Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qlink-457 visas for Dash8-400 drivers

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qlink-457 visas for Dash8-400 drivers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jan 2008, 01:43
  #21 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
QF Accidents

No one- including the current generation of QF pilots- denies that QF has pranged aircraft and (shock horror) killed passengers at various stages in our history. Super Connies, Flying Boats, Rapides in PNG, QF1 @ BKK, etc.
Keg is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 03:34
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: DN
Age: 64
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keg
Why not read the posts before getting your guard up.
The AIPA can talk-the-talk; in the end thats all that it has been from the Executive, for years. Dixon hasn't been around for years.
To prove its true support then lets see the idea put to the vote to the members, before QF management.
Unite all the troops.
Just an idea.

Would you like to predict a result of either possibility?
Crewroom talk is one thing and a ballot is another.
Kev9 is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 04:12
  #23 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs down

OK, let's re-read your comments.

Because it isn't that the QF management won't allow career progression for the Regional drivers. it's the Mainline drivers that wont allow it.
Its simple.
Present tense used by you. Present situation is that Geoff Dixon is anti GOL and has written to the pilots stating that it won't happen. Present situation is that AIPA is trying to get a GOL implemented. Therefore you are wrong and either ignorant or are running an agenda.

There may be some truth to your comments as to why it hasn't happened in the past but I wouldn't agree that it's because AIPA has actively worked against it. Some AIPA COMs in the past have flirted with the idea but to be frank, management have never sought it.....if they did offer progression then there is nothing that AIPA or any other line pilot could do about it as we don't control who is employed.

A QF747 Captain has scant regard or even any empathy with a Regional pilot.
Nor do they want them amongst their rank.
I ly with 744 Captains quite frequently and apart from a few dills (that none of us tend to want to fly with anyway), there is nothing but admiration for the job that the regionals do flogging around the outback doing non precision approaches all day.

I could be wrong...
You are.

Wanna go again?
Keg is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 04:27
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: DN
Age: 64
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keg
Nope won't go again.


'Quote'
'I ly with 744 Captains quite frequently and apart from a few dills (that none of us tend to want to fly with anyway), there is nothing but admiration for the job that the regionals do flogging around the outback doing non precision approaches all day.'


When patronizing comments start, I'm walking.
No comments from me about 'Sky God' attitudes, nope, not from me.

ps I hope that all see sense and instigate career progression through the group.

I'm out
Kev9 is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 06:23
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only thing stopping qantaslink pilots progression to mainline is GD and thats a fact, the current AIPA management is working very hard to unite the pilot group despite the ignorance of previous AIPA leaders. I also understand the current CP and other high management types are in favor of career progression, it is amazing that qantaslink pilots have a better career progression to virgin than to there own company.
newsensation is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 06:35
  #26 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs down

It's always interesting watching someone play the victim card time and again...particularly when they've been shown up as being a dill for their previous comments. If you want to continue being a dill Kev then just keep typing although personally I just admit when I'm wrong!

I have nothing but professional admiration (as do the vast majority of the rest of my colleagues) for what the regional guys do day in, day out. If you want to interpret that admiration as patronising or condescending then there is absolutely nothing I can do except to say 'have a nice life'. Enjoy being a victim.

Funny though that despite the face that you're ignorant as to what the current QF drivers are trying to achieve that we are both talking about the same thing.
Keg is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 07:02
  #27 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm a tad surprised that Howard has gone along for the ride.
I agree rather a harsh and hasty post by me, I will edit it somewhat!

I still stand by my comment however that there is a certain amount of 'turf protecting' going on, even if by your own admission they are in the minority. Do these people by chance hold senior positions within the company? Within AIPA?

Perhaps this is where this perception (valid/or not) comes from?
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 07:39
  #28 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
G'day Howard, within AIPA? Possibly but the overwhelming majority of the COM is very pro GOL. Certainly I've not spoken to any COM member that is against the proposal.

QF management? I dunno....I haven't chatted to anyone in management about this issue in the last couple of years- I just read what Geoff Dixon writes to me about! I hope that even they may be starting to see the benefits of offering progression to our regional folk.
Keg is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 08:04
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: uranus
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sign Language

Howard and Keg,

Your agenda for the GOL and AIPA may gain more momentum if you would ask the domestic mainline drivers to stop giving us the "bird" as they taxi past our shinny jets painted in silver undercoat. I cant feel the love.

You will have to excuse me, I'm having a blonde moment, but I just can't work out how a QF driver, mainline or Long Haul would gain anything from a GOL. Are they REALLY that keen to come and fly a bus and the last bloke I told I was a Dash driver, didn't even know that we operated such a superb aircraft.

Last edited by CAPTBOB; 14th Jan 2008 at 08:11. Reason: Afterthought
CAPTBOB is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 08:21
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Living next door to Alan
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Keg,

I remember a few years ago Dixon stated quite clearly that career progression would happen "over his dead body" and that if put in that position he would sell the regionals off.

The question you have to ask is this: Is it better to pig-headedly stick to this fatally flawed ethos and see the very people you need go to your opposition in unprecedented (and uncontrolled numbers), or do you accept the fact that you must offer them a career path, and take control of the rate these guy's progress out of one part of your company into another? (And keep them in the QF Group?)

The QF group NEEDS experienced crew throughout its operations. All businesses have a shortfall in one way or another. Regardless of which side of the fence you sit, the fact of the matter is that whoever has all the pilots wins. Currently Qantas is deliberately overlooking a critical means of stopping attrition.

The other problem they will be facing from February is the imminent onslaught into much of the Qantaslink market by Virgin Blue. Ironically, a lot of the E-Jet crews will be recently departed highly experienced QantasLink pilots! How will QantasLink respond? How can QantasLink respond?

Why did/are they leaving? Many for less (initially) wages!

There are quite a few Captains who do not wish to leave, but see no alternative. Lifestyle died with the last EBA but all the companies these Captains are applying to offer at least 2 more days off per month. The only other way of boosting your lifestyle is via a Mainline position.

Therefore, if the company is unable to offer much needed lifestyle improvements and a career path within the QF Group to their key regional staff, these staff will take the easier option and progress themselves outside the group. Then the group loses out. Both Qantas and QantasLink.

I used the following analogy to one of my managers recently: With the current crew shortages if I were in a position of influence I would be like a rabid dog trying to viciously protect my staff from going to the opposition. I would take all necessary steps to get them to want to stay - not want to leave.......If that means career progression and lifestyle improvements, then so be it. A small price to pay for keeping the opposition's hands off my experienced staff and making it harder for them to crew their aeroplanes!

At the moment more still want to leave. Kind of says it all

If I were a shareholder I'd be spewing at the thought of losing revenue through a lack of crew. I'd be livid if I knew these same crew were going to the opposition purely because of one person's pig-headedness!

Last edited by Hugh Jarse; 14th Jan 2008 at 08:53.
Hugh Jarse is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 08:27
  #31 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Fer christ's sake Jarse, stop talking so much sense.

You keep talking like that an' you'll never make a manager. You mark my words!
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 08:37
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Living next door to Alan
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danger

Hullo Clarrie!

I banged my head against a brick wall with the last post.

Guess what?

All I did was hurt my head. Ops normal

I would never be a good aviation manager, because I believe my staff are my key asset. That would get me sacked in the blink of an eye. Or at least no KPI bonus. The aforementioned philosophy of looking after your staff seems to be a successful cornerstone in every industry except aviation.

Hope the family is well mate.

Last edited by Hugh Jarse; 14th Jan 2008 at 16:29.
Hugh Jarse is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 08:38
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: #37 for Start
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snoop QantasLink to Qantas Career Progression

IMHO all is Not Lost...

I recently (days ago), received a Document from someone at Qantas Group:
[email protected]

And I qoute:
Progression to Qantas*
* Qualifying period of 2-years applies before progression to Qantas is available, some conditions apply
Q4NVS is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 08:39
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Suitcase
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the tone of the middle managers at Qlink, I get the impression they want us to leave.
  • The roster/lifestyle has gone to ****e,
  • the first "bonus" was an outstanding, insulting disaster,
  • some wise bean counter had the great idea of charging new hires; and
  • tired pilots have had much needed annual leave cancelled because of the staff shortages.
but hey, "there is no pilot shortage"

WynSock is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 08:56
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Q4NVS

IMHO all is Not Lost...

I recently (days ago), received a Document from someone at Qantas Group:
[email protected]

And I qoute:

Quote:
Progression to Qantas*
* Qualifying period of 2-years applies before progression to Qantas is available, some conditions apply
This has been available since April/May 2007 and those 'conditions' involve all testing again (psych/skills then sim and interview). The only difference between this and DE employment is that some concessions are made in one area of the applicants choice which bias' the overall application on the competitive scale. On top of this, FT-9 scores from all cyclics are taken into consideration which, in a sense, makes it harder than DE employment.

This isn't the progression the guys in Qlink are looking for. True progression involves none of the above - just years of service and then straight to a ground school.
Dragun is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 10:09
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If Darth wrote a letter saying the would be no GOL, did he state why?

Why does he not want to see regional pilots progress? Anyone know?
DeafStar is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 10:29
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 2hot
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
original Link

DEC on Q400 .. I may come home for that & no visa Reqd ! lifestyle not $$
but feel it will never be on offer

As for Hugh Jarse - as you where one of the Good Guys in my time I must say surprised you have not jumped ship by now.. maybe progression to Jetstar for EAA/Sunnies...

As for those bent out of shape like DirectAny and Max Autobrake... get over IT.. Kev and I simply expressing what we encountered when employed as a Regional pilot over many years with Kd and QF Link, generalisation Yes so appologies to the Good Mainline driver's..
armslides&crossdress is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 20:38
  #38 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
CAPTBOB, I flew the 767 around the domestic network for eight years and gave the regional guys and gals a lot of over that time frame but I never saw anyone flip the bird! I'm disappointed that is the case.

I do recall a funny time once when we passed in front of a DJ aircraft and the skipper said 'watch this' and flipped the bird at the crew. Of course the DJ driver got into the spirit of things and flipped it straight back. The difference was that we were facing his nose as we went past and so all the two crew were the only people to see our bird. We of course were side on and so the DJ skipper flipped the bird to everyone down the left hand side of our aircraft!

Hugh, I'm with you brother. It's insanity pure and simple.
Keg is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2008, 00:14
  #39 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: south of the boarder
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Armslides...........If bypass pay is not offered to all who meet the requirements, good luck getting any f/o to crew with you. Lots of sick leave and not a healthy crew room i should think
missing link is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2008, 05:39
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: #37 for Start
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what are the minimum requirements for a Q400 Captain then..?
Q4NVS is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.