Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Would Olivia like to comment on this?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Would Olivia like to comment on this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th May 2011, 11:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Outofoz
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Would Olivia like to comment on this?

Qantas prosecuted for breach of curfew | Stuff.co.nz
hotnhigh is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 11:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
expect something like

"this did not involve Qantas, it was Jetconnect!"

It amazes me how during positive news it is all Qantas Qantas Qantas and when there is some adverse publicity she tries to distance the Qantas 'Brand' from it.

Qantas is no longer an Airline, it is just a Company that has an airline as one of it's income streams (or expenditure streams depending how you look at it)

If there was a business brain amongst them they would strengthen the group position by diversification into something that is not airline related that brings in oodles of profit like breaking into the mining sector. Instead these guys want to set up another airline!!!

The mind boggles!!

More to Follow

The Kelpie
The Kelpie is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 11:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 943
Received 37 Likes on 12 Posts
Didn't the Qantas group break a Sydney curfew as well not that long ago?
Bit of a habit creeping in but I guess the company already has good reputation for paying fines after breaking the rules under current management.
ozbiggles is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 13:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ozzzzzzz
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The curfew has been in place for 14 years.

Jitconnit has been in operation for how long? And already, ALREADY its breaking laws and costing the 'group' money. What a joke!!

The TAB might have bets on a date till the first hull loss. Im not wishing it, but when it happens it will finally be the day we can ALL say, told you so.
Ultergra is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 14:30
  #5 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Given that Jetconnect is a separate company I guess they'll pay the fine out of their own accounts and it won't impact on Qantas at all....oh, wait.

Why would Qantas comment? Doesn't Jetconnect have it's own media spokespeople? Are Qantas charging Jetconnect and appropriate amount of money for using our spokespeople to respond to things like this?
Keg is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 20:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jetconnect doesn't have a bank account.

As testified by the jetconnect CEO in the AIPA/Jetconnect case a few months back, or more accurately he wasn't sure!!

More to Follow

The Kelpie
The Kelpie is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 21:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Za farzer land
Age: 53
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jetetconnect does have a bank account as it transferred millions out of it when jetstar pushed the company out of their domestic operations and on to the Tasman flying. If you guys did some research on the new Zealand business websites you would also see their earnings.

Jetconnect has been flying successfully in an and out Wellington, argueably one of the more challenging airports on the the Qantas "group" network for 10 years now as this is how old Jetconnect is.

The Capt was told to continue to Wellington by operations even after the capt questioned the ops controllers on the curfew issue.
Fruet Mich is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 21:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cost of doing business?

Someone on the night obviously decided any possible fine would be cheaper than a divert. I guess they're about to find out.
waren9 is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 21:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: In the Trees
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 3 Posts
Fruet Mich, Qantas mainline where doing it lot longer before that, but hey thats another story.....or is it. Heard a funny pushback clearance the other day in YMML," cleared to push back clear of the Qantas "painted" 737 " taxiing out from the international", those ATC guys have a bit of cheek!
ANCDU is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 22:32
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,095
Received 481 Likes on 129 Posts
Jitconnit has been in operation for how long? And already, ALREADY its breaking laws and costing the 'group' money. What a joke!!
I imagine these guys were a Wellington crew and knew full well when the curfew kicked in. That leads me to believe there was probably a good reason for not diverting to Auckland or Christchurch.
Just because the media article says there was no reason to be late doesn't mean there was no reason to break the curfew. Thats just what the head of the 'Wellington Air Noise Commitee' said.....doubt he was privvy to the ins and outs of the flight.Probably owns a house beside the airport and votes Green.
framer is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 23:03
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
QF/J-connect antics aside the whole idea of a curfew is the real issue. Insane !!!!!

Residents pretty much dictate the safety of an aircraft



Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 23:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Windy Capital
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Code:
 
doubt he was privvy to the ins and outs of the flight.
Airport company follow up all flights that land/take-off in the curfew period for an explanation from the operator as to why it happened, so he would have been in receipt of this from Qantas ops. Curfew is 0100 local with a 30 minute disruption period. To be another 17 minutes after that would indicate that the flight was always going to be tight to land prior to 0130, something Qantas ops would have known prior to take-off.

Code:
 
Residents pretty much dictate the safety of an aircraft
Aircraft can land in an emergency without penalty. Obviously this was not the case. Wellington is not the only airport in the world with a curfew.
Mr & Mrs Rocketboots is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 23:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Who cleared him to land

from Qantas ops
You mean Jetconnect ops? The separate company and all?

Oh I forgot, Jetconnect is a 'shelf' company and actually doesn't own anything.
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 19th May 2011, 00:04
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Windy Capital
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Code:
You mean Jetconnect ops
Oops - my mistake. Shouldn't look like a duck, walk like a duck and talk like a duck...

Code:
Who cleared him to land
Not their responsiblity. Much like they don't ask for your pilot licence number and check you are suitably rated and current when you ask for a clearance - they expect the pilot/aircraft operator to know and comply with the requirements.
Mr & Mrs Rocketboots is offline  
Old 19th May 2011, 00:36
  #15 (permalink)  
smylie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Auckland had 30 kt x wind.
Christchurch had suffered a major earthquake days before and were in rescue mode.
Tower advised Captain to land at Wellington as Christchurch had enough problems on their hands.Nobody checked with airport authority for permission.
**** happens.
 
Old 19th May 2011, 21:14
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Windy Capital
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Code:
Auckland had 30 kt x wind.
Christchurch had suffered a major earthquake days before and were in rescue mode.
Again, all info that Ops would/should have known prior to the aircraft departing Australia.

If it was a divert from another airport, no problem. Airport authority can't give permission to break curfew, only the city council.
Mr & Mrs Rocketboots is offline  
Old 19th May 2011, 22:51
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cant 737's do 30kt crosswind landings?
waren9 is offline  
Old 19th May 2011, 23:19
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by waren9
Cant 737's do 30kt crosswind landings?
Jetconnect pilots are on a cheaper EBA.

They don't get paid a crosswind allowance.
Jetro6UL is offline  
Old 19th May 2011, 23:26
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,560
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
The Capt was told to continue to Wellington by operations even after the capt questioned the ops controllers on the curfew issue.
Top cover. I like it. "He said to, Sir!"
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 20th May 2011, 08:53
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey guys,

Lay off Our Livvie. She's had a testing week.

First up I heard her on 702 radio copping a serve re: Qantas losing some Guns from some Olympian in FRA.......she was spinning her usual charm magnificently.

Then when the 744 "blew an engine" and had to return to BKK.....there she was back on the job-spinning with total elocutory elegance.

Didn't she get some new promotion to Exco. ???

How comes she is still shovelling ****e to the news hacks.

Oh Olivia -this is well past your job description (and pay grade) now lovie.

Time to get some one with your style,grace,humility and elegance(not to mention the hair)

mmmmm-let me think?????

How about Paris Hilton
stubby jumbo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.