Single pilot airline ops
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 49
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Single pilot airline ops
Just saw this on line 
Budget airline Ryanair considers single-pilot flights
Brazilian aircraft manufacturer Embraer is looking to provide single-pilot operation for commercial passenger jets in the 2020-2025 time frame.
By 2020, Embraer said, air-traffic control will be modernised in both the US and in Europe, and new technology will make the possible of one-person cockpits feasible. Whether it will be acceptable to the flying public is a different question, Embraer noted.
And Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary said he is going to ask regulators for permission to staff flights on his Irish airline with only one pilot - a big money-saving move.
Mr O'Leary told Bloomberg Businessweek that he does not think co-pilots are necessary on passenger planes.
"Why does every plane have two pilots? Really, you only need one pilot," Mr O'Leary said. "Let's take out the second pilot. Let the bloody computer fly it."
He suggested that in case of emergency a fight attendant on each plane could be trained to help with landing.
"If the pilot has an emergency, he rings the bell, he calls her in," O'Leary says. "She could take over."
There was outrage last year when the budget airline announced they were considering installing coin slots on toilet doors.
The airline was also criticised for charging passengers for making credit-card bookings, checking-in and putting extra luggage in the hold.
Mr O'Leary has also previously suggested "standing-only" flights.
Budget airline Ryanair considers single-pilot flights
- From: NewsCore
- September 09, 2010 10:52AM
Brazilian aircraft manufacturer Embraer is looking to provide single-pilot operation for commercial passenger jets in the 2020-2025 time frame.
By 2020, Embraer said, air-traffic control will be modernised in both the US and in Europe, and new technology will make the possible of one-person cockpits feasible. Whether it will be acceptable to the flying public is a different question, Embraer noted.
And Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary said he is going to ask regulators for permission to staff flights on his Irish airline with only one pilot - a big money-saving move.
Mr O'Leary told Bloomberg Businessweek that he does not think co-pilots are necessary on passenger planes.
"Why does every plane have two pilots? Really, you only need one pilot," Mr O'Leary said. "Let's take out the second pilot. Let the bloody computer fly it."
He suggested that in case of emergency a fight attendant on each plane could be trained to help with landing.
"If the pilot has an emergency, he rings the bell, he calls her in," O'Leary says. "She could take over."
There was outrage last year when the budget airline announced they were considering installing coin slots on toilet doors.
The airline was also criticised for charging passengers for making credit-card bookings, checking-in and putting extra luggage in the hold.
Mr O'Leary has also previously suggested "standing-only" flights.
kwit!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Roguesville, cloud cuckooland
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
5 Posts
Michael O'Leary is merely exhibiting the average knowledge of what pilots do that most expensively educated Airline managements currently have.
I doubt any flight attendants are taking the suggestion seriously either.
I doubt any flight attendants are taking the suggestion seriously either.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: new zealand
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why do we respond to this rubbish- it only encourages him.
BUT... give the number of flight attendants is mandated (actually so is the number of flight crew) by various CAA's as a per passenger ratio- what happens when the cabin crew/pilot gets called to the cockpit- now you don't meet the cabin crew rules! oops.
Oh well I suppose you could nominate one of the passengers at random or possibly select frequent flyers to undertake emergency cabin crew training so they could then step in to fill the vacency.
In fact you could charge enthusists to do the training and give them free flights- no wait - refunds IF they get called upon, or even better charge them for the privelage!
sorted.
Whats' this topic got to do with D&G anyway?
BUT... give the number of flight attendants is mandated (actually so is the number of flight crew) by various CAA's as a per passenger ratio- what happens when the cabin crew/pilot gets called to the cockpit- now you don't meet the cabin crew rules! oops.
Oh well I suppose you could nominate one of the passengers at random or possibly select frequent flyers to undertake emergency cabin crew training so they could then step in to fill the vacency.
In fact you could charge enthusists to do the training and give them free flights- no wait - refunds IF they get called upon, or even better charge them for the privelage!
sorted.Whats' this topic got to do with D&G anyway?
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back again.
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm fascinated by the stereotypical use by O'Leary of "he" for pilots and "she" for flight attendants. Straight out of the 50's. I wonder if he gets a rap on the knuckles from HR or if they just roll their eyes and go after easier targets.
Diving into the bunker.
Diving into the bunker.
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 63
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Me thinks that the Insurance Companies might have the final say......
Somewhere in the insurance policy will be something along the lines of "...aircraft to be operated in accordance with the approved flight manual ....."
Also, the TCDS A16WE which covers all the B737 series it has the following included for all series "Airplane operation must be in accordance with the FAA Approved AFM".
Somewhere in the AFM (don't have one to hand at the moment) it will state the normal operating crew compliment....shoud be 2.
Therefore, for Mr O'Leary to operate with one crew, he will be operating not in accordance with the AFM, and not in accordance with the TCDS, and therefore invalidating all his insurance policies......not a very wise business decision.......if he wants to do it he has to change the FAA's mind.....not an easy thing to do.
But don't let that get in the way of his plans...........
Somewhere in the insurance policy will be something along the lines of "...aircraft to be operated in accordance with the approved flight manual ....."
Also, the TCDS A16WE which covers all the B737 series it has the following included for all series "Airplane operation must be in accordance with the FAA Approved AFM".
Somewhere in the AFM (don't have one to hand at the moment) it will state the normal operating crew compliment....shoud be 2.
Therefore, for Mr O'Leary to operate with one crew, he will be operating not in accordance with the AFM, and not in accordance with the TCDS, and therefore invalidating all his insurance policies......not a very wise business decision.......if he wants to do it he has to change the FAA's mind.....not an easy thing to do.
But don't let that get in the way of his plans...........
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Age: 62
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you have missed the guts of the post.
1. Embraer design and build single pilot aircraft.
2. The local authorities revise the "rules" to allow single pilot ops under certain circumstances.
3. The major concern for pax is the single pilot being incapacitated and some one else "monitoring" the aircraft systems, I.e. A flight attendant.
Don't laugh though, it's not that far off. Aircraft can already fly with out pilots. The job of a single pilot on an aircraft won't be to fly it as we do now, it will be System man agent only, UNLESS there is a malfunction.
If the pilot has a " malfuncrtion" i suspect what O'leary is thinking, and I agree the mans a complete fool, is that they will train a flight attendant to jump in and monitor the systems.
That's the funny part, imagining a cart tart, galley hag having sufficient system knowledge through months of study to jump in and take over, and all for 20k a yr, today we call that person an F/Oa year.
1. Embraer design and build single pilot aircraft.
2. The local authorities revise the "rules" to allow single pilot ops under certain circumstances.
3. The major concern for pax is the single pilot being incapacitated and some one else "monitoring" the aircraft systems, I.e. A flight attendant.
Don't laugh though, it's not that far off. Aircraft can already fly with out pilots. The job of a single pilot on an aircraft won't be to fly it as we do now, it will be System man agent only, UNLESS there is a malfunction.
If the pilot has a " malfuncrtion" i suspect what O'leary is thinking, and I agree the mans a complete fool, is that they will train a flight attendant to jump in and monitor the systems.
That's the funny part, imagining a cart tart, galley hag having sufficient system knowledge through months of study to jump in and take over, and all for 20k a yr, today we call that person an F/Oa year.
This is such a silly idea Mr O'Leary!
You could save a heap more money by getting rid of all the flight attendants and then just have the CPT and F/O do the cabin service, err cabin sales, collect the pay per go loo service fee etc. The autopilot will look after the flying in the cruise - no problem!
You could save a heap more money by getting rid of all the flight attendants and then just have the CPT and F/O do the cabin service, err cabin sales, collect the pay per go loo service fee etc. The autopilot will look after the flying in the cruise - no problem!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A simple Google search showed at least 20 total incapacitation's of one of the pilots, whereas the other pilot took over and saved the day. With a fortified cockpit, if the one and only pilot decides to cark it, what happens then? The airline that I fly for, the door can only be opened from INSIDE the cockpit. 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The single pilot airliner is inevitable. Just as the two pilot airliner was.
If PPRUNE was around in the sixties, you could have found a thread just like this one - but that thread would have been about cutting the flight deck down to two pilots!
To those harping on about endorsements and regulations: the rules (and the aircraft) will be changed to suit.
If PPRUNE was around in the sixties, you could have found a thread just like this one - but that thread would have been about cutting the flight deck down to two pilots!
To those harping on about endorsements and regulations: the rules (and the aircraft) will be changed to suit.
As I've stated on another thread, MOL believes in the saying 'there's no such thing as bad publicity'. He deliberately makes these ridiculous statements, carefully timed, so that he and his company are 'in the news' constantly, for free.
Some I remember include 'charging for use of the aircraft toilets', Ryanair staff to nick free pens from hotels (saving company money), recently 'stand up cabins' to accommodate more passengers, and now 'single pilot airliners'.
The man may be a tw-t, but he's not a stupid tw-t.
Incidentally, a recent 'Flight' magazine included an article about Embraer's study on potential highly-automated, single-pilot cockpits...
Some I remember include 'charging for use of the aircraft toilets', Ryanair staff to nick free pens from hotels (saving company money), recently 'stand up cabins' to accommodate more passengers, and now 'single pilot airliners'.
The man may be a tw-t, but he's not a stupid tw-t.
Incidentally, a recent 'Flight' magazine included an article about Embraer's study on potential highly-automated, single-pilot cockpits...
This subject is running elsewhere here but I think it's fair to say that we won't see SP Ops in Airlines for a loooooooooooooong time yet!
And as for having min cabin crew on duty as per Regs then having one go to the pointy end to save the day there by leaving the cabin with not enough F/A's due regs could easily be rectified by leaving the cockpit door open therefore making the cabin & cockpit as one
I can see it now. A320 in crz. F/A responds to ATC req's to trk dct to xxx to resume the star then min speed to fit in with the rest of the planes. She sets up the arrival as per the Co Ops. Then she goes into the perf page activates App then configs the plane making sure the LS is selected & hard tuned. Changes freq & alt's as req'd (all in managed of coure) as she goes making sure she doen't exceed F speed/s completes chk list A/P off at say 100 ft retard at say 30 ft checks ROD touches down smoothly selects full rev,makes sure Splrs, Auto brk & decel all good & comes to a stop & applies PB, yep easy peezy & all done after serving 180 bogans coffee!!!
Wmk2
And as for having min cabin crew on duty as per Regs then having one go to the pointy end to save the day there by leaving the cabin with not enough F/A's due regs could easily be rectified by leaving the cockpit door open therefore making the cabin & cockpit as one
I can see it now. A320 in crz. F/A responds to ATC req's to trk dct to xxx to resume the star then min speed to fit in with the rest of the planes. She sets up the arrival as per the Co Ops. Then she goes into the perf page activates App then configs the plane making sure the LS is selected & hard tuned. Changes freq & alt's as req'd (all in managed of coure) as she goes making sure she doen't exceed F speed/s completes chk list A/P off at say 100 ft retard at say 30 ft checks ROD touches down smoothly selects full rev,makes sure Splrs, Auto brk & decel all good & comes to a stop & applies PB, yep easy peezy & all done after serving 180 bogans coffee!!!
Wmk2
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary said he is going to ask regulators for permission to staff flights on his Irish airline with only one pilot - a big money-saving move.
Profits before lives; we all know where that ends up.
I agree. The technology is available now to have pilotless aircraft. In fact in the military these are in use as spy aircraft already,and better,larger types are on the drawing board right now.
Ofcourse no passenger would fly without someone being up front nor would any regulator allow it,or should they,but the fact remains it could be done. Single pilot ops are a certainty one day in my view. Maybe not in 10 or 20years but it is coming. Computers will do all the work and the pilot will only be there in case of emergencies or other malfunction.
If you want to an example just look at the latest trains such as the Magna train in Shanghai. All run by computer with one driver riding shotgun for safety.
Just as the Flight engineer dissappeared so will the second pilot.
Ofcourse no passenger would fly without someone being up front nor would any regulator allow it,or should they,but the fact remains it could be done. Single pilot ops are a certainty one day in my view. Maybe not in 10 or 20years but it is coming. Computers will do all the work and the pilot will only be there in case of emergencies or other malfunction.
If you want to an example just look at the latest trains such as the Magna train in Shanghai. All run by computer with one driver riding shotgun for safety.
Just as the Flight engineer dissappeared so will the second pilot.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Roguesville, cloud cuckooland
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
5 Posts
Those aircraft aren't pilotless. Don't confuse unmanned with pilotless. and you wouldn't believe their loss rate..with a fully qualified air force pilot flying them.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fancy Embraer of all companies chiming in with this rubbish. Their airplanes don't even fly with two pilots. They should concentrate on their reliability first and come up with stupid innovations later.
Ejunk.
Ejunk.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Australian ran this story too.
Co-pilots are unnecessary - Ryanair's Michael O'Leary says | The Australian
We once had a flight attendant claim the CSM should be second in charge of the aircraft with FO 3rd in charge. When asked how she would handle an engine failure with an incapacitated captain, she quickly withdrew her statement.
Co-pilots are unnecessary - Ryanair's Michael O'Leary says | The Australian
We once had a flight attendant claim the CSM should be second in charge of the aircraft with FO 3rd in charge. When asked how she would handle an engine failure with an incapacitated captain, she quickly withdrew her statement.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We once had a flight attendant
I thank god for my ipod so I don't have to listen to their rubbish on the crew bus.