Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

737' At Ywol

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jun 2007, 06:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Age: 46
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737' At Ywol

Under the airports current configuration, could 737's run out of Wollongong?
Bizz

Last edited by bizzybody; 3rd Jun 2007 at 06:16.
bizzybody is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2007, 06:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't be great, but yes I think it would work depending......
ozmahseer is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2007, 09:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Left Seat, Up Front
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737 at YWOL

I was just there today. The main runway "feels" long enough at 1800m.

In looking up the website for some details of the airport, the pavement limit is 22.5 Tonnes. Which would probably rule out a 737 regardless of length ... but a 737 is a bit bigger than anything I have every flown.
FlugWeasel is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2007, 11:53
  #4 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

1800m would be plenty for SYD-MEL and possibly even something like SYD-ADL. I've never flown the 737 so not 100% sure.

The real question is one of demand for an RPT service- unless one of you guys is thinking of chartering a 737 for the day!
Keg is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2007, 14:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Runway length is just the start. At Wollongong, the hills are real close and it is quite probable that the 737 would be severely restricted because of the obstacles.
Centaurus is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2007, 22:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess the more sensible question is could it take E170s or E190s
apacau is online now  
Old 4th Jun 2007, 00:28
  #7 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I suspect neither the 73 nor the Embraear will be able to operate out of WOL, well not on runway 16 anyway. To use the full length of 16 you require 4.98% climb gradient!

Supplementary take off distances, reduce operating length to 1637M at 3.33% and down to 1393M at 2.5%, technically you could probably do it, but you wouldn't be carrying much...
Howard Hughes is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.