Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

F/A Falls from Qantas Aircraft at Uluru

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

F/A Falls from Qantas Aircraft at Uluru

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Mar 2010, 03:46
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Perth
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oils aint Oils my friend

"Opening the doors from the inside while armed will blow the slide ( obviously )
Opening from the outside will disarm the slide if left armed and thus prevent and accidental activation."

Hey Nitpicker330... better learn your door systems buddy. Opening the 717 door from the outside does not disarm the slide and many other airliners are the same
oil additive is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2010, 11:26
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah I was talking about big planes, not those Tonka Toyz you boys drive!!

Still, if they left the door opening and closing to the ground staff the FA wouldn't have fallen out would she?

Mmm
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2010, 12:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,556
Received 75 Likes on 43 Posts
I was talking about big planes, not those Tonka Toyz you boys drive!!
At least we do drive them...
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2010, 17:48
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: right now.....in front of the computer
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I was talking about big planes, not those Tonka Toyz you boys drive!!
and here I was thinking the B737 was same cat as 717??

And atm if anyone wants to go to AYQ, they got no choice but to go QF/NJS. Good to see you guys are operating unity....or not.

P.S. Nitpicker, if I worked @ QF, I would put my size 12 fair dinkum where the sun don't shine when it comes to your attitude.

Last edited by High-Bypass; 10th Mar 2010 at 18:03.
High-Bypass is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2010, 03:59
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: S37.54 E145.11
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
High-bypass

...if anyone wants to go to AYQ, they got no choice but to go QF/NJS
Not any more; the rumour is VB is starting a daily SYD-AYQ service in August.
QSK? is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2010, 06:20
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Perth
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Nitpicker, I was playing nicely, but you're obviously a tosser!

FYI - I don't fly em, I fix em and I've fixed everything up to and including 747's

I reckon you should get yourself into Air Safety Investigation... you're a natural
oil additive is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2010, 09:27
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hey settle it was meant tongue in cheek................sorry if I offended.

I'd actually like to fly a 717 or 73 around Oz again, I think you've got a nice gig and given half a chance I'd swap jobs any day. Although multple 5 sector days might wear a little thin after a while.

back to the topic now.........
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2010, 09:41
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: asia
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Careful Nit, those charter boys are a bit sensitive
hongkongfooey is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2010, 22:42
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
5 sector days
I haven't ever done one of those.
3 is the normal maximum with 2 being standard 9 -11 days a month.
RENURPP is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2010, 09:45
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Regardless of anything else - DON'T BLOODY MOVE THE STAIRS UNTIL THE DOOR IS CLOSED!
YPJT is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2010, 12:36
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its not Uluru,Its Farking AYERS ROCK.!!!!!!politicly sensitve wa%^$#s
bush mechanics is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 08:58
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
qf policy not to open a door without correct stand or steps in place.
No guarantee the stairs were correct/serviceable and the door could not be closed wthout moving them.Hard enough to get correct equipment in YSSY let alone in the boonies.Maybe just an honest mistake.

I hope the FA is ok, anyone heard lately?
ampclamp is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 10:22
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
The stairs were 100% serviceable.
The door wasn't opened until the stairs were in place, although the 717 is not operated by QF so their policy has little relevance to what the CC did, however QF policy certainly would be reflected in COBHAM policy.
QF policy should have been followd by groundstaff. The stairs were removed whilst the door was still open, it really is quite simple. It was a mistake.

The CC is OK considering. More tests to determine the longer term outcome.
RENURPP is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 22:43
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
thanks renurpp for the background info.Glad the f/a is ok.Could have been much worse.
ampclamp is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2010, 10:45
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,878
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 106 Posts
DON'T BLOODY MOVE THE STAIRS UNTIL THE DOOR IS CLOSED!
On some aircraft the door CANNOT be closed until the steps are moved.

Some steps require that they are moved to allow the door to be closed.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 00:20
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Some steps require that they are moved to allow the door to be closed
Yes and for those types, specific SOPs are also in place. We are talking about a B-717 though. I agree with RENURPP in that it was a simple mistake that I have also witnessed on occasion but this time with the unfortunate result that the established procedures were designed to prevent.
YPJT is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 00:31
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,556
Received 75 Likes on 43 Posts
And as experience levels continue to decline, it is even more essential that SOPs be followed to prevent this sort of thing. I wonder how many times this has occurred (stairs being removed prematurely) before the incident, and if so why didn't anybody say "hey, what are you doing"?

I suspect though that yet another rule will be created to "fix" the problem.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 01:17
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I suspect though that yet another rule will be created to "fix" the problem
Spot on Bloggsie!
I just read an Qantas safety notice that says the ground crew member is to be on the top of the platform or stairs and witness the door being closed. What they couldn't do that just as easily from the bottom of the stairs?
This blameless culture sucks. Everything is at fault except the individual/s that caused the problem.
YPJT is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 01:37
  #39 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by YPJT
This blameless culture sucks. Everything is at fault except the individual/s that caused the problem.
I'm not privy to any details as to how this accident happened, or who is at fault.

My experience both within and without the aviation industry is that with most cock-ups the individual at the end of the chain is in the spotlight, and this focus is used to absolve those higher up the chain from any shared responsibility, or from doing anything meaningful to prevent a reoccurrence.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 02:21
  #40 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
QF doesn't have a 'no blame' framework, we have a 'just culture' framework. There is a subtle but significant difference.

Was this a 737 or a 717? If it was the latter will it be Cobham that looks at how this went pear shaped or will QF safety get involved?
Keg is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.