Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

A history lesson in Australian Aviation for a certain reporter...

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

A history lesson in Australian Aviation for a certain reporter...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Mar 2009, 05:07
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,303
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Gidday Old Fella. Absolutely right that we can all learn from the misfortunes of QF1 at the 19th hole.

However I think the figure was closer to in excess of $100 mil (yikes!). But I will stand corrected.

Last edited by KRUSTY 34; 1st Apr 2009 at 20:28.
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2009, 22:55
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Downwind
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...not to mention 2 catalinas during the war, with a Lancastrian not long afterwards, all without trace, but we're digressing here....
Freewheel is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2009, 23:54
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
Was it United or Pan Am that managed to pop the left wing gear structure through the top of the wing on a 747-SP after a less-than-smooth landing on 16(L) in Sydney?
C441 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2009, 00:34
  #64 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Krusty, about $90mill if I recall.

c441, perhaps you mean 16R? Pan Am I think was long gone when 16L opened.
Keg is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2009, 06:22
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
C441, that was Pan AM & it happened on two occasions.

Keg, the figures have been available on many PPRuNe threads & yeah it cost US$96m to fix & the aircraft was insured for US$187m but that doesn't stop stop contributors to this forum from perpetuating the myth that it should have been written off but QF did not want to admit a jet hull loss.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2009, 06:29
  #66 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd like to thank QF for saving Mrs C's car. It was almost written off in an accident, some $20+ K for repairs to a $40+ K car.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2009, 11:31
  #67 (permalink)  
beaver_rotate
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Capt Claret
I'd like to thank QF for saving Mrs C's car
And by car Claret i'm guessing you mean VH-NXE?? woopppsss
 
Old 1st Apr 2009, 12:00
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Repair Cost

Krusty34 Of course you are closer to the figure, a typo on my part. Three of my family were on the flight and I was able to read the full report, which somehow was made available to one of them. It made very interesting reading, especially the CVR transcript and the DFDR info from TOD to finally stopping. Extremely fortunate that it did not end much worse, considering it went off the end at 88 Kts, compared to the Connie which went off at about 40 kts.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2009, 13:13
  #69 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

I was able to read the full report, which somehow was made available to one of them.
You mean perhaps from the report available from the ATSB web site?
Keg is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2009, 23:47
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Report

Keg. No, I mean a printed copy of substantial size which was provided to my aunt who was slightly injured in the event. I guess it was the same as the ATSB web report and it was several years ago.

Last edited by Old Fella; 2nd Apr 2009 at 00:02.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2009, 07:22
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NZ
Age: 72
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old Fella

Could post it here.(If possible)
Fark'n'ell is online now  
Old 2nd Apr 2009, 07:33
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATSB report

Fark'n'ell You can click on the link at Keg's post and it will take you to it. If that doesn't work for you PM and I'll give you the detailed link.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2009, 07:37
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tallong NSW
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see on his blog he has got stuck into Emirates again, and made reference to the difference between incidents and accidents and repeated his original claim.

Maybe more to the point, I haven't seen a word about this accident in the rest of the media for over a week. Like, it didn't happen.
denabol is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2009, 08:35
  #74 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by beaver_rotate
And by car Claret i'm guessing you mean VH-NXE?? woopppsss
Sorry to burst your bubble beaver but the car is an Astra convertible, seats 4 at a pinch, and the driver tried to fly it across some paddocks!

The connection between it and QF 1 is both cost about 50% of their value to repair. In Mrs C's case, no one has accused her of repairing it just to avoid a hull loss.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2009, 10:18
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
....less-than-smooth landing on 16(L) in Sydney?
Yeah, I meant 16R. It was in brackets because back then it was the only rwy 16!
C441 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 13:09
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,792
Received 115 Likes on 55 Posts
The Ansett B747 on it's first flight that dumped too much fuel and had to land on it's first approach
It didn't dump too much fuel and have to land. It failed to extend the nose gear, as the emergency hydraulic pump hadn't been turned on by the flight engineer, who also misinterpreted the gear display, failing to notice the nose gear hadn't extended. They landed despite a gear warning.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 15:42
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ansett B747 accident

Yes, the F/E failed to note that the NLG was not indicating down. No, he did not fail to turn on the "Emergency hydraulic pump", which in fact is the Air driven hydraulic pump, for No 1 hydraulic system. It was found to have less than full output, the reason for which was not determined. Under high demand conditions the ADP's will augment the EDP's. The NLG did not lower, due in part to the fact that the flap was running out right down to touchdown and the hydraulic systems could not cope with the demand of flap and gear simultaneously without all pumps operable. (No 1 engine driven pump was not available). The Captain elected to continue with the landing despite a landing gear warning horn and an unsafe indication. Worth noting that the F/O had not yet completed line training to the type and the F/E was on his first revenue flight on the B747.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 16:07
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Outback Queensland
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When the ATSB report eventually emerges and all you willy wavers have finished your mines bigger than yours bragadoccio I look forward to running the tape measure over your (potential accident loss of life which mighta coulda maybe but never happened) and comparing it's length with Sandilands (potential accident loss of life which mighta coulda maybe but never happened).
Diesel Fitter is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 10:43
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,303
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Christ Diesel Fitter, if your implication is that pilots should not have an opinion, then you obviously don't understand the nature of the beast. I thought the thread was going along nicely. Sure some Chinese whispers creep in, but that's almost inevitable.

Usually when someone accuses pilots of lining their "members" up, its more often than not by a person with zero or at least limited aeronautical experience. Say maybe an engineer who sees pilots as overpaid underworked primadonnas. Ironically that can sometimes be the case, but remember, this is a PROFESSIONAL PILOT'S forum, and among the collective experiences to be found here are opinions earned over many thousands of hours FLYING EXPERIENCE. Something that non professional pilots can sometimes fail to grasp.

If I am off the mark here, I humbly appologise in advance
KRUSTY 34 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.