Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas Outsourcing = The Indian Employment Company

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Outsourcing = The Indian Employment Company

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Nov 2006, 07:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Saint Malo France
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 3 Posts
Qantas Outsourcing = The Indian Employment Company

Indian company signs $70m deal with Qantas

India's software giant Satyam announced it has signed a $70.9 million technology outsourcing contract with Qantas Airways.
Satyam, India's fourth largest software exporter, said under the seven-year pact it would maintain information technology services and develop software for more than 150 applications for Qantas.
"This partnership calls for Satyam to further enhance Qantas operational efficiency," said Virender Aggarwal, senior vice-president of Satyam.
More than 1,000 software professional associates were employed at its unit, Satyam Australia, to supply software development to global companies including nine of the top Fortune 500 firms, he said.
About 100,000 graduates and professionals are employed in the outsourcing and technical support industries in India as global firms take advantage of the country's skilled but relatively cheap English-speaking manpower.
But a shortage of skilled manpower poses an increasing problem and there is concern about mounting wage costs in a fiercely competitive recruiting battle.
- AFP

cheers
dijon moutard
dijon moutard is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2006, 10:04
  #2 (permalink)  
BHMvictim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
....looks like we will be getting a most amazing offer on mobile phone plans with every tech support call
 
Old 9th Nov 2006, 10:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
And just wait until Qantas want to retender for their IT needs five years into the seven year contract...................Oh of course the managers who made the decision will have collected their bonuses and left by then.

Management is about maximising the long term value of the company.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2006, 01:24
  #4 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Outsourcing in reverse.

The New Zealand Herald Nov.10,2006

Air NZ engineers win US$3m contract from UK airline

12:30pm Friday November 10, 2006


Air New Zealand's engineering services division has won a US$3 million ($4.6m) contract for the installation of a new inflight entertainment system and heavy maintenance checks on nine Boeing 767-300 aircraft.

The contract was awarded by British airline Thomsonfly, which has a fleet of 47 aircraft, carrying more than eight million passengers a year.

The work will be carried out at the Air NZ's engineering services division's Auckland facility until May in preparation for Thomsonfly's summer schedule.

The first of the Boeing 767s was to arrive at the Auckland base tomorrow, Air NZ said today.

Heavy maintenance checks will be carried out on seven of the aircraft being sent to Auckland, while the latest Panasonic eFX Audio Visual on Demand inflight entertainment system will be installed on five aircraft.
HotDog is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2006, 07:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: earth
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
are they not having trouble finding staff to do this.
Apophis is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2006, 08:50
  #6 (permalink)  
BHMvictim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Apophis
are they not having trouble finding staff to do this.
Of course not..... it's NZ. They will have no problem finding employees willing to work for peanuts.... undercutting their neighbours.
 
Old 10th Nov 2006, 09:13
  #7 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pity their neighbours were not enterprising enough to grab the business.
HotDog is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2006, 09:51
  #8 (permalink)  
BHMvictim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Actually hotdog, us "neighbours" just want fair pay for a fair days work. Why should we sacrafice our standard of living whilst that of our CEO and his evil helpers just keeps getting better and better. We refuse to bend over as our Eastern neighbours have.

If history is anything to go by, I am sure you will have some smart ar$e response as to why we should all take pay cuts and accept worse conditions. .
 
Old 10th Nov 2006, 14:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NZ
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lets talk about Ansett. Australia sucks.
turbolager is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2006, 18:42
  #10 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats a good question turbolager and who was managing Ansett when it went under..MMMMM oh yeah it was the Kiwis
lowerlobe is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2006, 23:39
  #11 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BHM, what makes you so sure that ANZ engineers are working for peanuts? They have retained their jobs and their productivity.

If history is anything to go by, I am sure you will have some smart ar$e response as to why we should all take pay cuts and accept worse conditions.
Take an Alprax and have a lie down. No need to send money, I bulk bill.
HotDog is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2006, 06:13
  #12 (permalink)  
BHMvictim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
http://www.smh.com.au/news/business/...829595538.html

With specific reference to the following:-

ENGINEERING workers will present Air New Zealand's management with a business proposal tomorrow in a last-ditch effort to stop the airline outsourcing most of its heavy maintenance - and hundreds of jobs - to Asia or Europe.

and....

It is understood the proposal will include the scaling back of overtime pay and time off in lieu.

and so us Qantas engineers have to put up with this from our overpaid CEO....

Qantas has already warned it could be forced to follow Air NZ's lead if it could reduce costs across its Australian maintenance operations.

So as CEOs continually increase their obscene renumeration packages year in year out, whilst those that keep the planes flying are expected to accept less and less, do we put up a fight or do we just cop it, as seen in the example above?

How about our executive management lead by example and make their positions more comptetive? (And I mean apples for apples here. If they wish to compare engineering with that of facilities based in 3rd world countries, then so too should the comparison of their positions be made).

Outsource to the cheapest bidder, maximise your renumeration. Dixons rule.
 
Old 11th Nov 2006, 07:06
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney , Australia
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BHMvictim

Outsource to the cheapest bidder, maximise your renumeration. Dixons rule.

gee BHMvictim , that above quote is true in everyday life not just dixons. it happens everywhere in every business. even you would do it buying everyday products. ( umm which product is cheaper and is the same quality)

so unfortunately you better get use to it becuase this is only the beginning and they call it globalization

also with the Air NZ engineers since they might be losing certian conditions what are they getting in return..let me guess overtime banking , umm doesnt Qantas Brisbane have that implemented?
satmstr is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2006, 07:46
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: QRH
Posts: 546
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by satmstr
umm which product is cheaper and is the same quality

I don't think quality comes into it these days. If it did, outsourced jobs would still be here in Oz. Ring a support centre in India then one in Australia and tell me which one is "better quality". You couldn't possibly tell me that other countries who can perform maintenance (for example) cheaper than in Oz will match or better the standards of our engineering skills, long considered the world's best?

Globalisation is a load of crap. It is a nice catchword for the "take it or leave it" decline in working conditions offered to us "or else we'll shift yer job overseas" in order to boost short-term management bonuses that is affecting not just aviation. If you look ahead into the future (vision seems to be lacking these days, as also noticed by Sunfish) it is not unrealistic to see that your average Aussie will be struggling to pay for the goods and services offered by these companies - the imbalance between rich and poor will be wider than ever with virtually no middle class Australia. This may be worst-case, but it is still possible, even probable.

Getting back to aviation, whatever happened to those posters I used to see on walls, you know the ones:
  • Safety
  • Comfort
  • Schedule
  • Cost
Or were they just used to cover the rot which most of us seem to be happy with now?
Led Zep is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2006, 10:14
  #15 (permalink)  
BHMvictim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by satmstr
( umm which product is cheaper and is the same quality)
there-in lies the flaw in this argument. Outsourcing is cheaper, however the quality is certainly NOT the same.

Current check in BHM, fairly new, (8yrs old), 767-300. Last heavy maintenance done in Singapore. There are a significant number of defects which are directly related to poor quality of wokmanship performed during the outsourced HM check.

Cheaper, but certainly NOT of equal quality.
 
Old 11th Nov 2006, 11:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Top of Descent
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An oldie but a goodie

Post from Turbolager ..."lets talk about Ansett. Australia sucks."

That might be the first half score but at the full time siren it was Australia sucks and New Zealand Nil....
Shlonghaul is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2006, 11:08
  #17 (permalink)  
BHMvictim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Shlonghaul
 
Old 11th Nov 2006, 22:23
  #18 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BHMvictim, perhaps you should have highlighted the date of the SMH article, which was Dec. 7, 2005.
HotDog is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2006, 05:25
  #19 (permalink)  
BHMvictim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
And your point is what Hotdog?

The article shows that ANZ employees would rather cave in than fight for a fair go. Infact, not only do they cave in, they MADE the proposal to cut pay and conditions, rather than accepting it as a proposal from the company!!

The date is irrelevant.
 
Old 12th Nov 2006, 09:14
  #20 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hot Dog,

I think the point is that by downgrading their own pay and conditions in NZ they are effectively lowering the conditions for those doing the same job in the near vicinity and that means Australia.The date at which they do this is irrelevant .
lowerlobe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.