Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

QLINK to get a new Manager Standards and Development (CAR 217 leadership)

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QLINK to get a new Manager Standards and Development (CAR 217 leadership)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Oct 2012, 15:12
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: shoe box
Posts: 380
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You guys are obviously not aware that turbo prop pilots can't fly jets. Just check the court records, it's a proven fact!
Sue Ridgepipe is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2012, 22:59
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: herethereandeverywhere
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does jet-like count?
bddbism is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2012, 04:08
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: flyville
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any body with experience on fast modern turbo-props is well placed to move to a jet. Some aspects are easier, some harder. Refer to posts #37 & #38, it's the standard of trainning & attitude of the candidate that counts.

If you want to fly a jet, join a company thats already operating them!
R.Cruizo is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2012, 07:17
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tin Shed corner Bourke and Swanston
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No matter what it will always be jet-like speed, piston like pay
startingout is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2012, 08:59
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Living next door to Alan
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

That's MY catchphrase, startingout. Get your own

The reality is that Cobham is the jet operator for QLink;
Their contract has been renewed for a significant time into the future (including the timeframe in which the C-Series may be introduced); (Bloggs won't like the side-stick because it's like a bow-thruster on a boat).
Any new type is a REPLACEMENT for the 717 (Cobham);
The jet clause in your EBA is purely an effort to force Cobham to sharpen their pencils at contract negotiation time. QLink management NEVER intended EAA or SA to operate jets. God, they made the Q400 a space shuttle - imagine what their first jet would do to you guys.

Normasars: Don't bang your head against the wall mate. All you'll do is hurt yer head (as I do)

It's a big world out there. Like R.Cruizo wrote: If you want to fly a jet - join a company that operates them

Last edited by Hugh Jarse; 23rd Oct 2012 at 09:00.
Hugh Jarse is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2012, 10:15
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 77
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"You guys are obviously not aware that turbo prop pilots can't fly jets. Just check the court records, it's a proven fact!"

That's funny cause I'm pretty sure a significant number of pilots at Virgin and Cathay Pacific are ex Qantaslink...
skysook is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2012, 11:45
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Suitcase
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turboprop guys are just the ones they want...

Everybody knows that Jet pilots feature almost exclusively in Jet hull-loss accidents. You won't find many turboprop guys crashing jets into the ground!

Turboprop pilots, by CRM logic, have an excellent safety record when it comes to this old topic.

I should know, I did this course about safety and there were some very persuasive pie charts.
WynSock is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2012, 23:55
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Beech or the Office.
Age: 14
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Skysook,

Sue was very tongue in cheek. He, like many of us have first hand knowledge on the not so subtle lack of progression from the QF Regionals to Mainline. I shared the same flight deck with him for a few years; top guy and operator.

The term sarcasm springs to mind.
Normasars is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2012, 06:12
  #49 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
fish

Skysook, you must be young if you don't know of the court case referred to. Tongue firmly in cheek with that line.
Keg is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2012, 21:18
  #50 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Relax chaps
The contract with Cobham to run the 717s till 2018 is just that, a contract to run the 717s till 2018. When that arrangement was put in place Qlink was structurally not in a position to bring in jets. At the moment they could do it quite easily by utilising expertise from elsewhere in the QF group and from targeted recruiting, which if they are to put jets in in 2016 would already be happening.

Every operator had to start somewhere and no group is better resourced than QF. One thing is for sure, you will never see the J* fleet repainted white with the rat on the tail. Perhaps they'll replacebthe 717s for Cobham and use Qlink on domestic routes with something bigger???

SN
PPRuNeUser0161 is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2012, 22:13
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eastside
Posts: 636
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Did SN say free crack giveaway?
grrowler is online now  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 10:51
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bottom of the Harbour
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Here it is boys!! This is the future, it will go well with the 'Great Wall' utes in the car park. Start practising putonghua for the manuals though, because the english translation won't make sense!

Here's the new Chief pilot, top bloke. Apparently loves KTV, rice wine and chicken feet!
http://www.chinavitae.com/photos/xu.qiliang.2236.jpg

Last edited by KABOY; 14th Nov 2012 at 11:05.
KABOY is online now  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 13:08
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts
My bet is Airbus A31x. 'Link' to be removed from livery, eventually start taking over QF 737 routes.

Last edited by theheadmaster; 14th Nov 2012 at 13:09.
theheadmaster is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 22:10
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: herethereandeverywhere
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sadly, the only jets qlink people will get to fly will be the ones at virgin and tiger. There are a lot of experienced qantas pilots who will be without a job over the coming years and it only makes sense to keep that experience in house (albeit on a much lower wicket). All we can hope is that where ever the jets go, the pilot council has the balls to not get starry eyed and sell out.
Big brother usually gets first pick of the new toys anyway
bddbism is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 23:25
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In a pipe in the upstairs water closet
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
There are a lot of experienced qantas pilots who will be without a job over the coming years and it only makes sense to keep that experience in house
Tell that to the boys and girls who have left QF for EK, taking all that 'in house' experience you mention.

Tell that to the HUNDREDS of engineers been shown the door because the company values experience.

Big brother usually gets first pick of the new toys anyway
Didn't hear one peep from mainline saying 'we want the Q400s' when they first arrived in '06. Now that we near 30 Q400 airframes (with more on the way) I'm hearing whispers from some senior mainline FOs they want an MoU like they have with JQ, (and that's keeping up the morale of the JQ drivers! ) in order to get a command because we all know what the command potential is like at QF at the moment...

Mainline's sense of entitlement over the entire group is sickening. If you want to join QLink, happy to welcome you - at the bottom of the seniority like everyone else.

Fuel-Off
Fuel-Off is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2012, 00:43
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts
hearing whispers from some senior mainline FOs
equates to
Mainline's sense of entitlement over the entire group
is a long bow to draw.

There is not a sense of entitlement, there is a sense of disappointment that transfer of business is being used to erode conditions for all employees.

The desire of some to protect their own small patch of turf is an attitude that will be instrumental in reducing working conditions for all pilots in this country.

Last edited by theheadmaster; 15th Nov 2012 at 00:44.
theheadmaster is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2012, 01:48
  #57 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

I'm hearing whispers from some senior mainline FOs they want an MoU like they have with JQ, (and that's keeping up the morale of the JQ drivers! ) in order to get a command because we all know what the command potential is like at QF at the moment...
'Senior mainline F/Os' are senior enough to have a command given that 'senior mainline F/Os' are mostly senior to me. Given they've not bid for a 737 or 767 command (probably due to the pay cut or lifestyle drop) I can't see them bidding for a Q400 command. Massive pay drop and lifestyle change.

Junior mainline F/Os perhaps but they'd still be taking a decent pay cut to be a Q400 Captain.

With that in mind, I call 'bull****'. Not saying that you haven't heard the rumour, just saying that whoever started it hasn't spoken to a 'senior mainline F/O' or has a very distorted view of the world. Should also point out that PPRUNE is the first I've heard of it- not that me not hearing it doesn't make it true either but I would have heard murmurings of this one were there a shred of evidence to it.

If you want to join QLink, happy to welcome you - at the bottom of the seniority like everyone else.
If you were familiar with AIPAs statements relating to seniority, you'd already know that this is precisely what they've proposed previously. Equally, it'd apply to everyone.

So perhaps, just perhaps, this statement...

Mainline's sense of entitlement over the entire group is sickening.
.... is complete and utter BS.

Last edited by Keg; 15th Nov 2012 at 01:50.
Keg is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2012, 02:15
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: under a rock
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A SO in mainline would be taking a pay cut to be a captain in Qantaslink!!
bubble.head is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2012, 04:03
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Land of the rising sun
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and that's where the stupidity of pay winds us all up! Especially when an SO gets business class of staff travel these days. For doing what? What is your responsibility again....

Half you SO's have probably forgotten how to land an aircraft, so you can stay where you are, logging you useless P3 time!

If it is all about the money, then this industry as a whole is certainly the wrong one to pick these days!
yadot is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2012, 05:09
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: In the Trees
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 3 Posts
This rumour about jets for Qantaslink always seems to come up during the Qantas short haul EBA (or EA or whatever they call it this week) time. And guess what? They have just started negotiations for it. Its Qantas playing its usual tricks of one pilot body against another. It happens every time. I understand the J* EBA is up for renewal soon too. Qantaslink with narrow body jets and Airbus aircraft puts pressure on both pilot bodies during negotiations. The company just feeds the fire with rumours.

And gotta agree with Keg, there is no "sense of entitlement" in mainline, its just frustration at seeing a once proud company reduced to a shadow of its former self.....but thats another topic.
ANCDU is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.