Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Merged: It's Too Late Mr. Joyce.

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Merged: It's Too Late Mr. Joyce.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Nov 2010, 03:20
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gold coast QLD australia
Age: 86
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course it was tongue in cheek, AMPCLAMP, more like the early days, not now. But it was more to ridicule the crazy stuff that comes out of CASA and earlier BASI. And it was also to show that there was good blood between pilots and engineers over the years, which is harder to maintain, with more paper work than dialogue.
teresa green is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2010, 06:02
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brisbane
Age: 49
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
This is why Alan Joyces' latest update on the engines was so nauseating - blaming Rolls Royce for everything. Would I be right in thinking that Fifteen years ago QF would have told Rolls Royce in no uncertain terms that they had a problem,
This is spot on Sunfish.

There was a time when Qantas lead the way and others played catch up. Now we just follow, playing catch up.
BrissySparkyCoit is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2010, 10:48
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Investors have delivered a stinging rebuke to Qantas over the brand damage it is suffering as a result of the recent incidents in the air.
In the latest Investor Pulse survey conducted by Colmar Brunton Research and BusinessDay, 90 per cent of respondents from the panel of 2000 investors agreed the Qantas brand, which is strongly associated with safety, was at risk. This is one of the strongest responses since the Investor Pulse panel was formed a year ago and underlines the strength of feeling among shareholders.
This kind of brand damage represents a potential double whammy for Qantas. Besides losing customers, the airline could face pricing pressure as passengers become less willing to pay a premium to fly with it.

A majority of 55 per cent of investors believe the cause of the midair incidents is due to the decision by Qantas a few years ago to outsource some of its maintenance. Another 37 per cent attributed them to cost-cutting in general and 26 per cent put them down to bad luck.
Great stuff. Ma and Pa kettle are getting all hot and agitated under their tweed coats and panama hats watching their precious investment wither away. I hope they feel the same anger at the next shareholder love-in and decide not to be such a bunch of dumbf*#ks by agreeing to remunerate these executive toads with such ludicrous salaries and share options.
Cactusjack is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2010, 10:53
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good call Sunfish, interesting reading in that and many recent posts.

I guess the question arises then, where did Qantas get these guys? It's not just Qantas either. Many Australian businesses are still running 1990s rules when it comes to short term bonuses and maintenance being the Devil's work. Why Is It So?

The top 20 Australian companies basically do banking, mining, food and (one) airline. We are an educated, wealthy, resource rich country. Why can't we do anything else? Is it because our crappy boards and senior executives are largely incapable of long term vision when they can skive off with short term bonuses?

Maybe banking, mining and food make such obscene profits with relatively little strategic planning that they will generally do well whatever decisions are made at the top level. Businesses that require a little more group grey matter don't seem to be shining in Australia, and I wonder if that's because our senior exec class are for the most part lousy, at least those who remain on-shore.
Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2010, 14:11
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brisbane
Age: 49
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cactusjack
Great stuff. Ma and Pa kettle are getting all hot and agitated under their tweed coats and panama hats watching their precious investment wither away. I hope they feel the same anger at the next shareholder love-in and decide not to be such a bunch of dumbf*#ks by agreeing to remunerate these executive toads with such ludicrous salaries and share options.
I think you will find "Ma and Pa kettle" are a very weak voice when it comes to Qantas investors. Institutional investors would have far greater say...... and many would be mates with the board/executive management"!!!
BrissySparkyCoit is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2010, 15:21
  #46 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Worrals:

I guess the question arises then, where did Qantas get these guys? It's not just Qantas either. Many Australian businesses are still running 1990s rules when it comes to short term bonuses and maintenance being the Devil's work. Why Is It So?

The top 20 Australian companies basically do banking, mining, food and (one) airline. We are an educated, wealthy, resource rich country. Why can't we do anything else? Is it because our crappy boards and senior executives are largely incapable of long term vision when they can skive off with short term bonuses?

Maybe banking, mining and food make such obscene profits with relatively little strategic planning that they will generally do well whatever decisions are made at the top level. Businesses that require a little more group grey matter don't seem to be shining in Australia, and I wonder if that's because our senior exec class are for the most part lousy, at least those who remain on-shore.
1. How do they get there? Narcissists attract each other. Once one of them gets into senior management, if not found out and quickly removed, they will attract and hire others. No one but another narcissist will willingly work for one or sit on a company Board with one because normal people don't like the constant backside licking that is required to keep in their good books. Narcissists don't mind giving the daily kiss to the bosses backside.

Where do they find them? I've had Two Directors foisted on my previous organisation that were recruited by the big boss in the Qantas Chairmans lounge. That is a major recruiting ground. The payback for big boss was a couple of new Board seats for themselves.

2. Can we do anything else but mining banking and farming? Yes we can and do, there are quite a few internationally competitive high technology manufacturing companies in Australia. I've worked with a few of them. You will rarely if ever hear about them because the first rule of businesss when you are making money is to shut up about it. Did you know that the world leader in tobacco handling equipment is Australian? Tool and cutter grinders and specialised machine tools used by Rolls Royce, GE, GM, Airbus and almost every other technology company in the world? There is one aerospace company I know where the owners buy new Ferrarris every year, they are so successful. There is a company only a few blocks from me that is the worlds leading producer of mega - super yacht hardware, yet nobody even knows of its existence. The only companies you hear about in the press are generally the unprofitable whiners.

3. The trouble is that once you get an infestation of narcissists in a business, I know of no way of purging them with the exception of almost killing the business. At that point they will leave in droves, like rats leaving a sinking ship, because they hate being associated with unattractive, unfashionable, non performing businesses, and they cannot and will not give of themselves to turn things around except by cost cutting. They like firing people. It makes them feel powerful.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2010, 17:20
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Za farzer land
Age: 53
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No wonder Qantas customers are leaving. All of these hi paying, hi yield passengers must be absolutely guttered when they board a 20 year old 74, 76 or 73 and play roulette on whether they are going to make their important meeting when the bogans are boarding a brand spanking new A320 and soon to be (for the first 15) brand spanking new B787s.

I think it shows absolute contempt to our customers and absolute disregard to the importance of our business traveller who IS the backbone to the continued success of this company. Like it or not, Alan Joyce has signed off on all new expansion of the "Qantas group" going the "leisure" travel way. Jetstar continue to get a new A320 every month for their bogans to pay $39 to go from MEL-SYD when Qantas still keep trudging away with the trusty ol 76.

It also makes me laugh when AJ keeps replying to the age of the Qantas fleet with how ever man billions of dollars of upgrade of aircraft on the way. I wonder just how much of those billions are "upgrades" and not just expansion for jetstar.

Unfortunately we lost our only chance of a great CEO who was a career Qantas man with passion for this company. He now works for Virgin. Just you watch the company go gang busters now.
Fruet Mich is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2010, 22:07
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cactusjack
Great stuff. Ma and Pa kettle are getting all hot and agitated under their tweed coats and panama hats watching their precious investment wither away. I hope they feel the same anger at the next shareholder love-in and decide not to be such a bunch of dumbf*#ks by agreeing to remunerate these executive toads with such ludicrous salaries and share options.
Originally Posted by BrissySparkyCoit
I think you will find "Ma and Pa kettle" are a very weak voice when it comes to Qantas investors. Institutional investors would have far greater say...... and many would be mates with the board/executive management"!!!
Is there any Australian public company where the shareholder vote on executive remuneration is actually binding? I don't think so...
VH-Cheer Up is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2010, 22:10
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Melbourne,Vic. Australia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Very thoughtful article in this morning's Age Newspaper. Worth a read.
Cunning_Stunt is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2010, 22:27
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fasten your seatbelts

Here is the link.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2010, 01:10
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Here's an example of what can happen in the outside world when employees save a company lots of money with good ideas.
THEY are rewarded, not bigger bonuses for the execs only.
From abc news site...
An employee ideas program has paid off in more ways than one, with massive christmas bonuses for 800 North Queensland workers.
At a lavish Christmas party in Townsville last night, 55 luxury cars and 700 Pacific island holidays were handed out to workers at the Yubulu Nickel Refinery.
Mining executive Clive Palmer says the rewards are well deserved as workers helped turn around the refinery, which had faced closure before his company bought the business last year.
Mr Palmer says the plant has gone from strength to strength, and employee efforts have contributed to around $16 million dollars in business savings.

Between you and me , readers I would suggest these folks are feeling decidedly engaged and would bend over backwards for Mr Palmer.He is of course a very wealthy man in a different business but this is a clear indication of how to do it.
ampclamp is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2010, 06:35
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 107
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
To whomever wrote that article, thank-you! Someone finally has articulated what we think in a concise and factual précis. I'll guarantee he had more than 150 hours!
maggotdriver is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2010, 05:55
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ampclamp: Excellent article, thanks. Note that his employees point out potential savings to Mr. Palmer, rather than vice versa. Big difference!
VH-Cheer Up is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2010, 06:31
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mining executive Clive Palmer says the rewards are well deserved as workers helped turn around the refinery, which had faced closure before his company bought the business last year.
Now there is a Mining Exec i would like to have on the Board of Qantas!
newsensation is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2010, 06:50
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
I dont think Mr P has much time for organised labour but if he looks after his people there is much less need for the protections of organised labour.
ampclamp is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.