Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Merimbula-Man leaps from plane set for take off

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Merimbula-Man leaps from plane set for take off

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th May 2006, 05:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Sydney
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Merimbula-Man leaps from plane set for take off

Just saw this on the SMH web site.

Somewhat interesting i think.

A man opened the door of a plane and jumped out as it prepared for take-off at a South Coast airport this morning.

The 33-year-old man, who is believed to be American, jumped out while the Regional Express plane's engines were running at Merimbula Airport.

The plane, which was stationary, had been readying for a flight to Melbourne about 11am.

The SAAB 340's doors had been closed and locked for take-off when the man sprang from his seat and demanded to be let off, police said.

A crew member was believed to have told the man he was unable to get off, but he then opened the plane's door and jumped out, police said.

"The man jumped out of plane and onto the tarmac,'' a police spokeswoman said.

"The pilot, seeing the man on the ground, instigated emergency procedures to shut the engine down.

"The airport staff held the man until police and ambulance arrived.

"The man, believed to be an American citizen, was taken to Pambula hospital for assessment.

"No crew members or passengers were harmed and there was no damage to the plane.''

Police believe someone from the plane restrained the man after he ran onto the tarmac.

The man was in custody pending further investigations, police said.

An ambulance was called to Merimbula airport about 11am, but the man had not been injured and no treatment was required, a spokesman said.

Comment was being sought from Regional Express.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/...335852028.html
Roger Roger is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 05:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too bad he didn't do it after take off!!

Then we Aussies could have given him a right royal send off as we have taken to doing lately!!
Milt is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 06:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: WSSS, YSSY
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i wonder which door he used..... the entry to board the Saab 340 is next to the prop lucky for him it wasn't moving or he'd been mince meat
Triple 7 is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 06:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Ponderosa
Age: 52
Posts: 845
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
probably one of those 'jackass' stunts, look forward to seeing it in the next movie .
hoss is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 06:38
  #5 (permalink)  
Ralph the Bong
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Very interesting post.

It makes me wonder what's happening in the Australian industry these days when I hear stories like this. It would be instructive to know which crew member said that the passenger was 'unable to get off'. Was it flight or cabin crew? What information and training are those in regional GA given these days? Bizarre...

The only correct response in a senario like this is that the aeroplane returns to the terminal and the passenger and his bags are let off. You simply wear the delay and get on with it. Why take a problem into the air?

Mate the possible legal consequenses that the crew and company could now face do not bear contemplation.
 
Old 4th May 2006, 08:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S/E Australia
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

He obviously thought the service stank!
RYAN TCAD is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 10:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PRESS RELEASE FROM REX

http://www.rex.com.au/corp_info/ShowNews.aspx?nid=70
HAMO is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 10:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: syd
Age: 56
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bong or Bong Head, whatever you call yourself!

I think you need to get the facts before throwing any stones my friend.!!!

After speaking with the crew personally after the incident, the fact was that the person involved lept from his seat after the Cpt had started the left engine, pushed the FA out of the way and opened the door himself!!!

For you to say that the training the REX pilots receive for an incident like this could have led to this situation is quite ignorant.

I know for a fact that the company would never encourage or allow the crew to T/O with a passenger who is clearly distressed.

I'm sure there is more to come!!!!!
G Cantstandya is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 12:06
  #9 (permalink)  
Ralph the Bong
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Geyecarloscastenenda, "The facts are??" ... What??

Funny how what you cite the crew as saying differs markedly from what was quoted in the newspaper. I note that the SMH say the Police claim that the man demended to be let off the aircraft. It is also alleged that he was told that he could not get off. That the man opened the door himself is not in question! What is in question is if he expressed a wish to be let off and if this request was denied.

Interestingly, witnesses are being sought in this incident (according to the SMH) and I would have more faith in their account than in what the crew have to say.

If a pax asks to be taken off a flight the crew is compelled to oblige. Failing to do so is a criminal offence.

Even heard of kidnapping? How about false inprisonment? Assault? These are the offences that a crew would face if a passenger is taken for a "ride" against their will.
 
Old 4th May 2006, 13:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: QRH
Posts: 546
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Ralph the Bong
If a pax asks to be taken off a flight the crew is compelled to oblige. Failing to do so is a criminal offence.

Even heard of kidnapping? How about false inprisonment? Assault? These are the offences that a crew would face if a passenger is taken for a "ride" against their will.
Are you able to cite reference?
Led Zep is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 14:05
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Someone's been inhaling their pseudonym
5miles is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 14:23
  #12 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It depends on your point of view - the aircraft was off stand but on the ground. To a passenger that means the flight hasn't begun yet but to the crew it pretty much has. Maybe part of the safety brief should include details of the relevant Air legislation for the operator's country specifying the legal requirement for the crew to operate the aircraft safely and for the passengers to co-operate accordingly so we don't get this "KIDNAPPING!" stuff every time some nutbar tries to "escape".
MarkD is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 14:32
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
part of the safety brief should include details of the relevant Air legislation for the operator's country
Maybe not the safety brief but I as part of the crew would sure like to know WHAT the rules are relating to this. I think Bong's got a point, regardless of what he's smoking.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 22:25
  #14 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,500
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
He almost did a Jack Newton did he?
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 23:59
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Usually its the other way round, with late pax arriving with the plane on the tarmac demanding to get on as it hasnt left yet, even with the props spinning.

Happened to Emu at KGC 12 months ago as well as Kendell in Port Lincoln.

Amazing considering that the "security fences" are all in place at these ports.

Still isn't the first nor will it be the last methinks
Deejay 1 is offline  
Old 5th May 2006, 00:34
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: syd
Age: 56
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bong Boy
Do you really believe everything you read in the SMH?
You do yourself no justice!!
G Cantstandya is offline  
Old 5th May 2006, 07:58
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Duty of Care?

Left engine, right engine, who knows which engine was started first. Rex says the right, G Cantstandya says the left, SMH says both. I'd have to say it'b hard to trust the SMH to get the story 100% correct.

The crew may be compelled to oblige letting someone off the aircraft and maybe they were going to but they also have a duty of care to keep passengers safe including the guy wanting to exit. If both engines were running, which sound like they wern't, he could have been mince meat.

Sounds like the guy was in too much of a hurry to get off and interpretation could have been confused with, you can't get off right now! Only the crew knows exactly what happened? So I think duty of care over all passengers rather than kidnapping would be legally acceptable. Maybe?
Utradar is offline  
Old 6th May 2006, 00:06
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe that ralph seems to be batting for another team, his misguided belief that rex is "regional GA " can only be attributed to his ignorance of who rex are and that is a capable and professional airline.I can only from expeirence testify to rex's crew level of professionalism and training.To make broad generalisations of the incident, especially being based on "the medias" account ,is foolhardy at its best.ME thinks that a mentally unstable person is far from reason, even if they are mentally stable but have a deep seated fear their actions when motivated by said fear can see their actions become irrational and or dangerous to themselves and people around them.I have also personally seen this when travelling as a passenger when someone became irrational during flight and believe me that person was far from being able to reason clearly. Again the crew's responsibility's are directly linked to the distressed passenger AND the other passengers safety who could also enter harms way due to said passengers actions.

Last edited by flyby; 6th May 2006 at 00:21.
flyby is offline  
Old 6th May 2006, 00:37
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bong Boy
Do you really believe everything you read in the SMH?
You do yourself no justice!!
You beat me to it G Cantstandya
If it was in the SMH it must be right.
NOT
assymetric is offline  
Old 6th May 2006, 03:37
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: At home
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Roger Roger
The SAAB 340's doors had been closed and locked for take-off when the man sprang from his seat and demanded to be let off, police said.
]
There must have been a QANTAS hostie filling in on REX for the day....
Over and gout is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.