Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Letter to Geoffrey Thomas (Aviation expert)

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Letter to Geoffrey Thomas (Aviation expert)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th May 2011, 06:52
  #21 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs up

Are you trying to tell me that as a "shareholder" after reading Steve's letter your greatest concern is with semantics? Shonky overseas maintenance, buried reports, outsourcing debacles etc etc and you want to quibble and play word games. Well done. Of all the myriad of issues and problems at the moment, this is the important one.
Lol. After shown to be a bit of a dill I wonder if QAN Shareholder will return any time soon.

Nice work Steve.
Keg is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 07:12
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To all QAN Shareholders out there. You got a dividend lately? That's the sort of mismanagement we're dealing with!
bandit2 is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 07:28
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: aviation heaven, australia
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well done steve, you make us proud every day.
Maybe we should take him up to Malaysia and Singapore and show him how they do things up there, or don't!
empire4 is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 07:33
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 56
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not bad at all Steve however I still don't think these guys really get the responsibility a LAME has when certifying on aircraft. These clown have to understand that a when a Licensed Aircraft Maintenance Engineer signs for the work he/she has carried out on the aircraft - that signature remains with the Aircraft logbook/Tech log for the life of the aircraft. A LAME is still held fully accountable for the work he/she has certified for even after he has retired. If an aircraft has an incident and you signed for the work or maintenance release then its your ass on the line or in the court room. Really - LAME's get paid Fock all for the responsibility and accountability they have on a daily basis.
Flokk
Flokkered is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 07:47
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QAN_Shareholder, I refer to my quote below from another thread:

Originally Posted by Jetro6UL
Only moronic self flagellating cretins buy airline shares.

We jet fuel sniffing braindead idiots get them given to us as punishment for making a tragically misguided career choice earlier on in life.
I gather you bought your shares.
Jetro6UL is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 07:47
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: sydney
Age: 76
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a rant and why ? mmmmmmmmmm it has got to him , poor bugger.
unionist1974 is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 08:06
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Aviation expert
Sounds like a pretty cushie job. How do I become one??
Ngineer is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 08:07
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1974,
What is it with all you management pricks that you feel the need to get on here and pretend to be something that you are not? I don't think anyone here believes you are a unionist, anymore than they believe QAN_Shareholder is a shareholder. Your whole existence is based on lies - lies to the Senate, lies to the media, lies at the negotiating table. At least most people on here, while not divulging their names, make it fairly obvious who they are, whether they are pilots, engineers or F/As.

So why the need to pretend you aren't management? Or is deception the only method of "negotiating in good faith" that you know?
'holic is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 08:19
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: sydney
Age: 76
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
holic , are you related to Alco , sounds like it to me . And who entitles you to judge the credentials of a worker . you johnny come latelly. go back to your $ 129 plus LAME job and whinge about how hard you are done by you fool
unionist1974 is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 08:24
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Calm down guys. I am reminded of the old saying about not arguing with idiots...
Much Ado is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 08:27
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
holic , are you related to Alco , sounds like it to me . And who entitles you to judge the credentials of a worker . you johnny come latelly. go back to your $ 129 plus LAME job and whinge about how hard you are done by you fool
You're obviously a 20 something management stooge. No life experience and you write like you are typing on a Facebook wall.

Either that, or you failed English and can't spell

So what sort of bonus do you get for stirring up the troops?
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 08:36
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA
Age: 51
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmmmm

So what sort of bonus do you get for stirring up the troops?
He will get 2 chocolate chip muffins for being a good boy
Budfox is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 08:44
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He will get 2 chocolate chip muffins for being a good boy
Which will directly affect the bottom line of the company by the sounds of it.
David75 is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 08:47
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
G'day Steve,
Just a quick note to say thankyou for your time in writing that letter, I don't think I have ever read/heard anyone explain our position as clearly as you have done. I'm very proud to be in an association such as the ALAEA and have leadership in the way we do. Just for a minute think of where the flying public would be without our association being the buffer. I hope every single person who flies on a cheap ticket will write to Qantas/Jetstar and explain that they would be happy to pay $5 more per flight if we are still fixing their planes that they and their families fly on!
Steve, why don't you send that letter to every Board member and Engineering manager and ask them to respond ? If there is only silence (which I expect, as they couldn't defend their position),we draw a line in the sand and defend our position to the end! This is by no means what I want but what the flying public would expect of us, it's huge sacrifice for us and our families but what is the alternative? I do not want to be known as a Qantas engineer that was on duty when a plane went down! I ask all of you, do you want to work for a company who hates you and hates what you do to the point of publicly fighting and demeaning you! I personally(mortgage,wife & young kids) have a lot to lose if we are shutdown, but I also have a very long and proud family history working at Qantas, it wouldn't be fare to them to stand by and do nothing.
up2us is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 08:47
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry 1974, if you really are a "unionist" I apologise ......... sincerely ............... no, I really do
'holic is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 08:52
  #36 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
The thought that springs to mind.

Full page ad. Open letter to the travelling public. Wouldn't need much editing in order to make it suitable for that forum. Not sure the costs of those sorts of things in papers around the nation. Now's probably not the time for it anyway but it would be at some stage.
Keg is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 09:13
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 18th May 2011, 09:20
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nt
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At first I was feeling anxious about all of this stuff going on at the Qantas group. Even though I don't work there it is quite apparent that this is an assault on workers in this industry. But now, after a few days of following these posts and the mainstream media I now find myself laughing at the stupidity of the corporate types responsible for this current mess. They are so hell-bent on crushing their workforce and disengaging every member of their staff that that they seem to have poured all of their resources into this plan. So much so that as I read it in the papers today it is quite apparent they are not actually placing any resources into running an airline group. Their products are looking more like an industrial dispute centre than an airline and I'm sure this is filtering through to the public perception. In the process I'm sure they are literally handing business class passengers to Virgin (thank you very much). It seems amazing to me that a) the board allows this current management to continue on this course of apparent self-destruction and b) that these management stooges on here continue to justify these corporate decisions. Just makes them look as inept as the QF management really.
biton is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 09:26
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Geoff Thomas/Sunrise on QF Engos and Pilots
I turned that off halfway through, how disgusting. If any pilot or engineer had the professionalism of this "journalist" there'd be smoking holes littered across Australia.
ConfigFull is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 09:30
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: The Boardroom
Age: 65
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Management are in charge

Mr. Geoffrey Thomas is an excellent writer.

We believe that:
He knows more about our organization than any frontline worker.
He understands that we are about profit and money.
He understands our core need, which is to protect the public from mob like unionised and non-unionised brutality that may impact our bottom line.
He understands that we must feed the financial needs of our shareholder.
He understands that integrity, diversity, competiveness and safety are what Management is championing.
He understands the value of a solid business structure and that Management are ‘The Gatekeepers’ to our ongoing success.

We believe that Management are superior in intellect. We further believe that our ability to outwit, outlast and outplay any collective or individual attempt to force our hand will be met with a swift response which cannot be combated. We further believe that we are living in an era where the white collar rules supreme and with the support of our shareholder, bonus structure and sideline consultancies we will remain unbeatable.
The game has commenced.

The Boardroom Beckons
Management In Charge is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.