Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Jetstar crew "drunk with tiredness"

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar crew "drunk with tiredness"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jun 2011, 20:58
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
From the article:

In response, Jetstar said: "Safety is our No.1 priority and we have an open culture of reporting issues. If a member of our crew is too fatigued then they should not operate the flight and we openly communicate this."
Now this seriously offends me.

The previous "toughen up princesses" email demonstrates that the informal Jetstar corporate culture is that complaint will not be tolerated.

The real Jetstar culture is:

You dare to try and communicate that you are "too tired" and see what happens to you!
Sunfish is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2011, 22:43
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hope you have a good solicitor
Don't need one. I believe that my interpretation of the Migration Regulations is robust. But thank you for the advice. Unfortunately I will choose not to take it on this occasion. If Jetstar want to find me and take me to court then so be it but I will make sure that the case is totally in the public eye ensuring the whole country is aware of what is going on and the threat that this type of arrangement poses to the future of this country's jobs. The very thing the Migration Regulations were introduced to protect.

oh and by the way cargo shipping is a totally different kettle of fish!!!

....and a large bank account
Nope!!



just thought that you, and others would also like to know:

The Jetstar cabin crew recruiters have just this week returned to Australia from Bangkok where they are recruiting 1200 Thai crew.

There as been no Australian Based International ground school for well over 3 years. The number of grounds schools that have gone through in Singapore is in the high 20's.

There have been so many Australian crews on transfer lists for years, most wanting to transfer to International only to be told that they plan to imminently recruit 1200 Thai.!!

The game plan is that Jetstar want the Australian crews that have got them this far to resign and then be replaced by off shore crews brought in to do the flying.

When the 'Sunrise Show' did the special last November on Jetstar to Hawaii., a special 'all Aussie crew' were used on the return flights to and from Hawaii - This is not the norm!

The 'generous allowances' Buchanan is talking of in the Telegraph article are the overnight allowance, paid in country of origin currency. All other allowances are built into the base wage. These are 'sweat shop' conditions and he is lying through his teeth.

They have made it very hard to get transport home from the Back of the Clock fying, because CC have to deal with people in Manilla who are blissfully unaware that they have to supply anyone requesting it with transport home in these circumstances.

BB states Jetstar is an Australian based company - C'mon Bruce, make your mind up one way or the other. He stood up in a 'road show' and stated after being ask about off shore recruitment. "we never said we were an Australian company".

More to Follow

The Kelpie
The Kelpie is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2011, 23:10
  #23 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And foreign air hostesses are working for budget airline Jetstar for half the pay of Australian workers to deliver cut-priced flights.
The use of International (arguably 'slave') labour is not to keep prices down, but to deliver greater bonuses to executive managers. They could still use Australian labour with little or no effect on prices.
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 00:05
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 176
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
the spin makes me heave...
and me.....
LAME2 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 00:32
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Welcome to market economics the hard way, lads.

Australian aviation is now learning what the rest of the world has known for some time. You can all say goodbye to the Qantas of old, it's a dinosaur anyway and could never survive in that form. Like it or not, Jetstar and it's ilk are the way of the future, and no amount of breast-beating will change that.

You'd better all learn to adapt...

BTW not suggesting that this is a good thing, it isn't, but it is the new reality.
remoak is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 01:02
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The cloud
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is not unique to aviation, a lot of the costal shipping in Australia is done with foreign craft and crews between "domestic" ports.
swh I think you'll find that any ship operating within Australian waters MUST have an Australian crew... The union has helped regulation that dictates the key positions which must be filled, and what is deemed as "operating". Of course their are some exemptions, but as a whole this is the crux of their operating requirements.

I don't see why the government can't open it's eyes - they won't allow more than 49% ownership by foreign investments but we can operate with 100% foreign crew.
Xcel is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 01:07
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The cloud
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would love to know when maximum duty became standard - minimum rest became standard - and exemptions and extensions became worlds best practice...

Productivity is important I agree - but not at the detriment of safety.
Xcel is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 01:13
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kichin
Posts: 1,057
Received 728 Likes on 196 Posts
Not sure if it has been mentioned here or elsewhere, but here is the J* response to the Herald Sun. Spot the spin anyone?


http://resources.news.com.au/files/2...s-response.pdf
gordonfvckingramsay is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 01:41
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A slippery response Simon.

The reason you do not want to re answer the questions is because, I would suggest, that they are asked in a slightly different manner and to answer truthfully would drop your boss in it!!

More to follow


The kelpie
The Kelpie is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 02:30
  #30 (permalink)  

Grandpa Aerotart
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SWP
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A thread about, allegedly, fatigue and you spend 2 pages railing against Asian FA pay?

I will give you a hint - these girls are being VERY well paid by the standards of their respective countries. Plus some will be hawking the fork down route and earning a shedload more cash.and some will marry pilots and end up in Australia. And before anyone shouts me down for that last statement its merely a fact. Happens in my airline, happens in CX, EK, Thai etc etc etc.

I pay my Filipino live in maid < 1/3rd what these girls are paid and when she sends 80% of her pay home each month THAT proportion equates to the same pay as a Provincial Court Judge. In just the first several years she worked for me she bought some acres, built a house and stocked it with family and farm animals - all cash. Her biggest fear in life is me leaving and she losing her job.

Wouldn't we love to be earning enough disposable income to pay cash for some acres and build a house after working just 3 years?

They're being paid about the same as FAs the length and breadth of asia..in many cases significantly more. We have Thai, Burmese, Indonesian, Malay, Filipino, Vietnamese girls working the cabin on my airline for probably slightly less money and they are VERY happy with their lot. Great bunch of girls.

You have plenty to be concerned about and PLENTY to be fighting for at JQ - this aint it.

Like JQ if I, and 10s of 1000s of expats/middle and upper class asians, asia wide, were forced to pay what a live in maid cost in Australia, Riz and millions of her sisters would be unemployed instantly. 100s of millions of Pesos would no longer flow back into the PI. 10s of millions of extended family would be impoverished.

Same with the Thai etc girls working JQ asia cabins. They're not 'slaves'. No one press ganged them into a JQA airbus. The competition for those jobs would have been/is FIERCE.

If this was imposed by govt fiat the first people protesting would be the maids and FAs...at their RIGHT to sell their labour at a rate THEY consider fair being taken away.

The carryon on this thread shows you as nothing but ignorant of the world outside Australia...not a good look.

Last edited by Chimbu chuckles; 12th Jun 2011 at 03:03.
Chimbu chuckles is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 02:46
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chimbu is right on the money. But then, Australian aviation has always lived in splendid isolation from the rest of the world... NZ is no better.

The carryon on this thread shows you as nothing but ignorant of the world outside Australia...not a good look.
Precisely.
remoak is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 02:48
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: With Ratty and Mole
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Outsource Management

I'm sure you could get an Asian CEO to run Qantas for about $100k/pa.
They would do a damn sight better job.
Does fatigue legislation apply to offshore employees?
packrat is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 02:58
  #33 (permalink)  

Grandpa Aerotart
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SWP
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm sure you could get an Asian CEO to run Qantas for about $100k/pa.
They would do a damn sight better job.
I can give you the name of JUST such an individual - seriously. AWESOME SQ trained CEO.

Does fatigue legislation apply to offshore employees?
Flying VH reg yes - other no. Having said that the FA FTLs on my airline are not onerous let alone dangerous.
Chimbu chuckles is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 03:25
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: under a rock
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How did a report on fatigue end up dealing with pay grades in OZ and Asia?
I have stood back and read a lot of posts on this site for quite a while but have not opened my mouth.
My question is how is pay related to safety?
All FA are trained by the same people to the same standards all this is dictated by the regulators, manufacturers and the operators!
They are all doing the same job and have the same experience. So far I have not heard of anyone saying they are less qualified or less trained just paid less.
I hate what is happening in OZ but what can I do?
I have flown on Jstar with a foriegn crew and an OZ crew I can see no difference?
When someone complains about fatigue and then you mention pay you get everyone offside.
tech-line is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 05:48
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Simon is leaving?

Maybe he is pissed at being passed over by worthless for the top at QANTAS!!

Simon, you did not get the job because you have a pair of balls and you are a rotten liar!

We can all see through your spin.
The Kelpie is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 06:36
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Not Syderknee
Posts: 1,011
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just to clear up a few misconceptions about coastal shipping
Licences
Under the Act vessels may be licensed to participate in Australia's coastal trade irrespective of flag and crew nationality. Licenses are issued on condition that:
the vessel's crew are paid Australian wages while the vessel trades on the Australian coast; and
the vessel's crew have access to the vessel's library facilities
Coasting Trade Licences & Permits
rmcdonal is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 23:55
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
For the benefit of HMCClown and anyone else who doesn't understand the trick Jetstar is pulling:

A double bind is an emotionally distressing dilemma in communication in which an individual (or group) receives two or more conflicting messages, in which one message negates the other. This creates a situation in which a successful response to one message results in a failed response to the other (and vice versa), so that the person will be automatically wrong regardless of response. The double bind occurs when the person cannot confront the inherent dilemma, and therefore cannot resolve it or opt out of the situation.

Double bind - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



...And what Jetstar has done is say:

If a member of our crew is too fatigued then they should not operate the flight and we openly communicate this."
But here is what they are really saying - a classic double bind, from the Jetstar email:



Toughen up princesses!

You aren’t fatigued, you are tired and can’t be bothered going to work.

The hardest thing about doing [flight] JQ117 backed up by the BOC [back of the clock, e.g. from midnight to 6 a.m.] is the time away from the family. There is ample time for rest if you utilize it correctly. I understand this is easy to say but sacrifices have to be made. We are all shift workers and that doesn’t always fit in with normal life. If you became an airline pilot thinking that you will be home every night and not have to fly through the night, then that is pretty naive. Might be time to go instructing. (threat - do you really want to work here?)


Now the powers to that be could have used this as a perfect opportunity to down-size the base, or even close it. (- another threat) But it shows that JQ is committed to the base and want it to work. Having said that, if I was Bruce and a bunch of pilots, who have taken a lot of days off, only fly 60-75 hours a month, started to call in ‘fatigued’ and didn’t want those days to come out of personal leave days, then I would start to look at other options. If flights started to be cancelled, then I would not hesitate in closing the base (-repeated threat) and have all flying done from MEL. Be careful of what you wish for!

.........

....If you honestly believe you can’t operate safely, not just because you feel terrible, then call in UFD [unfit for duty]. But it is UNFIT FOR DUTY! I can’t see how it can not be taken from your personal leave. (- threat, your leave will be docked if you call in fatigued.)

http://www.pprune.org/dg-p-reporting...ml#post6355713

I think I know the way this ends. A landing accident due to fatigue, runway excursion, followed by a fire. Those pretty little Asian girls won't be able to cope with the evacuation and a lot of people will die.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 02:04
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't see an emotional rant....again, just a measured, logical analysis.

Perhaps there is something to be noted in your 'clown'-like handle.

LOL!!!

PG
Popgun is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 09:25
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: On a date with destiny.
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Prefer doppio ristretto myself...
assasin8 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 11:51
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alabama, then Wyoming, then Idaho and now staying with Kharon on Styx houseboat
Age: 61
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Simon, you did not get the job because you have a pair of balls and you are a rotten liar!
But so does/is she !!!!
gobbledock is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.