The Worm Is turning
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dununda
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Worm Is turning
In America at Least
After being stuck in a plane on the tarmac for nine hours in 2006, Kate Hanni decided to fight back against poor customer service. She formed the group Flyerrights.org, which in December was successful in getting the DOT to issue a rule on “enhancing airline passenger protections” that includes limiting airlines to three hours on the tarmac before requiring that the aircraft allow passengers to disembark and requiring airlines to provide adequate food and water to passengers within two hours of them being stuck in a plane. A DOT spokeswoman says the rule will become effective on April 29, after the department reviews requests from certain carriers who have asked for temporary exemptions.
After being stuck in a plane on the tarmac for nine hours in 2006, Kate Hanni decided to fight back against poor customer service. She formed the group Flyerrights.org, which in December was successful in getting the DOT to issue a rule on “enhancing airline passenger protections” that includes limiting airlines to three hours on the tarmac before requiring that the aircraft allow passengers to disembark and requiring airlines to provide adequate food and water to passengers within two hours of them being stuck in a plane. A DOT spokeswoman says the rule will become effective on April 29, after the department reviews requests from certain carriers who have asked for temporary exemptions.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ˙ǝqɐq ǝɯ ʇ,uıɐ ʇɐɥʇ 'sɔıʇɐqoɹǝɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɯɐu ɹıǝɥʇ ʇnd ǝɯos
Age: 45
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I remember being stuck in an aircraft on the ground as a pax about 15 years ago for just over 2 hours (between Montana and Phoenix I think). The level of concern from the cabin crew was OK for a while but waned significantly after about 30 minutes.
I had a friendly chat to one of the flight attendants who told me that they didn't get paid for time spent on the ground in excess of the normal rostered ground time and that that probably lead to a bit of apathy for our plight in terms of comfort etc.
I wonder if this is still the case back there (US)? What about Oz? Anyone?
FRQ CB
I had a friendly chat to one of the flight attendants who told me that they didn't get paid for time spent on the ground in excess of the normal rostered ground time and that that probably lead to a bit of apathy for our plight in terms of comfort etc.
I wonder if this is still the case back there (US)? What about Oz? Anyone?
FRQ CB
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some years ago, a friend of mine, accompanied by his wife and infant child, were being held on an aircraft parked at the gate, somewhere in Asia, ie hot. There was a tech problem which was taking ages to rectify and the air-conditioning was off. He asked the crew to allow his family to go into the terminal, but was refused. He then told the Chief Purser to inform the Captain that if they were not allowed off the aircraft, he would call the British Embassy and inform them that he was being "detained against his will."
He was allowed off forthwith! (And allowed back on when the jet had been fixed.)
He was allowed off forthwith! (And allowed back on when the jet had been fixed.)
I was on QF 1 ex NY JFK - pushed off the gate at 2330 and arrived back at the gate at 1130. Did not leave the tarmac.
It's QF108 by the way
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Transition Layer:
Or perhaps the FAA were doing ramp checks ? Maybe the airport staff were changing a bulb on 31L ? Or perhaps Air Force One made an unexpected diversion to the airport ?
So many possibilities,the list is endless.
And the rest of the facts? Snowstorm, Thunderstorms, tech issue?
So many possibilities,the list is endless.
Nunc est bibendum
You guys have obviously never been to JFK. I've only been there once. Weather was fine, there was no significant disruption at the airport. Aircraft pushed back on time and we were airborne an hour and a quarter later.
With the QF108 example provided (it was snowing bucket loads if it's the day I'm thinking of), the decision to return to blox was made about the seven hour mark. It took the remaining five hours to get back to the gate.
Take a shot by all means if we deserve it. On that particular day, every airline in and out of JFK got done over.
With the QF108 example provided (it was snowing bucket loads if it's the day I'm thinking of), the decision to return to blox was made about the seven hour mark. It took the remaining five hours to get back to the gate.
Take a shot by all means if we deserve it. On that particular day, every airline in and out of JFK got done over.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Keg:
Yes, that was the day. The record breaking snowstorm and all. It wasn't so much the 11 or 12 hours on the tarmac, it was the lies. As someone remarked 'Not Qantas' finest hour".
You just had to be there...
Yes, that was the day. The record breaking snowstorm and all. It wasn't so much the 11 or 12 hours on the tarmac, it was the lies. As someone remarked 'Not Qantas' finest hour".
You just had to be there...
Sprucegoose
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I suspect the new rule would not apply to QF 108 scenario, as the aircraft was pushed back and technically underway!
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: InDahAir
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Over 800 take-offs from JFK...never delayed for more than an hour in 19 years of US and international operations.
Just lucky I guess!
I cannot for the life of me see any excuse for QF 108 being stuck there for anywhere near that length of time; if indeed the story is true.
Just lucky I guess!
I cannot for the life of me see any excuse for QF 108 being stuck there for anywhere near that length of time; if indeed the story is true.