Pilots 46%, FAs 49%, 56%, others a bit higher...


Tiger had enough responses to make the ladder coming in at 45% but Air New Zealand didn't qualify. From what I can see though they appear a bit happier than last year.


Other results are as posted. Thanx to all who took time to contribute.


http://i57.tinypic.com/2rnu175.jpg

SOPS 28th Jun 2015 23:52

Shows how bad things are at EK

RU/16 29th Jun 2015 00:32

How about a list of how many responses you had from each airline. Cobham is not very big compared to emirates or Qantas. This can skew outcomes.Lies and statistics.

Snakecharma 29th Jun 2015 02:58

I think the shine has worn off at one major domestic carrier.

The great white hope had fallen short of the hurdle unfortunately.

That would be why it had dropped each year in the rankings..

Wobby 29th Jun 2015 05:28

Don't believe the Q-link figure, there wouldn't be enough interest there fill out the form:mad:

Going Nowhere 29th Jun 2015 07:04

Plus next year a fair few ex-QLink ppl will be able to vote on how good/bad Cathay and Virgin are. :E

Blitzkrieger 29th Jun 2015 07:44


Plus next year a fair few ex-QLink ppl will be able to vote on how good/bad Cathay and Virgin are.
A fair few Cobham (717) people are going to have to vote on how bad Qlink are next year too. :}

tipsy2 29th Jun 2015 08:38

There can't have been too many reply from CHC to achieve that rating.

Tipsy:rolleyes:

noclue 30th Jun 2015 11:57

Isn't this just the opposite of NPS score?

The unhappy pax have moved on, leaving only the neutral and positive reporters.
The happy employees are either on leave (when they wanted) or don't need to tell everyone they are happy, while the unhappy ones are here.

Either way you get a negative, not a true picture

ALAEA Fed Sec 2nd Jul 2015 21:21

Tipsy2 - The responses were collected prior to CHC announcing redundancies. If taken now I think it may be a little lower.

Avid Aviator 6th Jul 2015 09:33

Steve, are the above figures "all employees" or only LAMES?
Thanks.

swh 6th Jul 2015 11:56


Originally Posted by ALAEA Fed Sec
Air New Zealand didn't qualify.

Do they come in under Other Companies ? don't see CASA, Jetconnect, Qantas Freight either.

ALAEA Fed Sec 12th Jul 2015 08:20

Figures are for all Employees guys not just LAMEs.


ANZ, CASA, QF freight each did not have enough individual responses to qualify as a reasonable sample of employees. All the ones that did not qualify go into the "others" category.


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:44.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.