Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

More concerns for QF staff

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Oct 2011, 05:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: on skybeds
Age: 43
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down More concerns for QF staff

QF seeks rights variations
QANTAS is requesting changes to capacity determinations on a number of international routes, seeking variations which will enable the capacity to also be used “by any wholly-owned subsidiary” of the carrier. The International Air Services Commission yesterday published the requests, relating to the renewal of determinations which expire during 2012.
Affected routes include flights to Germany, Hong Kong, Thailand, and the Philippines, with Qantas in each case requesting renewals of current capacity allocations but with the modifications asking for the ability to operate using an offshoot airline. The move is intriguing given the previously announced plans for QF’s new Asian-based premium
airline, along with the expected rapid expansion of Jetstar International once it begins toreceive its long-awaited 787s.
skybed is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 05:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 298
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lucky Jetstar Asia and Red Q are not "wholly owned"......they can't be....
busdriver007 is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 06:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: australia
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why have the clause "wholly owned subsidiary" if there is no scope for another entity under the Qantas sale act? How do they get around this one in the future?
Wait and see i guess.
schlong hauler is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 06:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the QF website it refers to Jetstar Australia as a "wholly owned subsidary", but only having a 49% stake in Jetstar Asia. Isn't this because local Singaporean law dictates a local carrier must be majority owned by Singaporeans?

Wouldn't this apply to RedQ and therefore how will a partial owned subsidary be able to use this variation that has been applied to the IASC?
manfred is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 06:56
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: on skybeds
Age: 43
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suppose

this would be a good idea for AIPA/ALEA/TWU etc. to ask an aviation QC for an informed opinion.
skybed is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 07:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wholly-owned sub (which holds the capacity rights) buys space on aircraft owned by partially-owned sub.

Looks to me not far off how the SIN-AKL flights are run - 3K (Jetstar Asia) number on a JQ-operated, VH- airframe.

So you'll have JQ-nnn being flown on a 9V- / 9M- airframe SYD-Asia-FRA.
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 08:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We all know its only a matter of time before Jetstar gets its first A380 (most likely one of the now delayed QF A380's) and there will be nothing AIPA can do about it. If AIPA and other unions continue to strike, that will only assist in speeding up the arrival of Jetstar's inaugural A380 flight.

NP
NewPiper is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 08:49
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Up left - Down right
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AJ openly stated that the next 6 A380 deliveries would be put back (in AJ speak that meas) Jet* probably will take up the option of those A380's and fly then in Europe. Simple as that .
Short_Circuit is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 08:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great, 600 bogans on one aeroplane. I'm sure the great unwashed can't wait. Choice!
Redstone is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 09:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: goulburn
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes but can you see the profits that will flow from coffee and muffin sales.

The real issue is when they destroy Qantas, where will they stick all the costs to make it profitable?????
ohallen is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 09:18
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
AIPA Pilots on strike? Not recently.

If AIPA and other unions continue to strike, that will only assist in speeding up the arrival of Jetstar's inaugural A380 flight.

I hate to burst your bubble New Piper, but AIPA (or more accurately Qantas longhaul pilots) have not been on strike since 1966 and have not even had so much as a 30 second stop work meeting, let alone strike action, in the current dispute.

However, if Qantas Group management have decided to employ the A380 through Jetstar or any other non-mainline entity, there's only one thing that will stop them... and that process may start on October 28th.
C441 is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 09:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: springfield retirement castle
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NewPiper, you mention AIPA continuing to strike, can you name the first, or any subsequent occasions on which they have conducted an actual strike?
jaded boiler is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 10:22
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: toontown
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to spoil such a good story, but Bruce was offered the 6 A380's but declined. He does not want them. Good story anyway.
outside limits is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 10:38
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When it comes to the boards final solution, I doubt weather Bruce gets much of a choice in anything.
Redstone is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 10:51
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The cloud
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't matter what Bruce said... At the end of the day he is just a puppet... And a muppet
Xcel is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 11:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: PERTH,AUSTRALIA
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Xcel,thanks for the laugh.
RATpin is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 14:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C441 and jaded boiler, just for the sake of completeness, I am certain that one LH pilot took a one hour stoppage ('strike') earlier this year, basically to keep the work stoppage option alive past the 30 day period to commence PIA.

manfred - your premise is correct. When J* Asia was established about 7 years ago, the Singapore Govt had a shareholding and a couple of other singaporean buinesses to bring it to 51%.
ACT Crusader is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2011, 20:00
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: fairfield
Age: 82
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AIPA (or more accurately Qantas longhaul pilots) have not been on strike since 1966 and have not even had so much as a 30 second stop work meeting, let alone strike action, in the current dispute.
Crusader is correct. The President had 2 stop work meetings with himself before he flew from London to Singapore.
fatmike is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2011, 00:20
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flew internationally the other day.

The FO did the AIPA PA.

Mentioned the following:

"Unlike the other unions , Qantas pilots are not taking industrial action, hence why we are making these P.A.'s".

I thought by wearing red ties and/or making PA's, you are taking a form of industrial action?
PPRuNeUser0198 is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2011, 00:48
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For those who have not seen the QF request of variation of rights, here is the link...

Leaving Facebook... | Facebook
Dixons Millions is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.