Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar does it again!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 23:48
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Breakfastburrito

In relation to your post the other day, you are of course quite correct in pointing out the ‘dark underbelly’ in the fine print of the LCC model when things don’t go as planned. Spare aircraft capacity, accommodation, baggage gouging, inflexibility and the like are real issues facing passengers using a LCC.

I think it is reasonable to pay for the things that mitigate the ‘dark underbelly’ matters you point out so as to improve certainty of time and cost. But I question the value when today’s passengers payfor unfunded liabilities incurred in previous years.

For example, I understand that two of the largest liabilities (that need funding) of ‘full service’ airlines are the ‘pensions’ and unused frequent flyer points. Let me know if I am wrong about this.

Richard Branson is quoted on this subject in another thread “Will BA Go Bust?” (see below) – although we all are aware of Branson’s capacity for spinning a story.

In the same way that some LLCs gouge the uneducated passenger, I think some ‘full service’ airlines have been guilty of gouging the unquestioning customer. As mentioned in a previous post, I think we are seeing a fundamental paradigm shift in airline business models that makes formerly unquestioning customers ask some pertinent questions about value for money.

I may be wrong in choosing to travel based on price and perhaps I will come running back to the ‘full service’ airline when I get badly jilted – and I will post my experience on this site.

Cheers

Pedota

Richard Branson is quoted as saying Virgin had looked at a bid for BA, Branson said, but concluded that the company’s liabilities – in particular its pension deficit – were too great. “It’s not worth much anymore because of the liabilities. We were thinking about if the shares went under 100p (they closed on Friday at 136˝p), but it would be better to wait for its demise”.

Last edited by Pedota; 24th Jun 2009 at 01:11. Reason: in
Pedota is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 23:56
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or are we simply seeing the "Globalised Corporatisation" of the airline industry?
What will happen to pricing then, when all the smaller independent
operators are squeezed out by the merged industry juggernaugts?
blow.n.gasket is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.