Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

cruise/junior first officer 4 J*

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

cruise/junior first officer 4 J*

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Mar 2007, 03:20
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Age: 54
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF hasn't recruited in years and when they finally so it will still be 8+ years + for an SO to become and FO.
Alot of people on these forums are thinking this way. I can tell you with a great deal of confidence thats is a very incorrect figure. Provided there aren't anymore significant setbacks, you can halve that figure.
podbreak is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2007, 03:34
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: previous russian ports
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
P2T2, you have sprayed a lot of sh88 here, and whilst it makes interesting reading, can someone please explain the following:

Given that according to the learned comments on this forum, we are in the grip of a world wide pilot shortage, and given that apparently, every other airline in the world is paying so much better;

Why is it that from all accounts (friends I have in J*) very few JQ pilots have left for these greener pastures?

Additionally, as far as I am aware, everyone gets paid overnight allowances and having seen several JQ domestic captain group certificates average salary appears to be around AUD155K (including O/T and not O/N allow.) which would, all things being equal equate to approx. $172K 'ish for a JQI captain.

Still have not come across one guy who has his days off upline either.

Will have to wait unitl end of 06-07 financial year to assess JQI group certificaes, but this seems to be the way it is panning out.
topgun0007 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2007, 03:35
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The MNL allowance is about 2000 pesos per day which on today's exchange rate, 38.6 PhP to the AuD, is $53 AuD."

"Last time I was there, year or so now, this was not enough to eat in the hotel. Basic breakfast was 15, lunch about 25 and dinner about 35 so no go."

The irony being that your daily expenses, which apparently are not acceptable to you, constitute the monthly income of most people living in the Philippines.

Such is life.
oicur12 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2007, 06:13
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 298
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

podbreak - there are a stack of guys who are well and truly more than half way to the 8 year mark, with absolutely no sign of an FO slot in sight. As an example, the last 767 FO slots (all 3 of them for the whole training year!) went to guys who are around the high 1600's in seniority - meaning they joined in 2000.

However, as a means to ease the pain whilst waiting for an FO slot, earning solid $$$ as a S/O goes a long way I guess... while it lasts
Johhny Utah is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2007, 10:57
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Age: 54
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JU, I'm aware that the current status of limited movement has resulted in this, but I was referring to future employees. I take it that is what the poster had in mind. With the new aircraft on the way, there is likely to be substantial movement, similar to that seen 99-01. People are free to deny this until they are red in the face, but if I were a young SO right now or a future employee, I wouldn't be too concerned.
podbreak is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2007, 11:17
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
Johnny

You sure those blokes you are referring to aren't cadets. There are FO's on the 767 who joined a long time after 2000, however they joined with several thousand total mostly command.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2007, 11:41
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: centre of my universe
Posts: 309
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
but if I were a young SO right now or a future employee, I wouldn't be too concerned.
Poddy I would be worried about being on a different contract to the current CA. A real possibility for any future new hires.
Poto is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2007, 12:10
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 298
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

To clarify - the 767 slots I mentioned are only the very latest ones, however the last several years have been of similar seniority. You would have to go back to late 2002 to find guys who managed to get the last of the 'early' promotions onto the 767 - roughly 12 months as an S/O before becoming an F/O on the 767.

As for a ground swell of promotion as new aircraft are delivered - I'll believe it when I see it. Don't get me wrong - I will be happy should it eventuate, but I certainly won't be holding my breath...
Johhny Utah is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2007, 20:32
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SE Aus
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Neville,

You sure those blokes you are referring to aren't cadets. There are FO's on the 767 who joined a long time after 2000, however they joined with several thousand total mostly command.
Is there something I am missing in the certified agreement which allows guys with decent experience to circumvent the seniority system? Perhaps a poorly advertised Direct Entry FO Scheme? Not sure if you are making a point re : opportunity, motivation or neither...

VI

Last edited by Victor India; 4th Mar 2007 at 20:44.
Victor India is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2007, 21:20
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: centre of my universe
Posts: 309
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Maybe Nev was talking about the requirement for 3000 hrs (I think?) before a QF driver, from the cadet program, can move into a window seat

Someone with a little more knowledge of the requirements can enlighten us all

Wonder what the Crz F/o requirements will be?
Poto is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2007, 21:47
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SE Aus
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Poto,

Thanks - that seems to ring a bell but I haven't got the books at the moment so can't confirm.

Cheers!
Victor India is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2007, 00:05
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to start a thread drift, but just a question out of curiosity more than anything, does anyone know what the ruling is in regards to cadets being "promoted" to Jetstar as F/O's should they desire after being S/O's? I know the whole thing about having to resign from big brother and all but given cadets dont have all that much command time would Jetstar accept them as F/O's as QF do in time? I assume it's possible but of course not sure why you would be that keen anyhow....
pastadolla is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2007, 00:24
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: They seek him here, they seek him there
Posts: 141
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF Cadet to Jetstar F/O

When the Jetstar F/O vacancies were advertised by FSO I recall thinking the command experience requirements were well in excess of what any cadet would have unless they did quite a lot of private flying.

I am not familiar with the specifics of the Industry Placement Programme but I don't think there is any command time in that for cadets.
GaryGnu is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2007, 00:38
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: in denial
Posts: 293
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was a 767 F/O for 5 yrs, and in the latest training allocations I would have been about 1 yr too junior for a 767 F/O slot . . . .

. . . . unreal.
Veruka Salt is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2007, 06:08
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When the Jetstar F/O vacancies were advertised by FSO I recall thinking the command experience requirements were well in excess of what any cadet would have unless they did quite a lot of private flying.
Correct, there were current QF A330 F/O's who didn't meet the requirements for a J* F/O.

There were current QF Captains who didn't meet the requirements for J* Captain, despite having a command at QF for a decade or so. Even many A330 QF check and training Captains did not meet the requirements.

The requirements were a complete joke and designed to ensure no QF (well except maybe ex AN 320) would meet them.
murgatroid is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2007, 06:21
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lacemba!
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think with the current state of affairs at QF a promotion is best found in the desert. While the goons fiddle with our careers we best make our services more usefull elsewhere. See you guys and gals at the EK road show.
excellr8 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2007, 07:54
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Podbreak,

Genuine question - how do you figure on all this promotion?

A380's and A330's coming but Classics and 767's going.

738's coming but 734's going.

Replacement aircraft means a lot of training but this is not the same as promotion, CM seems to be very careful when he talks about this, he always talks about the massive 'training' coming up not 'promotion'.

Extra aircraft are needed for promotion and whilst there will be some extra aircraft, hardly large enough to completley reverse the current timelines.
speeeedy is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2007, 09:14
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The Future
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True Speeedy, that is also assuming that mainline guys will be flying the new equipment. Geoff has guys paying for their own endorsements on 330s and no doubt 787s when they come, he has a wet lease crewing company in the form of AO, who are already undercutting mainline on mainline routes, who do you think he would prefer fly the new equipment?

Remember he said "The new equipment will go where it is best utilised and most profitable?" Do you honestly think that will be mainline?
Elroy Jettson is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2007, 09:47
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 396
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What will happen when JQ get the 787?

Who pays for the endorsement?

Is it covered in their current agreement?
Wingspar is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2007, 10:17
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: airside
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guess what?
The International variation to the JetStar Collective Agreement the JetStar pilots voted for, was for a "widebody variation".
That means they could quite conceivably end up flying the A380 for peanuts as well as the B787!
HEBES SUM ET SUFFRAGIA FERO!
max autobrakes is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.