Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Virgin Aircraft 'Emergency' Landing

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Virgin Aircraft 'Emergency' Landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 08:05
  #721 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Couldn't agree more 'A2' but it's often the fear factor of sending out a "Oh Bugga" call of any denomination as that implies a level of perhaps....."****e I've stuffed this up"... in some cases followed by the usual paper work, tea & bickies in a "Just Culture" environment...cough cough cough!

There's Med 1 used when it's obvious that urgent passage is required, you get priority except where an A/C is in danger (or Kev07 is inbound)Med 2 less urgent usually reserved for the transportation or returning of medical personal.
Pan & Mayday, both achieve/receive the appropriate responses when used in the context of the included message IE: PANx2 PANx2 PANx2, Eng failure etc. Or MDx2MDx2MDx2 Engine fire etc.
If in doubt use MAYDAY, you can always downgrade to PAN if you get the fire out for Eg or the threat is no longer of imminent danger.
As for low fuel & a level of urgency needs to be conveyed to all out there a PAN absolutely should be used I believe with a follow up Mayday when it becomes critical.
No pilot likes to use these terminologies we all know that but going by the book at the very least covers a certain section of yr ass that's hangin' out there !

Wmk2

Last edited by Wally Mk2; 23rd Jul 2013 at 08:07. Reason: the usual suspect, pore speeling:-)
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 08:27
  #722 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Moved beyond
Posts: 1,175
Received 89 Likes on 50 Posts
What's all this nonsense about declaring "Medevac" or "Hospital"? Surely an in-flight medical emergency requiring urgent assistance and priority for landing would warrant a PAN call at the very least? If someone's about to die then a MAYDAY might even be appropriate.

Last edited by BuzzBox; 23rd Jul 2013 at 08:28.
BuzzBox is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 08:41
  #723 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wally 2 said:

"As for low fuel & a level of urgency needs to be conveyed to all out there a PAN absolutely should be used I believe with a follow up Mayday when it becomes critical.
No pilot likes to use these terminologies we all know that"

Sorry Wal...I didn't know that and never have!

Wally 2 also said:

" but going by the book at the very least covers a certain section of yr ass that's hangin' out there !"

Which means what Wal?...only apply SOPs when it suits you 'cause most of the time you know better?

I don't think you get my drift after all, Wally!
amos2 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 08:59
  #724 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you declare minimum fuel you'll be asked for your latest divert time from either the pattern or the field. You'll be then sequenced appropriately with no delay. In 23 years of ATC I've never heard of other aircraft being asked to surrender slots, the ATC that allegedly did this must have been suffering a mental breakdown?

It's medevac & hosp priority now. Whenever aircraft have advised a sick pax on board, I don't give a flying you know what whether you've declared medevac or not. You'll get priority, I tell the flow & I've never, ever had a flow insist on the aircraft declaring a phase before being processed with priority.

Over the years I've had several pans & one mayday. I've had several calls that should have been pans & maydays but those words weren't spoken. Phases were declared by ATC's, their supervisors etc because 'common sense' was used. I've had an A320 return to departure point because of 'control issues'. 'Are ops normal'? 'Affirm' was the answer. Do you think a phase wasn't declared? If ops are normal why are you returning to destination?

A question for the techie's, are you being advised not declare pans? If you are not, why aren't you declaring a pan if it clearly is?
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 09:09
  #725 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Doomadgee
Posts: 282
Received 48 Likes on 26 Posts
Wally- The radio procedures for minimum fuel calls have changed since late 2012.
In a nut shell - If you think you will go below Fixed reserves you call "Minimum Fuel". If you know you are going below - you call "Mayday". Pan call is not now utilised in a min fuel situation.

Here is a link to the IFALPA brief on the matter for you.

http://aviation.osu.edu/wp-content/u...gency-fuel.pdf

Last edited by Capn Rex Havoc; 23rd Jul 2013 at 11:03.
Capn Rex Havoc is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 09:19
  #726 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Doomadgee
Posts: 282
Received 48 Likes on 26 Posts
Jack-
I've had an A320 return to departure point because of 'control issues'. 'Are ops normal'? 'Affirm' was the answer. Do you think a phase wasn't declared? If ops are normal why are you returning to destination?
There may have been some unserviceablity that is not a not worthy of a PAN (i.e. no priority assistance needed) eg a Prim fault on an airbus, which is unable to be reset. The company may wish the aircraft to be returned to the departure field as maintenance at an outstation may not be available, or, the fault means that with degraded spoiler operation perhaps landing distance available at the destination is not suitable and it is not feasible to continue to destination. There are a lot of variables at play.
Capn Rex Havoc is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 09:45
  #727 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair enough it would help if we had information to that effect though!
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 10:16
  #728 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's all in your Operations Manual, Jack! I suggest you read it!
amos2 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 11:27
  #729 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tnxs 'rexy' I am aware of mentioning Min Fuel to the guy on the other end of the 'string' (Radio) does mean that yr committed to yr destination & that further delay would impinge on final res's that's been around for a while. I read the rest tnxs & am now more informed
Also 'rexy' that's a good explanation of the 'Ops Normal'

'Amos' yep SOP's for me are "Supplementary Operating Procedures", I only use them as a supplement, additional info as I don't know everything but am working on itYr right 'A2' am not heading in yr direction yr 2 clever 4 me


Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 14:17
  #730 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
amos2, I'm an ATC not a pilot (well, a charter one not an RPT) I'm well aware of what's in our ops manual bro! 'Control issues' aren't mentioned in it. Reading your mind isn't part of our aptitude test, neither am I able to see you nodding your head in the cockpit

Last edited by Jack Ranga; 23rd Jul 2013 at 14:21.
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 19:47
  #731 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
Do any of you blokes ever read your companies Operations Manuals and apply SOPs as per the manuals? It's all there, you know.
I sure do but it's not all there, in fact, it's silent on the medical issue. I wouldn't be surprised if other pilots are also let down by the
people far smarter than you or I
framer is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 20:57
  #732 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Go west young man
Posts: 1,733
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jack question for you?

At ASA is Amendment 36 to ICAO Annex 6 Part I Chapter 4 (see below) the recognised accepted procedure here in Oz for cases of min fuel?
Chapter 4
4.3.7 In-flight fuel management
4.3.7.1 An operator shall establish policies and procedures, approved by the State of the Operator, to ensure that in-flight fuel
checks and fuel management are performed.
4.3.7.2 The pilot-in-command shall continually ensure that the amount of usable fuel remaining on board is not less than the fuel


required to proceed to an aerodrome where a safe landing can be made with the planned final reserve fuel remaining upon land
ing.
4.3.7.2.1 The pilot-in-command shall request delay information from ATC when unanticipated circumstances may result in
landing at the destination aerodrome with less than the final reserve fuel plus any fuel required to proceed to an alternate aero


drome
or the fuel required to operate to an isolated aerodrome.
4.3.7.2.2 The pilot-in-command shall advise ATC of a minimum fuel state by declaring MINIMUM FUEL when, having
committed to land at a specific aerodrome, the pilot calculates that any change to the existing clearance to that aerodrome may
result in landing with less than planned final reserve fuel.
Note 1.— The declaration of MINIMUM FUEL informs ATC that all planned aerodrome options have been reduced to a
specific aerodrome of intended landing and any change to the existing clearance may result in landing with less than planned
final reserve fuel. This is not an emergency situation but an indication that an emergency situation is possible should any additional
delay occur.
Note 2.— Guidance on declaring minimum fuel is contained in the Fuel Planning Manual (Doc 9976).
It should be noted that Pilots should not expect any form of priority handling as a result of a “MINIMUM FUEL” decla


ration.

ATC will, however, advise the flight crew of any additional expected delays as well as coordinate when transferring
control of the aeroplane to ensure other ATC units are aware of the flight’s fuel state.
4.3.7.2.3 The pilot-in-command shall declare a situation of fuel emergency by broadcasting MAYDAY, MAYDAY, MAYDAY,
FUEL, when the calculated usable fuel predicted to be available upon landing at the nearest aerodrome where a safe landing
can be made is less than the planned final reserve fuel.
Note 1.— The planned final reserve fuel refers to the value calculated in 4.3.6.3 e) 1) or 2) and is the minimum amount of fuel
required upon landing at any aerodrome.
Note 2.— The words “MAYDAY FUEL” describe the nature of the distress conditions as required in Annex 10, Volume II,
5.3.2.1, b) 3.

Note 3.— Guidance on procedures for in-flight fuel management are contained in the Fuel Planning Manual (Doc
9976).
Or should I say is the above what you as an ATC expect or understand should happen when an aircraft declares min fuel?

Sarcs is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 22:02
  #733 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 538
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Min fuel etc was issued as a national instruction about a year or so ago, same as what is now in AIP
topdrop is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2013, 22:12
  #734 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Inside their OODA loop
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info Sarcs. Whilst looking for that I found this one too, haven't made it that far through but worth a look: ICAO Flight Planning and Fuel Management Manual.
FYSTI is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2013, 02:24
  #735 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: OZ
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 2 Posts
Interesting thread running on Fragrant Harbour relating to KA's fuel policy

http://www.pprune.org/fragrant-harbo...s-low-gas.html
Buckshot is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2013, 05:34
  #736 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: S37.54 E145.11
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In Flight Updating

There is an aspect of this incident which does not appear to have been discussed in this thread and it really is the "elephant in the room"; and the question that sticks out in my mind is
How is it that the Virgin flight crew only became aware of the fog at YPAD when at TOPD at approximately 2300Z?
This raises questions as to what procedures Virgin has in place to ensure pilots are updated on changing weather/NOTAMs once they have completed flight planning and now in flight, and also how effective those procedures are in practice. In the preliminary ATSB report, it is mentioned that the crew of VYK were advised by their company (through ACARS) that YPAD required an ALTN within 20 minutes of their departure from YSSY, which gave more time for consideration of ALTN options. I would propose that Virgin's late awareness of the need to hold an ALTN for YPAD may have limited the options available to them for a suitable ALTN.

Furthermore, it is also noted that both the Virgin and Qantas crews did not appear (according to the ATSB report) to be notified by anyone that MIA had also gone into SPECI at 2318Z after both aircraft had notified their intentions to divert to MIA.

So which agency holds responsibility for inflight updating of airline flight crews, particularly for significant weather changes - is it airline operational control, ATC or the pilots themselves through utilisation of Flightwatch services?

Looking forward to hearing from anyone who can enlighten me as to how inflight updating works for both Virgin and Qantas.
QSK? is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2013, 05:56
  #737 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,557
Received 75 Likes on 43 Posts
Airservices is obliged to provide a Flight information Service, at least according to an oldish version of ICAO Annex 11 Chapter 4 I have. It seems as though someone has decided that "within one hour of destination" is good enough (AIP GEN 3.3, 2.1.1). One hour is not mentioned in the ICAO doc.
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 24th Jul 2013, 06:21
  #738 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
So does that mean that Air Services complied with the " within one hour" or that they didn't comply?
framer is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2013, 06:51
  #739 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: S37.54 E145.11
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, Capn, you're right about ICAO requirements re the provision of FIS.

However, Airservices/CASA changed the rules on FIS some years ago by moving away from the situation whereby ATC had the responsibility for providing a directed FIS to aircraft in flight to one whereby the pilot was responsible for obtaining inflight FIS updates through the "self-help" Flightwatch system.

Interestingly, this change from ICAO SARPs does not appear in AIP SUP H12/11 as a listed Australian difference from the ICAO standards.
QSK? is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2013, 08:11
  #740 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
However, Airservices/CASA changed the rules on FIS some years ago by moving away from the situation whereby ATC had the responsibility for providing a directed FIS to aircraft in flight to one whereby the pilot was responsible for obtaining inflight FIS updates through the "self-help" Flightwatch system.
Talk about abdicating responsibility!!!!!!!

Who in their right mind would knowingly not pass on critical information like this.

This situation just highlights how stupid that policy is? The crew had no reason to ask and therefore were never told.

I'd like to see how it might play out in court.

"You knew about this critical information but never bothered to pass it on?"

"They never asked My Lud"

27/09 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.