Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

For QF to Overcome UK UPD - Change the Flight Numbers in SIN?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

For QF to Overcome UK UPD - Change the Flight Numbers in SIN?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Apr 2012, 07:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For QF to Overcome UK UPD - Change the Flight Numbers in SIN?

QF and BA pax travelling on same flight number services from Europe to Australia will have to pay the highest air passenger duty, as the APD is calculated based on the final destination of the plane from the UK.

So while EK pax will pay it to DXB, SQ pax will pay it to SIN, and QF pax who change to another QF flight in SIN will also just pay it to SIN.

Why don't QF and BA just swap flight numbers in SIN, and indicate QF1/2 as flights that terminate in SIN. Then all their pax will only have to pay the duty to SIN and not beyond.

This is a highly unfair tax as we all know - EK pax flying LHR-DXB-SYD will pay the tax only on the LHR-DXB portion while QF pax on a QF2 service will pay the full tax to SYD.

Any regulatory problems with this solution for QF?
DrPepz is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2012, 07:41
  #2 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Question

QF and BA pax travelling on same flight number services from Europe to Australia will have to pay the highest air passenger duty, as the APD is calculated based on the final destination of the plane from the UK.
I don't think that's quite right. I thought it was from the first port outside of Europe? Thus EK, Qatari, etc still have the competitive advantage by hubbing only 5-6 hours from Europe as opposed to Cathay, Thai, SQ, QF, JAL, etc who are all 12-14 hours from Europe but at least it's not based upon Sydney for QF.
Keg is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2012, 08:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Age: 39
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The tax is based on the passenger's entire journey. i.e. The distance from London to their final destination and not just to the destination of their first flight. The tax should be the same for all passengers travelling London to Sydney no matter which airline they fly, where the aircraft stops to refuel or whether the flight number changes or not.

The only way to have the tax calculated on the distance to the first flight only is where there is more than 24 hours between the scheduled arrival of the first flight and the scheduled departure of the second flight. Any shorter time is considered a connecting flight.

If people are really keen to avoid the tax they can always fly into LHR but take the Eurostar to Paris (or anywhere else in Europe) and fly back from there. Of course, if you're flying on Qantas you end up transiting through LHR again anway, but the tax doesn't apply to transit passengers.

Last edited by ButFli; 1st Apr 2012 at 08:24.
ButFli is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2012, 08:31
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As far as I remember Air Passenger Duty is based on the entire journey including connecting flights if the connection is made within 24 hours.

Ways around paying are to buy separate non connecting tickets, have a stop over on the way or use an alternative such as Eurostar or Ferries to get out of the UK and then fly onwards.

Open jaw tickets are a worth considering as prices can be similar to or less than a normal return. Eg Paris - Your Destination - London.

Travel search engines should give you an idea of what works.

Air Passenger Duty (APD) - ABTA
Metro man is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2012, 13:13
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Devonport Tasmania Australia
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can avoid the monster tax by taking for instance a LHR PAR or LHR FRA flight on a seperate ticket and only pay the EU half price shorthaul tax and then pickup an AF/QF codeshare ex PAR to SIN or the QF 6 to SIN.

The LON Europe leg should idealy be on a seperate ticket and provides a chance for a stopover at an extra destination.

BA are pretty cheap internally one way, and for the airlines with high oneways, we haf vays off making zem cheap!

Many ways to skin a badger but what a stupid move

Just another way of gathering taxes that will most likely never see anything greenish - good thing in a way - just encourages the bastards.

Best all

EWL
Eastwest Loco is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2012, 23:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Marion, South Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No to the UK Tax.

My wife and I flew Etihad MEL-AUH-DUB and return to avoid the UK Taxes.

Mike
mmciau is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2012, 03:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BTW Changing in Singapore wouldn't help as it is in the same tax band as Sydney. You need to look for somewhere less than 2000 miles from London to pay the lowest rate.

Across the Atlantic, Aer Lingus with a stop over in Dublin or Shannon for a day on the way over and a connecting flight on the way back would be worth a look.

Many European cities are major air hubs with connections worldwide easily available.

Using your frequent flyer miles gives an idea of how bad the taxes are, just look at the additional charges to fly from LHR compared to other European cities. I came home from a recent holiday via Paris instead of Heathrow, saved a lot of money on the airfare and enjoyed some sight seeing.
Metro man is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2012, 04:13
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Can just see any continental airport (eg. Paris, AMS, FRA etc.) rubbing their hands together with glee on this.

CDG & AF should be winners - have a few Eurostars pull into CDG each day (especially if they get together & offer combination fares) and they'd pull in the punters.
Taildragger67 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.