Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QF 767 Narita

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Aug 2008, 14:10
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: hongkong
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
beyond belief

yes..it's totally beyond belief that an aussie operator would calculate takeoff data for one runway and mistakenly use another...747's don't do it in taipei either!..or 340's in anchorage..or 777's in bangkok...etc etc
BlunderBus is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 23:18
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Roguesville, cloud cuckooland
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
The two runways in NRT are separated by a couple of kilometres, they are not side by side and have diametrically opposed taxi routes. You cannot mistake one for the other. You cannot taxi for one and mistakenly end up on another. Departures on each runway are strictly controlled by a slot system, of which ATC are very aware.

For a crew to take off on the wrong runway there, ATC also would have to have screwed up mightily.

It didn't happen. Its a beat up. Build a bridge...
Capt Kremin is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2008, 11:29
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: M.I.A.
Posts: 210
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Lightbulb

A series of slices of Swiss cheese lined up on the night. Incorrect thrust was set. SOPs subsequently changed.

And no, it wasn't me.
Bug Smasher Smasher is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2008, 01:00
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes blueloo and Bug Smasher Smasher, you seem to be the only people on this forum who know the truth.

The last thing I would ever do in this business is criticise anyone for making an error, regardless of the possible consequences. It can happen to anyone at any time. The most important thing is to identify the deficiency that caused the error. In this case the crew self-reported, and a procedural flaw was identified and corrected. There was no retribution.

Open reporting at its best. Nice to see the system works.

"Take-off Data Checked"

OI

Last edited by Ochre Insider; 10th Aug 2008 at 04:05.
Ochre Insider is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2008, 02:01
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,292
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
"Take-off Data Checked"

But has it? And therein lies the problem of Challenge and Response.
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2008, 04:07
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Capt Fathom

It is not a checklist item, but rather a procedural item on lineup. It is a statement by the PNF that is confirmed by the PF.

OI
Ochre Insider is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2008, 08:15
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: australia
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Paint this tail red!

Take Off at Canberra. Taken from the tower. (use sound)

http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photoga...-Australia.wmv

Last edited by bush pelican; 10th Aug 2008 at 08:36.
bush pelican is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.