Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Service Circus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Dec 2007, 06:19
  #41 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs down

Sarcasm and satire is obviously lost on some. If you're after my thoughts on the merits of B scales then a search of my posts- particularly on the recent C/C LH EBA thread- may be useful.
Keg is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2007, 06:41
  #42 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Mate thats the first example I have seen of sarcasm and satire used like that.

About the only people that will be keen to sign on to those conditions will be the younglings looking to see the world. We can only hope!
RedTBar is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2007, 21:58
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hiding..... in one hemisphere or another
Posts: 1,067
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Frankly, I couldn't be bothered with Qantas anymore and have stopped flying with them. If I want to fly anywhere within AUS, I fly myself. Once a year when I travel overseas to the UK for business, then Emirates first class (at LESS THAN half the price of Qantas business class!!) is the only way to go.

I neither care for, nor am even the slightest bit interested in whatever internal issues Qantas has. I don't like what they offer me for MY money, so I go elsewhere, in fact I'm fecked if I know why I wasted 5 mins of my day typing this
Atlas Shrugged is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2007, 22:11
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately executive management appear to have no leadership skills. This reflects upon the extremely low morale amongst staff (and subsequently costs the company potentially higher earnings. And higher executive bonus's?????......)
Dropt McGutz is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2007, 22:19
  #45 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
then Emirates first class (at LESS THAN half the price of Qantas business class!!) is the only way to go.
Atlas Shrugged.....When I saw your post I thought you beauty I'll go Emirates next time but when I checked their respective web sites it didn't add up...

First on Emirates to LHR was around $17,000
First on QF to LHR was around $16000

Business on Emirates to LHr was around $8000
Business on QF to LHR was around $12000

These figures are return...

So Business is a huge advantage for Emirates but first class on Emirates is no where near half the QF business class.

...Or do you have another way like buying a round the world ticket to get the difference?
lowerlobe is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2007, 22:24
  #46 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dropt McGutz is right as you should not blame the staff for any short comings.

The blame sits squarely on the shoulders of management because their attitude filters down to employee's although I understand what people say when they don't want to spend their money on QF.
lowerlobe is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2007, 23:16
  #47 (permalink)  
Kiwi PPRuNer
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: rockingham, western australia
Age: 42
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im not usually one to complain, but on a recent (august) syd-chc flight
i have decided to fly business class as a bit of a treat to myself,
breakfast comes round, i chose museli i think it was, the csm (or whatever its called these days) walks straight past with the milk after serving the bloke next to me,
now im not one for the govenment owning everything, but i think its time kev stepped up to the plate, brought back qantas and commenced a sweep of all the deadwood (start from the top) get it back to the good old days
where it was a pleasure to fly
ZK-NSJ is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2007, 23:49
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hiding..... in one hemisphere or another
Posts: 1,067
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Or do you have another way like buying a round the world ticket to get the difference?
Don't have the papers with me at the mo but when I flew SSY-LHR in Feb this year QF business was, I think, $12,236 and EM first was $6,490 or somtehing like, that through a travel agent in Sydney. I'll have root around and see if I can find the exact details
Atlas Shrugged is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 00:21
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qf recently spent a lot of money replacing all the economy trays, cups etc.
The money should of been spent on fixing the IFE. Not one pax so far has made any comment about the new trays, but people that have no IFE for 12hrs + get pretty peeved off and believe me, have plenty to say.

Another well thought out idea from management.
left 4 primary is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 01:00
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new crockery was chosen to save weight ie. less fuel burn.
Dropt McGutz is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 01:15
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: all over the shop
Posts: 986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's an idea to save weight/fuel burn - remove the IFE altogether if it never works! Would save a whooole lot more than changing the crockery around
sinala1 is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 01:23
  #52 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This may sound like a novel idea but how about buying a ife system that works in the first place.
and if you want to save money don't give a bonus to someone when things they authorised don't work.
They are only our customers so if they can't work out how to keep them happy turn it into a freight airline.
That would save a packet because we would not need pax services,CC management,ff schemes and lounges for a start.
RedTBar is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 06:29
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ozmate
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No...............I know.......................let's change the shape of the Kangaroo......................oh........................and change the font of the lettering .....................that should waste a few millions that could be better spent elswhere !!!
woftam is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 07:27
  #54 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that should waste a few millions that could be better spent elswhere !!!
.......Yep,Darth's next Bonus.....
lowerlobe is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 22:27
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I have been told by a number of people, the ife QF chose, was not the one recommended by the staff that were doing the selection process. It ended up being selected by Marketing.
rammel is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 22:47
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 49
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
Rammel that notion is seconded! It was indeed chosen by marketing even after the selection staff recommended an alternative! (ie it was cheaper!)
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 00:03
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The other cheaper alternative they went for was Airbus over Boeing.
twiggs is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 00:28
  #58 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

Rammel, incorrect. I have spoken at some length to one of the engineers who was on the selection committee for the much maligned IFE. Although now retired he goes to my church and is in my parents Bible study group.

I joked with him that he was the one to blame for me spending long amounts of time on SATCOM discussing with the maintenance watch how to solve the myriad of problems. He acknowledged that indeed he was part of the process and that the company took the recommendation from the committee on which he was a part. That the successful tenderer didn't deliver wasn't foreseeable at the time and he felt that any committee today faced with the information that they had at the time would probably make the same decision. He acknowledged that hindsight is a wonderful thing.

This shouldn't be confused with the process that went towards buying the A330. My understanding is that the recommendation from both Flight Ops and engineering was to not go with the A330. However they were just two voices at the table and the aircraft selection 'committee' (not sure of their precise make up or whether they Flight Ops and Engineering have a vote at the table or just provide 'information') decided to go with the A330.
Keg is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 00:51
  #59 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The other cheaper alternative they went for was Airbus over Boeing.
However they were just two voices at the table and the aircraft selection 'committee' (not sure of their precise make up or whether they Flight Ops and Engineering have a vote at the table or just provide 'information') decided to go with the A330.
Did your section have anything to do with that twiggs?

It's hard to imagine that the old 'cartridge' film system gave fewer problems that the much vaunted IFE system installed......At least most of the flights in those days were shorter....
lowerlobe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.