Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Aviation Employee Survey

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jul 2012, 01:28
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny QLD
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brilliant work Steve the industry is lucky to have you .
ejectx3 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2012, 02:22
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks good!
Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2012, 04:31
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S33E151
Posts: 1,086
Received 59 Likes on 29 Posts
Looks and reads sensationally. Not bad for an illiterate and militant unionist

The crazy thing is, someone like you Steve, would not be out of place on the Board of any major airline - but one in particular would rather bankrupt itself than allow people with decades of real world experience in airlines formulate company policy. With any luck, this type of approach will prove to people that 'unionists' DO care VERY much about their companies future, and are not stupid enough to demand 70+% pay rises like their very 'company minded' leaders.

Reading that beats wearing a red tie to work!
V-Jet is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2012, 05:08
  #44 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You wouldn't want someone who is a little eager like me on a Board. You would need the likes of me in the engine room.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2012, 10:09
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The crazy thing is, someone like you Steve, would not be out of place on the Board of any major airline - but one in particular would rather bankrupt itself than allow people with decades of real world experience in airlines formulate company policy
The sad thing is that this is true, but even sadder( if there is such a word) is that it is not going to happen. There is no incentive for the people at the "top'" to try and get employees on board. You can whinge and complain all you like, in fact, you can be a share holder, and whinge and complain all you like, and it will make exactly no difference. It is true that AJ is only interested in HIS bottom line. If that is not the truth, tell us what is alan? ( my spell checker thought I needed a capital, but I dont think one is deserved).
Arnold E is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2012, 12:14
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Hmm strangely I can't view any of it!! Is there a different format it can be posted on?

Last edited by Night Hawk; 1st Jul 2012 at 12:16.
Night Hawk is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2012, 12:51
  #47 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its hard to post in other formats. May I suggest you try viewing the thread on a Mozilla Firefox browser?
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2012, 14:32
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
Typos:

Post 35, paragraph 6, "and those who custom the businesses". Custom needs to be replaced, perhaps with with "patronise", as it should be a verb.

post 37, line 1 and line 7, "employee's opinions" should read "employees' opinions" as it's plural.

Post 37 - Communication opening paragraph - "Informing employees of developments...etc" is not actually a sentence.

Overall it looks good Steve. Keep up the good work.

Last edited by DirectAnywhere; 1st Jul 2012 at 15:00.
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2012, 17:24
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vienna
Age: 50
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Steve,

looks good, congrats especially on the idea and apparent response you got and still get there (including some corporate fat cat flak apparently, which is almost a seal of quality IMHO).

Some minor remarks: in the (still black) figures of the draft you sent me, "Virgin" looked as if it was written with two "i"s at the end, and not sure whether citing some of the studies I sent you couldn't have substantiated the point that having engaged and committed employees affects not only individual but company performance, too. And I couldn't find absolute sample sizes anywhere (but may have simply missed it; in any case the response rate IMHO sure didn't look as if one needed to hide it). Otherwise, I am still not fully convinced by the dichotomous positive/negative classification and percentages, but we have discussed that already, and I am an industry outsider.

BTW, despite the already impressive results, from a data analysis point of view, I frankly think that the data you collected with this survey still hold several hidden gems. Nonetheless, IMHO that's an extremely valuable contribution and an important counterpoint to employee surveys conducted, endorsed, and presented by corporate management.

All the best to the other side of the globe,
Mike
Armchairflyer is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2012, 22:30
  #50 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post 35, paragraph 6, "and those who custom the businesses". Custom needs to be replaced, perhaps with with "patronise", as it should be a verb.

post 37, line 1 and line 7, "employee's opinions" should read "employees' opinions" as it's plural.

Post 37 - Communication opening paragraph - "Informing employees of developments...etc" is not actually a sentence.
My command of English is so basic that I cannot argue with these points thnx for the detail scrutiny and advice. Changes to be made.


Some minor remarks: in the (still black) figures of the draft you sent me, "Virgin" looked as if it was written with two "i"s at the end,
Yep was aware of this and has been fixed.

And I couldn't find absolute sample sizes anywhere
They won't be included because the numbers could be twisted very easily by airlines who don't like the results. eg. well, 1300 people from Qantas answered but only 20 did from airline X. But fail to mention that only 30 people work for airline X.

Otherwise, I am still not fully convinced by the dichotomous positive/negative classification and percentages, but we have discussed that already, and I am an industry outsider.
The numbers pages that come after the ones I have already posted have a bit of everything. Pos/Neg %, overall engagement and the 1-5 scale stuff. I think it is about presenting an overall picture of the industry in a story type manner primarily with the use of data. That's how I see it anyway.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2012, 10:26
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vienna
Age: 50
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And I couldn't find absolute sample sizes anywhere.
They won't be included because the numbers could be twisted very easily by airlines who don't like the results. eg. well, 1300 people from Qantas answered but only 20 did from airline X. But fail to mention that only 30 people work for airline X.
Point taken if that's an issue, but maybe just include the total number of responses that went into the analyses without differentiating between airlines (those companies where too few people answered were explicitly excluded anyway)? Otherwise a first instinctive reaction could well be "On how many overall responses are these results based? 100? 30 disgruntled Qantas employees and 20 who are satisfied with working for Virgin? Who should care?"

Otherwise, for the "overall picture of the industry in a story type manner primarily with the use of data" I think it's a good approach; I'm just jealous of the amount of data you have and the interesting topic .
Armchairflyer is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2012, 10:59
  #52 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Overall number has been presented broaudly in doc. It's actually 2725.

To put that in perspective, the polls you see in the Australian are based on 1000 samples out of a population of 23 million or whatever we have today in Aus.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2012, 11:56
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vienna
Age: 50
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, so I just overlooked that, sorry; disregard then. (BTW, absolutely agree that this is a good response rate.)
Armchairflyer is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2012, 06:39
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone at Tulla had the Future Careers advice session wonder if it was as bigger joke as the one held at Avalon which was nothing short of laughable.
Jethro Gibbs is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2012, 06:51
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fear not Aviation workers AVALON Airport chief executive officer Justin Giddings is to create 20,000 jobs at Avalon .
Yes he did say that TWENTY THOUSAND JOBS .

Avalon jobs take off | Geelong, VIC, Australia

Last edited by Jethro Gibbs; 9th Jul 2012 at 06:56.
Jethro Gibbs is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2012, 12:27
  #56 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Justin is correct mate, the jobs will beover 20 years as Melbourne suburbs move West.

BTW guys the final survey presentation is currently with printers.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2012, 12:50
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Give me a Break there will never be 20,000 jobs at Avalon its going backwards .
This has to be the stupidest statement ever made by a so called CEO then the local paper prints it as a jobs boom when people from Forstaff are being made redundant .

Last edited by Jethro Gibbs; 9th Jul 2012 at 13:10.
Jethro Gibbs is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2012, 00:16
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How many of them will be 'proper' aviation jobs and how many of them will be for car park attendants and casuals doing split shifts in the airport coffee shops?
Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2012, 11:12
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas faced with 30 forced redundancies

Qantas faced with 30 forced redundancies | Geelong, VIC, Australia
Jethro Gibbs is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2012, 09:43
  #60 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanx mods for leaving on the sticky list for so long. Before thread is lost to the nether, please note the 24 page booklet with results is with the printer. 400 copies to be sent people such as business leaders, press, pollies, management and in our case, ALAEA Reps.

Will be released on day that we choose to catch any follow up press. Electronic version will be available from union websites and I shall also post on here. Once released will be working on a version for global aviation unions via the ITF.

Thanx all for your participation.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.