VB and Skywest interviewing again!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Outback Oz
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
VB and Skywest interviewing again!
VB and Skywest are interviewing again!
Great news for all.
Interested to hear about the experience levels of candiates and the profile of the new VB Simride.
Good luck to all.
Cheers.
Great news for all.
Interested to hear about the experience levels of candiates and the profile of the new VB Simride.
Good luck to all.
Cheers.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: onthadek
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would be intersted to know about experience requirements aswell. Particularly if VB will persist down the 500 multi command route or place more emphasis on time in a multi crew environment.
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Age: 54
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It’s a must have if you want to get a command one day.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in them thar hills
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ferrett it is because it is their train set. And they just may have worked out that the equipment they operate requires a certain amount of prior experience to make the training go a bit easier.
Could you please explain to me why you need 500 hours multi engine command to secure a command on high capacity aircraft
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CAO 82 only has the multi command requirement for operators with a LOW capacity AOC. Operators with a high capacity AOC are NOT bound by any regulatory 500 multi in command requirement, and any such stipulations are purely a creation of the company.
Most in GA, and a couple of posters in this thread, mistakenly believe the 500 multi in command applies for all operators and is bypassed by Qantas (for cadets etc) by virtue of an exemption. This is NOT the case. For a high capacity AOC, all you need is a valid ATPL. And the command hour requirements for an ATPL are a total of 250 hours (can be single engine) of which 150 can be ICUS. So in fact all you need is 100 hours in command!
To support the above, you will notice that Jetstar no longer have a mandatory 500 multi in command requirement. They have put an "and/or" criteria which allows them to capture experienced FO's that don't necessarily have multi command experience.
In saying all of this, I can testify to its accuracy only as far as 2001. It may have changed, but I'm not aware that it has.
I suggest a couple of the posters do a little more research in the CAO's re low capacity v high capacity AOC rather than shoot from the hip.
MB.
Most in GA, and a couple of posters in this thread, mistakenly believe the 500 multi in command applies for all operators and is bypassed by Qantas (for cadets etc) by virtue of an exemption. This is NOT the case. For a high capacity AOC, all you need is a valid ATPL. And the command hour requirements for an ATPL are a total of 250 hours (can be single engine) of which 150 can be ICUS. So in fact all you need is 100 hours in command!
To support the above, you will notice that Jetstar no longer have a mandatory 500 multi in command requirement. They have put an "and/or" criteria which allows them to capture experienced FO's that don't necessarily have multi command experience.
In saying all of this, I can testify to its accuracy only as far as 2001. It may have changed, but I'm not aware that it has.
I suggest a couple of the posters do a little more research in the CAO's re low capacity v high capacity AOC rather than shoot from the hip.
MB.
Hey Limpy
