Lower, er higher, or is that lower?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Suitcase
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lower, er higher, or is that lower?
From the QF website :
B787 - Other benefits include:
Or am I just being pedantic...
B787 - Other benefits include:
- Increased window size and a "lower cabin altitude pressure" that reduces the effects of jetlag.
Or am I just being pedantic...
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Devonport Tasmania Australia
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wynsock
Its seems fairly clear to me, but what the hell would I know.
Lower cabin altitude to me would refer to the in-cabin pressure to be equivalent to say 7000 feet rather than 10000 feet so more comfortable for the punters.
Higher cabin pressure = lower simulated altitude.
Please advise me if I have been chasing too many parked cars peoples.
Best regards
EWL
Its seems fairly clear to me, but what the hell would I know.
Lower cabin altitude to me would refer to the in-cabin pressure to be equivalent to say 7000 feet rather than 10000 feet so more comfortable for the punters.
Higher cabin pressure = lower simulated altitude.
Please advise me if I have been chasing too many parked cars peoples.
Best regards
EWL
Last edited by Eastwest Loco; 16th Jan 2008 at 08:16.
I'm in one of those moods
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SFC to A085
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EWL .. as always, spot on of course 
.
... as for chasing parked cars
.
... not possible, they are all parked in the airport car park down here in LT
.
.
.. hat ....... coat ........ door
.
... as for chasing parked cars
.
... not possible, they are all parked in the airport car park down here in LT
.
.
.. hat ....... coat ........ door
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wynsock, correct weight !
..............where did they come up with that nonsense?.........anything less than 14.7 PSI (pressure at G/L) means some sort of neg effect on humans. So in saying that the cabin ALT press being lower is better?......sheeeeeeeeez give me a break !
We`all know that you would need around 9PSI +(diff between the cabin press & the ambient outside air pressure) to maintain a S/L cabin at say 35000 ft. Anything less than this for Eg. means a higher actual cabin meaning less ability to transfer the oxygen to the blood stream & ultimately a lower sat rate (saturation rate). Obviously it's more about press rather than quantity of O2.
Besides pressures above 9 PSi for Eg would result in greater fatigue for the airframe. I believe the B787 uses elect motors/compressors to increase the press rather than robbing it from the engines alone.
Might just be in the wording anyway
CW
..............where did they come up with that nonsense?.........anything less than 14.7 PSI (pressure at G/L) means some sort of neg effect on humans. So in saying that the cabin ALT press being lower is better?......sheeeeeeeeez give me a break ! We`all know that you would need around 9PSI +(diff between the cabin press & the ambient outside air pressure) to maintain a S/L cabin at say 35000 ft. Anything less than this for Eg. means a higher actual cabin meaning less ability to transfer the oxygen to the blood stream & ultimately a lower sat rate (saturation rate). Obviously it's more about press rather than quantity of O2. Besides pressures above 9 PSi for Eg would result in greater fatigue for the airframe. I believe the B787 uses elect motors/compressors to increase the press rather than robbing it from the engines alone.
Might just be in the wording anyway
CW
I believe the B787 uses elect motors/compressors to increase the press rather than robbing it from the engines alone.
Seriously though, I always thought the the bad bit for your health was the reduced amount of bleed air reducing air quality.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi 'oz'.......it's not so much quality of air that matters, well might be if there was a leaking No 3 bearing which in one of the A/C I fly would result in smoke in the cabin it's more about the actual pressure of the air we breath. Reducing bleed air means reducing pressure such as in a failed pack, that's the enermy
Sounding like ML trams???...if I heard anything like a ML tram whilst airborne I'd think we would be finished !
Wikipedia has an excellent explaination of pressurized flight
CW
Sounding like ML trams???...if I heard anything like a ML tram whilst airborne I'd think we would be finished !
Wikipedia has an excellent explaination of pressurized flight
CW
I think it had more to do with the airconditioning than cab pressure. Higher recirculation ratio uses less bleed air to run. I think I have that the right way round. Anyway the rub of it is recycling more stale air in the cab equals poorer air quality which in efffect would also equal a higher perceived cabin altitude.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: australia
Age: 44
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the enemy
YOU are the enemy you di****ad. You got the other site closed (eba), but you won't get this one closed.
It's getting closer to the IA date and this time your handlers can't pretend they didn't know, or is that didn't care?
Give it your best shot. We know who you are now. By the way...what did they promise you? Hope you got it in writing, because you will know the value of a verbal contract.. don't you?
It's getting closer to the IA date and this time your handlers can't pretend they didn't know, or is that didn't care?
Give it your best shot. We know who you are now. By the way...what did they promise you? Hope you got it in writing, because you will know the value of a verbal contract.. don't you?
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey "amos" I too am at a loss as to what 'grouter' is on about, I hope the word 'enermy' didn't touch a nerve ! probably the wrong choice of words there I think. I meant the 'enermy' being the insidious nature of hypoxia caused by lack of O2. Yr right there also Ozbus the ratio will have an effect on air quality. How long can you hold yr breath?
Maybe QF will let the pax have less air, that way they achieve two things for free ! One being the pax will be sleepy/doppy & require less food/assistance & the other being the engines might get better fuel economy, cheap buggers !
CW
probably the wrong choice of words there I think. I meant the 'enermy' being the insidious nature of hypoxia caused by lack of O2. Yr right there also Ozbus the ratio will have an effect on air quality. How long can you hold yr breath?Maybe QF will let the pax have less air, that way they achieve two things for free ! One being the pax will be sleepy/doppy
& require less food/assistance & the other being the engines might get better fuel economy, cheap buggers !CW
