Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

JQ EBA to sell out new hires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jan 2008, 10:55
  #161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queenland, Australia
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey MAX ,better make it to Coogee Bay Hotel or thereabouts this coming Saturday, it's the last one before the yes or no week.

Last edited by aulglarse; 20th Jan 2008 at 12:09.
aulglarse is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2008, 22:21
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CHC
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Guys and Gals, Im currently with pacific blue have interview with both VB and J* whats the general feeling as in better airline to work for is it true the new hires will only be on 70 odd K for first year with J*? Any Info would be great thanks.
time4change is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 00:34
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Casablanca
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3 pages later and the "experts" are still insulting Jetstar pilots - from their training to their operational standards to their moral integrity.

Yet STILL no-one seems to know what terms and conditions are actually contained in the EBA.

What a bunch of rocket-surgeons!

P.S - Did anybody really believe that WADD story? Really? Oh, for shame......
flyingins is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 00:55
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 2hot
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh Dear

Well after reading the thread in hope of learning about the TOPIC , I think I will reconsider wanting to go back to Oz for a position with J'star / Qf group, was more than happy to change seats/lower pay but if one has to listen to this crap Top of climb to the green ring forget it...
Really .....
armslides&crossdress is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 02:32
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Extreme
Posts: 315
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keg wrote:
(If you don't know what I'm talking about with respect to planks and specks and so on then you need to go back to your basic year 5 Scripture teaching and Bible study.)
permFO wrote:
Keg- The reference you are looking for is Lk 6:41-42 and The Message gives a contemporary feel to it.
As a professional pilot I find the direct references to religion on a professional pilot’s forum offensive. I’m sure you can contribute without such references, if you can’t, then don’t, move on and find a religious based pilot forum, I am sure that they are out there.
Shot Nancy is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 03:36
  #166 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Question

Interesting. It's always an insight discovering who is 'offended' by a Christian reference....particularly when the reference is as innocuous as this one.

Shot Nancy, are you also offended by people posting 'There but for the grace of God go I' when referenced to aircraft accidents and incidents that they see could have occurred to them? I've seen that posted numerous times. What about when you read 'reap what you sow'? Are you offended by that one? That too is a biblical reference (Galatians 6:7 if you want to look it up. )Both of those are direct references to religion but I don't recall you ever voicing your objection or that it offended you!

So why this one and why now and in what possible way could it be considered offensive to provide some context to the examples I used?
Keg is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 03:56
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmmm.....am with you on this Keg....I had to read his and your posts 3 times to work out how you could have offended him! Still no idea.

And by the way.....we work in a profession where lives are at risk daily....to NOT acknowledge the Creator's role in life is initself a religous statement. As pilots more than most we should be conscious of "Higher" things. Personally I have no idea how planes fly for example and I've been sitting in them big and small for 40 years! So as you say....... "There But For the Grace of God" is not an unknown phrase in my little lexicon.

If I was to look at the scriptures and see parallels....I'd be looking at the labourers in the vineyard who were arguing whether they were worthy of their hire. That would be about Matthew 20 and well repays a good think, from both sides of the QF fence.
Captain Sherm is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 04:00
  #168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: DSS-46 (Canberra Region)
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Good Lord!

That was so untenably incredulous, I could almost hardly believe it!

What was this topic about, again?

TID
Tidbinbilla is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.