Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Merged: Qf cancels/delays flights out of Perth

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Merged: Qf cancels/delays flights out of Perth

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Feb 2008, 09:09
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Golden Road to Samarkand
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The insanity of traffic sometimes leads me to think I was insane to transfer....
I hear that West Radar does that to people...
Quokka is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2008, 09:14
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: in denial
Posts: 293
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
westausatc.... Yes, they are a lot of fun to fly. 13mins to FL390 without even trying. The A330 is nowhere near as much fun!
Veruka Salt is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2008, 09:15
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: airside
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737 good, 767 better, but give me a 744 any day!
max autobrakes is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2008, 22:09
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas problems in Perth again

http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/stor...1-2761,00.html

Surely they could have applied for a curfew exemption.

747 Classic again????
Comoman is offline  
Old 29th Feb 2008, 00:20
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dubai
Age: 44
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quokka,

fortunately, doing doggos and weekends now so experiencing some of the quieter shifts - ahhh! the bliss! Not so much nuttiness!

Veruka,

Have a mate who flies the 76 - loves the aircraft. Not so enamored with GD and the crew but loves the aircraft.

Max,

Why the 744? 'Coz it's a bigger sh@g pad?
westausatc is offline  
Old 29th Feb 2008, 11:18
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Golden Road to Samarkand
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...enjoy the break, and you're right about needing to get into those A330 at taxi, or sometime soon after... never could get TMA to pass a requirement though. The grief came when an aircraft told you on first contact that it could meet the requirement, then entered the 100KT-plus jet-stream and couldn't meet the requirement.
Quokka is offline  
Old 29th Feb 2008, 11:53
  #47 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Talking

737 good, 767 better, but give me a 744 any day!
Obviously talking about the performance of the bank account rather than the performance of the aeroplane!

I can't wait to get hold of a 'modern' flight deck on something with the grunt of the 787. All the 'niceties' of the 744 with the 'joy' of the 767. Bliss!
Keg is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 01:27
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dubai
Age: 44
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keg,

Is the 787 going to have the performance of a 767? Surely in this day and age of 'environmental consciousness' those sort of things get thrown out the door? Don't get me wrong - would love it to be able to climb like the 76 but just not sure Boeing will sacrifice improved fuel consumption for it.
westausatc is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 02:44
  #49 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs up

It's a two holer westie so logic suggests that its going to have some get up and go- at least in the lower levels- in order to cater for the engine out case. Heaps of grunt to cater for this means heaps of grunt available for the remainder of the climb

I just hope they don't go the way of the A330 which when heavy is supposedly a slug almost as bad as the 744 when approaching top of climb. I'm not sure why this is- de-rated thrust management in the climb?- but I'll be broken hearted if Boeing do go down this alley.

Of course, full rating climb on the 744 burns less fuel than rating one but does result in higher EGT and thus 'harder' (figuratively speaking) on the engines. Therefore if we're concerned about saving fuel than getting to altitude more quickly is the way to go!
Keg is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.