Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas To The Middle East.Why Not?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas To The Middle East.Why Not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Oct 2009, 14:54
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: PENang, Malaysia
Posts: 159
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cool EK/QF Codeshare

Back in the 90's, when Ek first started MEL-SIN-DXB, they codeshared with QF. Unfortunately when it came to renew the agreement, there was a slight disagreement, and QF was rebuffed.
History since then speaks for itself.
Three Wire is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2009, 23:16
  #22 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,095
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would have thought QF would be able to get back into Bahrain without much trouble, now that GF is just a Bahrain owned airline?

I was very surprised when QF pulled out of Athens, presumably very little premium traffic? Same with Rome?
parabellum is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2009, 00:38
  #23 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
The Athens decision years ago has to do with the bi-lateral agreement with the Greek government. The way I understood it was that the Greek government set the fares as well as the number of seats and thus Olympic would always be cheaper than QF. That could be urban myth but Athens has barely rated a mention in QF talk since the mid '90s for various reasons. As you say, a high rate of VFR traffic (and thus low yield) probably played a large part also.
Keg is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2009, 00:53
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 35
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I work with QF myself and have heard that they will be starting a 747 service to bah (bahrain) then a shuttle service to auh (abu dhabi). this will compete with the likes of Qatar which start flying to syd in nov. Also no other carriers fly to aus from bahrain.
timmi812 is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2009, 02:33
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: on skybeds
Age: 43
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a shuttle

out of bahrain to abu dabi on a 747. now thats a good rumour
skybed is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2009, 03:17
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Plenty of passengers of Middle Eastern origin in the western suburbs of Sydney. Trouble is many of them hate Australia and all it stands for.
They'd probably travel on ANYOTHER Airlines before QF.
Metro man is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2009, 04:07
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 58
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tell him he's dreaming.
ditch handle is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2009, 06:33
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Skybed,

If they could fill a shuttle service's hold with freight, it might work; EK run around the Gulf with wide-bodies because (as they've said) they'll happily run a 777 with no pax if they can fill the hold.

EK make $$$ because they are at a hub point - their original plan was to be the main carrier between Europe (especially the UK) and the subcontinent. They knew that Air India and PIA would never be able to offer (and fill) direct services between lots of their cities and lots of places in Europe - but if you hub in Dubai, then Robert's your mother's brother.

Their business model has expanded as aircraft ranges have increased. But don't forget, there's a reason they've earmarked most of their planned A380s not to have first class. And that reason is that we'll never see those airframes further from Dubai than the subcontinent.

So... all this talk about Qantas going to the ME is looking at one route this side of Dubai, and one route out the other. Which probably won't yield enough.

Would it perhaps not be better to play them a bit at their own game and use Dubai as an alliance hub - that is, QF and CX fly in on one side, and meet Iberia, BA and Finnair services on the other side, through to more than just Madrid, London and Helsinki - use the EU freedoms to operate between Dubai and ports outside their home countries. So if I want to go from Sydney to say Stockholm using oneworld, rather than go through Singapore and either Helsinki or London, I could run QF to Dubai and change to a Finnair.

I could do just that now with Emirates.

Or, get a Gulf carrier into OW and use them to do all the European city runs.

But this won't happen...
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2009, 21:48
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brisbane
Age: 56
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A rumour!

I'm just pleased to see some actual rumours in this thread. I love a good rumour!

How about Melbourne - Broome - Athens while we're at it? A bit of work to improve the facilities at Broome, but no need to make an intermediate stop in some other country. (OK, I apologise for my rumour quality, maybe someone can think up some better rumours?)

;-)
Explicitus is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2009, 04:51
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: on skybeds
Age: 43
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Taildragger

your argument makes sense. Qf management would never come up with those ideas.
skybed is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2009, 06:39
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dunedin, NZ
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If a stop in the Middle East is just somewhere for passengers to buy a postcard, why not Dubai, or there is good old Bahrain, which worked quite well for many years for Qantas. In fact which ever airport gives a good deal for fuel and handling charges.

My experience as a passenger, when I get out at Singapore, HK or KL (I have not done BKK) is that very few of my fellow passengers are getting out. They hang around the terminal and go straight to London, UK. They may buy souvenirs.

Bahrain or Abu Dhabi do have an advantage that Qantas just might sell a few local seats from there to London, and some of those seats might be in the First Class part of the plane, so nice bit of pocket money for Qantas.
alangirvan is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2009, 09:14
  #32 (permalink)  
Wod
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: An old flying boat station on Moreton Bay
Age: 84
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've been staying out of this but.....

The gulf carriers, Etihad, Qatar, Emirates, have a substantial market into Europe.

Australian Governments of all persuasions, cheerfully give away traffic rights to foreign carriers to promote tourism. They certainly don't protect Australian, or Kiwi carriers.

So, with modern, long range aircraft a gulf carrier can offer one-stop service to a myriad European destinations. Think IST, ATH, ROM, MAD, PAR, MAN, DUB...the list goes on. Very attractive to some Australians.

QF and Virgin (whether Atlantic or not), can only make sense of hubs based on SIN, KUL,BKK,HKG, where you can feed people in from all Australian ports, most of whom get off at the hub port, but enough go on to LHR or FRA to make the hub effective.

QF don't do Middle East because it makes no economic sense.

But codeshare with Etihad does make sense.
Wod is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2009, 09:48
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I said previously, Qantas will go to the Middle East only if they can continue on to London and these services are daily.

This has also been quoted by Alan at the company roadshows.
PPRuNeUser0198 is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2009, 10:40
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,573
Received 88 Likes on 34 Posts
Qantas To The Middle East.Why Not?
Because that would involved expansion, something that only occurs in the Qantas Group in the form of a Star and an orange belly.
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2009, 11:39
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK/QF Codeshare

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Back in the 90's, when Ek first started MEL-SIN-DXB, they codeshared with QF. Unfortunately when it came to renew the agreement, there was a slight disagreement, and QF was rebuffed.
History since then speaks for itself.

Not quite ... EK approached QF to do a code-share, but QF basically laughed in their face, dismissing them as some small fry carrier from the sandpit. Look who is laughing now !!
HAMO is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2009, 11:42
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas will go to the Middle East only if they can continue on to London and these services are daily.
What sort of dinosaur thinking is that? Just a total head-in-the-sand attitude to the changing business environment they operate in!! God help us if this is the best that multi-million dollar salaries generates.
ferris is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2009, 06:05
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What sort of dinosaur thinking is it to only fly a route people want and to do it daily for convenience and efficiently?

More dinosaur to fly a route not many wish for, occasionally so even less use it?
Tankengine is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2009, 16:10
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More dinosaur to fly a route not many wish for,
Not many? EK alone are 3 times daily out of the major oz cities, and they are chockers. They then hub out of Dubai direct to anywhere you want to go- Paris, Istanbul, or even Tehran. That, is better than a daily flight to LHR, then on from there. The Dixon era was nothing more than stagnation. It was profitable for a few years while the company was basically dismantled, but it was being set up for the buy-out. Now where is Qf? Staring at an orange future, and ever-decreasing market share. It is almost a niche carrier already. I swear some people never see what is going on in the world beyond the SY domestic terminal. Anytime I read on this board what a great strategy Dixon employed, I'm incredulous.

Oz is at the 'end of the line". QF is not in a position to hub. At least it could carry the pax to the hub (and direct to the destinations it can reach from oz, of course {which appears to be the orange bit of the game}). It may have a future doing that. But sticking to the SY- LHR thinking? Can't see a big future in that.
ferris is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2009, 02:04
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My point exactly!
We are not a hub, therefore we need to fly people to where they wish to go!
That is not the ME!!! We hub in Singapore, rightly or wrongly! I agree we should go to more destinations in Europe but how many EK Australian and European customers actually want to go to the ME?
We have a large Lebanese community in Australia and should probably fly there, but perhaps not Dubai.
Tankengine is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2009, 05:51
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Eternal Beach
Posts: 1,086
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who says it will be QF hubbing through the Middle East?

On another thread Joyce is sprouting about Rome, Milan and Athens for Jetstar.

My money is on the later.

halas
halas is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.