Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

VB hires Ejet Direct Entry Captains

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

VB hires Ejet Direct Entry Captains

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Nov 2009, 08:14
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Outback
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyway ladies - lets get the thread back on track ....

So whats the latest news ?
littlehurcules is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2009, 22:54
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Easy Peazy,
Just keep lowering the acceptable standards until the pass rate reaches requirements.
Sausage factory pilot training ONE-0-ONE.
That's sure to improve KPI's
Now where's my bonus!
blow.n.gasket is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2009, 05:09
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in them thar hills
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aviation is chock-ful of arbitrary writing. Most all Ops Manuals have arbitrary minimums like 1500 hours to start, 3500 hours for a command etc. But then go on to say that the company can vary it if the mood suits.
Many numbers quoted in the regulations are also arbitrary. 500ft vertically and 2000ft horizontally from cloud is one such example that has been with us for many years. How to measure it in flight? How to enforce the unenforceable?
The practise here of quoting sections of statements is a bit like selective TV journalism. Like where they interview someone and get a full statement, but only air snippets to make their own case or to make the other person look bad.

Last edited by gas-chamber; 17th Nov 2009 at 01:22.
gas-chamber is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2009, 21:18
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: I'veBeenEverywhereMan
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Well Apparently the two direct entry captains have started and the company has not responded to the afap's letters to confirm this. (thats from the afap themselves)
Very disappointing. Piss off 800 pilots to bring in 2. (Who will be as popular as .....well you guys get it.)
SilverSleuth is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2009, 23:40
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,305
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
If that's the case, then why aren't the AFAP and the company already in the IRC?

Perhaps once the "letter" from DJ confirms the appointment, that's exactly were they will be.
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 00:00
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: fantasy island
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps once the "letter" from DJ confirms the appointment, that's exactly were they will be.
.............and then what? VB are permitted to employ DEC, it's written into the agreement.

The only way to "fix" this problem is to take industrial action and get serious about objecting to being pushed around by Management.

Can you see that happening Krusty..............no, I didn't think so.
BAE146 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 01:14
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Outback
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where is that written in the agreement??

Did they take "all steps" required before employing DEC??
littlehurcules is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 09:14
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: australia
Age: 46
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That was a well negotiated EBA. Allows for provisions of DEC's.

Everyone must be pretty happy with the AFAP over that!
balibo is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 10:55
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: AUSTRALIA - CHINA STHN
Age: 59
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seniority and Career Path

hey guys - just going to have to wind you up here but what is wrong with DEc's?

If you were to ask anyone in the other than aviation world about promotions etc it is based around the best man for the job principle.

yes I know aviation is different but the travelling public dont see it that way - they expect the best and most qualified pilots to be driving them around... they are in no way concerned with who got the number from the KFC que first..so with that in mind if a company can get a qualified , experienced captain or crew externally and not pay rating costs etc then so be it. I would expect the shareholders would see if that way...

Of course trying to explain to punters that the pilot profession is unlike others and we cant just transfer around is another thing altogether...

will await incoming for making such a bold statement that bypasses the sacred seniority cow... I would think VB would know what their legal options to employ DECS is before doing so..maybe??

WJA
woodja51 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 19:02
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would think VB would know what their legal options to employ DECS is before doing so..maybe??
one would asume that they would know their LEGAL obligations!
However, you can do whatever the hell you like, when there is no one to fight you.
Who is going to take VB management to court to fight this? VIPA? AFAP? independant group of pilots?

Management KNOw that they can ride roughshod over the EBA, and will continue to do so until such time as SOMEBODY has the b@lls to stand up to them.

and it is NOT just VB. Any company in the world who knows that something is dodgy, but cheap will do so IF they think that they can get away with it. Can you imagine being a fly on the wall at the manpower meeting:
manager A: "ok, we can save $xxxx by empoloying DEC's off the street ahead instead of upgrading others"
Manager B: " the pilot body won't like that!!!"
Manager A: " yeah I know. but what are THEY gonna do about it? "
Manager B: "................... ummm............. yeah................. I see your point."
apache is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 20:02
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you were to ask anyone in the other than aviation world about promotions etc it is based around the best man for the job principle....yes I know aviation is different
Agree with your post woodja51. Except for the bit about aviation being different? How is it different?

Seniority is driving down terms and conditions as it dilutes an individuals competitive advantage. Seniority is a contributing factor to the decline in the industry, while other executive roles continue to go from strength to strength.

A clear example of this was the extreme shortage of pilots 2 years ago yet there was no significant increase in terms and conditions. Why? Because experienced captains could not enter airlines at the command level - rather join at the bottom. Think about it.
rescue 1 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 20:07
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Brisvegas
Age: 46
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any competent pilot with 1000 hours Metro and 500 jet should be able to make command on ANY contemporary civil jet. Contrary to what some would believe, all modern jets are pisseasy to fly.
Absolutely, generally the more modern the aircraft the easier they are to fly. However, it's not the A to B in fine weather sectors that demand the crew to draw on years of experience....it's the days when things are not really going to plan. 500 hours on a Jet is NOT enough to make a competent captain. In my opinion, we had it right years before JetStar and Virgin....when joining airlines like Ansett, Qantas, TAA meant many years in the right seat (and back seat) before the opportunity for command came up. After 10 years or so as F/O, there is plenty of experience the fall back on once you become a junior captain.
Tempo is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 23:30
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shivering in the cold dark shadow of my own magnificence.
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes I know aviation is different but the travelling public dont see it that way - they expect the best and most qualified pilots to be driving them around
Surely the best & most qualified pilot in this case (An established airline) is the person who has spent several years with a company learning the routes, manuals, procedures, aircraft etc.

Make no mistake, this sort of move has absolutely nothing to do with safety and everything to do with economic convenience. It costs a few bucks & a couple of months to train F/O's; & F/O position on an Emb is an unpopular/difficult position to fill due to being underpaid.

Seniority is driving down terms and conditions as it dilutes an individuals competitive advantage. Seniority is a contributing factor to the decline in the industry, while other executive roles continue to go from strength to strength.
That's truly the most stupid thing that I've ever seen written anywhere in the history of the written language.

Are you seriously suggesting that collective bargaining should be dropped in preference to individual contracts? Perhaps we should be more like GA, individualism has worked well there.
psycho joe is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 01:22
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would suggest collective bargaining and seniority are two very different subjects.

Many organisations bargain collectively and also have a competitive promotion system. It's about getting the best person for the job, not the next in line for it.

A seniority list protects those towards the bottom of a 'food chain' and leaves those near the top with little or no bargaining power.

Think about it for a minute.... If you could tell VB to get stuffed and slot in at the same level (or higher) at JQ, QF, CX or the Kitty Cat you have bargaining power. Or, if a disgruntled REX Captain could move over to QF Link at the same level, he has bargaining power. At the moment management know you won't leave in droves (generally) because you'll have to start at the bottom as a SO or FO somewhere else. Changing jobs is like starting a new career (for Pilots) because of the seniority systems in place at most airlines. I suppose the exception is contract flying or a DEC position of course

If there is going to be a "real" pilot shortage in a few years time then removing seniority lists may well be the best way to drive up T&C's for experienced crew
Grogbog is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 03:02
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eastside
Posts: 636
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting rid of seniority certainly does not guarantee that the company gets the best people for the job. It opens up the opportunity for nepotism (which of course can happen in any non-seniority based company, whether aviation or not), but more specifically, the awarding of positions for purely commercial reasons. This is more unique to aviation because the training costs are so much higher, as has been mentioned. In this economic day and age, why would a company then choose to promote from within?

T&C's would most likely go down, due to the increased supply of pilots returning from o/s. Once they run out, companies will lobby for more 457 visas. In turn this leads to a pilot group who has no incentive to improve conditions (retiring soon or company sponsored). Currently this happens with startups, imagine if their (Tiger, VA, etc) T&C's were the norm?
grrowler is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 08:44
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shivering in the cold dark shadow of my own magnificence.
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many organisations bargain collectively and also have a competitive promotion system. It's about getting the best person for the job, not the next in line for it.
I'm sure that's true, but I've never seen an airline pilot in Australia receive a command just because they were next in line.


Think about it for a minute.... If you could tell VB to get stuffed and slot in at the same level (or higher) at JQ, QF, CX or the Kitty Cat you have bargaining power. Or, if a disgruntled REX Captain could move over to QF Link at the same level, he has bargaining power. At the moment management know you won't leave in droves (generally) because you'll have to start at the bottom as a SO or FO somewhere else. Changing jobs is like starting a new career (for Pilots) because of the seniority systems in place at most airlines. I suppose the exception is contract flying or a DEC position of course
I agree that's awesome if you're a line Captain or higher & don't mind saying to hell with the last vestiges of industry cohesion amongst your compatriots.

Whilst captains are playing musical chairs their expat counterparts would surely flood the market to get home (who wouldn't) = Lower conditions.

FO's & SO's would forever stagnate unless they find that elusive command time & so will go to the lowest paid operator to do so or worse still, enter into a payment agreement for command time = Lower conditions.

However I do admit that my hypocrisy knows no bounds, in so far as I believe that Pilots leaving an Australian airline to work as an expatriate should be allowed a window of opportunity to return with diminishing seniority commensurate with time absent. This would reduce the incidence of expats accepting lower T&C's just to return home.
psycho joe is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 09:16
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
A clear example of this was the extreme shortage of pilots 2 years ago yet there was no significant increase in terms and conditions. Why? Because experienced captains could not enter airlines at the command level - rather join at the bottom. Think about it.
No. Airlines seemed happy to cancel flights and contract their businesses in a time of massive expansion rather than pay more money to retain pilots. REX also tried to get 457 visas but discovered that they were paying below the minimum salary to qualify!! That's what really happened.

Over in WA the same would have happened except that I think the mining companies who have had the gun held to their heads in terms of salaries may put some subtle pressure on the charter operators to start paying some decent coin.

What we also saw was a ridiculous reduction of the minimum requirements that were once apparently written in stone.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 23:15
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sydney,NSW,Australia
Age: 44
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

Sorry guys, didnt read this thread till just now, and couldn't be bothered re-reading the same arguments so I may be repeating someone else however.

Why is everyone so surprised VB is not treating their pilots well, they chose most of you guys because you were the first lot of guys that were willing to pay for your own training in a time when this was not the norm, just so you could call yourself an airline pilot, and jump ahead of the guys above you with real experience and morals, Then after the training that you paid for you were paid a lower than average salary for an airline job in that day. The management at VB picked most of you for your morals not your experience so that could use this to control the pilot group in the future.

I have a number of friends in there, even they have commented on this and you cant make a stand on anything because there are enough people in VB that will sell you out for your position, which is a shame because there are a lot of great guys and girls there too.

You guys made the bed :-), now your complaining again come on. its life same way you got in others are getting in, it's the true VB way.

and to head a couple of comments off, No I have never applied, and never will apply I have a good job!

(Ducking now)
Captain Kellogs is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 23:24
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is everyone so surprised VB is not treating their pilots well, they chose most of you guys because you were the first lot of guys that were willing to pay for your own training in a time when this was not the norm
Incorrect.....National Joke Systems started that........

I have a number of friends in there, even they have commented on this and you cant make a stand on anything because there are enough people in VB that will sell you out for your position
As is the norm in this industry.....Pilots are there own worst enemy..
Wellhung Unit is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 23:31
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: fantasy island
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hear Hear Captain K !

No need to duck as you speak the truth and another thing. There are a number of Captains on the 737 and JJet that got their Commands, shall we say, out of "seniority" order so the precedent had been already set for DECs.

You see in this game you cannot say one thing and do another when it suits. Play by the rules ALL the time and you won't have a problem.

Unfortunately the rules were set a long time ago and there ain't no turning back now. As Captain Kellogs has alluded to - you guys made your bed and now you are going to have to lay in it.
BAE146 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.