Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

The Worm Is turning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 00:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dununda
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Worm Is turning

In America at Least

After being stuck in a plane on the tarmac for nine hours in 2006, Kate Hanni decided to fight back against poor customer service. She formed the group Flyerrights.org, which in December was successful in getting the DOT to issue a rule on “enhancing airline passenger protections” that includes limiting airlines to three hours on the tarmac before requiring that the aircraft allow passengers to disembark and requiring airlines to provide adequate food and water to passengers within two hours of them being stuck in a plane. A DOT spokeswoman says the rule will become effective on April 29, after the department reviews requests from certain carriers who have asked for temporary exemptions.
surfside6 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 00:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ˙ǝqɐq ǝɯ ʇ,uıɐ ʇɐɥʇ 'sɔıʇɐqoɹǝɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɯɐu ɹıǝɥʇ ʇnd ǝɯos
Age: 45
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember being stuck in an aircraft on the ground as a pax about 15 years ago for just over 2 hours (between Montana and Phoenix I think). The level of concern from the cabin crew was OK for a while but waned significantly after about 30 minutes.

I had a friendly chat to one of the flight attendants who told me that they didn't get paid for time spent on the ground in excess of the normal rostered ground time and that that probably lead to a bit of apathy for our plight in terms of comfort etc.

I wonder if this is still the case back there (US)? What about Oz? Anyone?

FRQ CB
FRQ Charlie Bravo is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 04:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some years ago, a friend of mine, accompanied by his wife and infant child, were being held on an aircraft parked at the gate, somewhere in Asia, ie hot. There was a tech problem which was taking ages to rectify and the air-conditioning was off. He asked the crew to allow his family to go into the terminal, but was refused. He then told the Chief Purser to inform the Captain that if they were not allowed off the aircraft, he would call the British Embassy and inform them that he was being "detained against his will."
He was allowed off forthwith! (And allowed back on when the jet had been fixed.)

Neptunus Rex is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2010, 09:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was on QF 1 ex NY JFK - pushed off the gate at 2330 and arrived back at the gate at 1130. Did not leave the tarmac.
sprocket check is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2010, 10:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,573
Received 88 Likes on 34 Posts
I was on QF 1 ex NY JFK - pushed off the gate at 2330 and arrived back at the gate at 1130. Did not leave the tarmac.
And the rest of the facts? Snowstorm, Thunderstorms, tech issue?

It's QF108 by the way
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2010, 11:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Transition Layer:
And the rest of the facts? Snowstorm, Thunderstorms, tech issue?
Or perhaps the FAA were doing ramp checks ? Maybe the airport staff were changing a bulb on 31L ? Or perhaps Air Force One made an unexpected diversion to the airport ?
So many possibilities,the list is endless.
Cactusjack is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2010, 07:58
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF1 or 108 is merely a typing shortcut, it is quite irrelevant.

And the rest of the facts? Snowstorm, Thunderstorms, tech issue?

Also irrelevant. Were you there too?
sprocket check is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2010, 09:31
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NZ
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No amount of "fact's" could justify 11hrs on board to then redock at the departure gate.... that's criminal.
Sqwark2000 is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2010, 14:52
  #9 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs down

You guys have obviously never been to JFK. I've only been there once. Weather was fine, there was no significant disruption at the airport. Aircraft pushed back on time and we were airborne an hour and a quarter later.

With the QF108 example provided (it was snowing bucket loads if it's the day I'm thinking of), the decision to return to blox was made about the seven hour mark. It took the remaining five hours to get back to the gate.

Take a shot by all means if we deserve it. On that particular day, every airline in and out of JFK got done over.
Keg is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2010, 15:37
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keg:

Yes, that was the day. The record breaking snowstorm and all. It wasn't so much the 11 or 12 hours on the tarmac, it was the lies. As someone remarked 'Not Qantas' finest hour".

You just had to be there...
sprocket check is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2010, 06:48
  #11 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I suspect the new rule would not apply to QF 108 scenario, as the aircraft was pushed back and technically underway!
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2010, 21:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Er yes it would. That's the reason they created the law.
DUXNUTZ is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2010, 02:11
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: InDahAir
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Over 800 take-offs from JFK...never delayed for more than an hour in 19 years of US and international operations.

Just lucky I guess!

I cannot for the life of me see any excuse for QF 108 being stuck there for anywhere near that length of time; if indeed the story is true.
Kangaroo Court is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2010, 13:47
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alright, if you want to, read it here:

SMH story

There is quite a bit more to add, this is only about 20% of what happened...
sprocket check is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.