Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Malaysian Airlines divert to Learmonth

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Malaysian Airlines divert to Learmonth

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Nov 2008, 11:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Malaysian Airlines divert to Learmonth

Geez Learmonth's been busy lately for the wrong reasons!!

Maybe this will give them the reasoning to get money from the scroungy government up upgrade facilities in Exmouth eg. hospital etc and the road between Learmonth and Exmouth, if theres a cyclone the roads fd, actually if theres any rain, the road is pretty much unuseable. So if there was an emergency you would have alot of people but no emergency services, then again that's WA for you!

Happened Thurs morning, a passenger was pretty ill so they diverted.

Edit: heres an article. Malaysian Airlines flight lands at Learmonth with sick passenger | The Australian
pilotdude09 is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2008, 11:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting. Not much detail in the article about what actually was the cause!
Aussie is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2008, 12:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't have a problem with improving infrastructure in outback area's, but the Gov won't pay for it, so who will. As a recognised International alternate, maybe the Gov should get a little pro-active
yowie is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2008, 19:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Here and there
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aussie.

For once the media reported it as it happened...

Sick passenger needed urgent medical attention and Learmonth was the closest alternate for an international flight.

Agree with the comments regarding funding for the area.
Was told third hand that they would have been better off continuing to Perth to save the 1 hour drive back to Exmouth in the back of the ambo. Of course our good friends at the RFDS were able to help out to avoid said drive.

Good outcome by the sound of it
Area QNH is... is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2008, 23:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Metung RSL or Collingwood Social Club on weekends!
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe this will give them the reasoning to get money from the scroungy government up upgrade facilities in Exmouth
Two medical diversions in over 30 years............you're joking!
Whiskery is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2008, 23:21
  #6 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two medical diversions in over 30 years............you're joking!
Has it been confirmed that there have only been 2 medical diversions in 30 years?
RedTBar is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 01:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Here There Yonder
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A little off topic, but I work for an airline that flys past Learmonth daily, ususally at night and because of the regulation we operate under, we are unable to use the the place. The reason being a) Out side controlled airspace/no Tower, b) no RFF.

Before you start asking " what is wrong with out side controlled air space", don't wate your breath. Most of the pilots thow up their hands when asked to make a visual approach. OCTA, no chance.

Many have asked if we can apply for a dispensation but they are not interested. Same applies for Kalgoorlie as an alternate for Perth - OCTA.

Too bad!
Ndicho Moja is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 02:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: oz (30% of the time)
Age: 62
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So Mojo, when you fly to Perth you carry ADL as the alternate for PER because the pilots in your outfit can't do a visual approach?

Has it been confirmed that there have only been 2 medical diversions in 30 years?
I reckon it would be more like 40 years. Although when the Yanks had their Naval Base there on the North West Cape there was probably a functional hospital then.
jack red is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 06:14
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Here There Yonder
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jack red, that is not what I said. However the regulations we fly under do not allow us to plan into uncontrolled airspace/airfields without controllers and require us to carry an alternate or its equivalent for every destination. OZ, if my research is correct, if the weather is better that alternate/special alternate minima then a destination alternate need not be nominated.

Last edited by Ndicho Moja; 16th Nov 2008 at 06:25.
Ndicho Moja is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 07:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: oz (30% of the time)
Age: 62
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry Mojo, you did state "most of the pilots" had no chance of making a visual approach OCTA !

Most of the pilots thow up their hands when asked to make a visual approach. OCTA, no chance.
jack red is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 07:11
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: aus
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Guys
The cause of the 777 diversion was a female passenger, was thought to be going in a insulin coma, the flight was on its way to Adelaide. There was doctor on board but not trained for type of emergency, but did a great job of helping the woman, also a doctor there to meet them.
RFDS plane diverted with doctor on board from near YPBO.The crew of the RFDS were given very little info on the woman, when arrived the woman was lot better but still ill.
RFDS then transported her to perth, I hope she will be ok.
How do I know all this, I was the sitting at the pointy end, it was good outcome by all.
air med is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 08:40
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: International
Age: 76
Posts: 1,394
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Do not foget the medical diversion to PHE by LH in a B747-400 a number of years ago
B772 is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 11:33
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: melbourne
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A British B744 dropped into AS in the wee small hours due med emerg, either early this year or late last year.

RPT's landing at 'other then intended destination' due medical is actually not that uncommon, though rarely into OCTA aerodromes.
man on the ground is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 12:16
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: aus
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have had a few 146's divert to YMEK due to a medical need, no-one hears about them as it wanst news until the qantas incident.
air med is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 16:11
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seem to recall SQ going into PHE a few years back as well, medical iirc??? End of it is though, if you've got to be on the ground, be on the ground wherever suits at the time
Little_Red_Hat is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 17:34
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 359
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A380-800 driver

Well we all know how high an A380-800 pilot sits. It must be a lot higher than I thought!
You must be on oxygen all day long looking down on us mere mortals struggling to keep right side up!

I also fly in that part of the world and do use the OCTA ports as alternates but that is the choice of my Flight Operations Department.
Their choice, their train set, their shoulders to bare the weight of their decisions.

Please if you want to start throwing rocks (competently or not) I suggest you prepare yourself for some interesting posts.

Get down off that high horse before you fall off!

ad-astra is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 01:26
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Here There Yonder
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know I said "a little off topic" but the responses to my post are turning out to be Way off topic.
What I meant was we are not allowed to plan into OCTA/no controller airspace/airfields. Many of the pilots I fly with only and have only ever flown within controlled airspace, under radar and ILS to ILS. So, visual approaches are very rare and so having to try to cope with OCTA procedures is a non-starter.
Can it be done? Of course. Can it be done well? Perhaps. Are they the procedures of choice? No!

Enough said. I am sorry I mentioned it.
Ndicho Moja is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 03:47
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ML
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, there's no doubt this was related to the Qantas incident - they both had two engines.
flypy is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2008, 07:55
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,101
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by jack red
Sorry Mojo, you did state "most of the pilots" had no chance of making a visual approach OCTA !
Jack, punctuation is important. He said "most of the pilots throw up their hands at a visual approach." Note the full stop ending the sentence.

"OCTA, no chance." That'd be a new sentence.

So he's saying the guys are uncomfortable doing something as straight forward as a visual approach so there is no chance of getting them to fly OCTA where they're even more removed from the ILS to ILS system they're used to.
AerocatS2A is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.