Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Radiation Warning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Mar 2011, 12:06
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
In that case don't stand near a major road for any period of time.

The heavy metals and other nasties that you will absorb will make anything you pick up in Japan look like a minor Inconvenience.
Dehavillanddriver is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2011, 18:50
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gold coast QLD australia
Age: 86
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you want to stand near a road like that Dehavdriver, thats your choice. To be sent there by your employer is a whole new ball game, especially when you know they don't give a ratz, and will certainly not compensate if you get ill down the track. After 49 years in the airline industry, I came to realise that you play ball with them and they will stick the bat up your ar$e everytime. Believe it.
teresa green is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2011, 09:44
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: A parallel universe.
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please allow me to kick this thread to the top once again.

Despite all the downplaying, it now appears that the containment vessel of the #3 reactor has been damaged.

Furthermore, Asahi Shinbun, a Japanese newspaper website is suggesting that the level has been raised from 5 to 6, only one level below the Chernobyl meltdown. (nothing about this on CNN, BBC, Reuters etc)

Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant, crippled by the Great East Japan Earthquake of March 11, has discharged more radiation than the infamous Three Mile Island nuclear plant in the United States, according to calculations by the central government.

It has already reached a level 6 serious accident on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES).
While I understand that fear mongering leads to nothing, I'm also quite appalled by the way people on this thread are downplaying the deaths and health effects which can be caused from an exposure to radiation either short term or long term. Will these people also shrug their shoulders if a regional jet crashes resulting in "only 60 fatalities?"

Perhaps most in the Europe/UK don't really care because Japan is a long way from home, but as someone who works for an airline that flies to Japan and also trans Pacific I definitely DO care and I have a scary feeling that the media and authorities are plotting together in a massive cover up. What are the long term health effects of breathing possibly contaminated air on a 10-12 hour trans Pacific flight, downwind of Fukushima?

Obviously the bombing of some Northern African desert country is far more important than any critical reporting of health effects and accurate radiation levels in one of the most developed industrial countries in the world. Go figure...

Last edited by Tank2Engine; 25th Mar 2011 at 10:21.
Tank2Engine is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 01:00
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On a long enough timeline the survival rate for everyone is zero
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A history lesson from Chernobyl: The True Battle of Chernobyl Uncensored (1:33)
breakfastburrito is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 08:52
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 49
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
Even now I agree this looks really bad, apparantly all workers have been evacuated due to extreme radiation levels at the plant, looks like containment has been breached. The food chain will be the one that cops it.
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 22:32
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
apparantly all workers have been evacuated due to extreme radiation levels at the plant
Apparently. Late news I heard was that the reading was a mistake, and the IAEA hasn't got a cracker abut it on it's website.

From the IAEA, 27/1330 UTC:
Radiation measurements in the containment vessels and suppression chambers of Units 1, 2 and 3 continued to decrease. White “smoke” continued to be emitted from Units 1 to 4.

Pressure in the RPV showed a slight increase at Unit 1 and was stable at Units 2 and 3, possibly indicating that there has been no major breach in the pressure vessels.
Capn Bloggs is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.