Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

717 needs a new donk and other shenanigans!

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

717 needs a new donk and other shenanigans!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st May 2006, 22:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
717 needs a new donk and other shenanigans!

My my Nat Jet are having some dramas with the 717 lately. 1 in Cairns (NXB) needs a new donk, RR and Boeing tests to come, and the old (IMD) I think its now (NXI) is missing one engine in perth and basically is being 'rebuilt', 1 option is it should be ditched off fremantle its in that good of shape. Which F*&^%N idiot at Qantas made the decision to send Nat Jet the oldest (except for 2) 717s but yet there are 4 of the newest jets in Brisbane sitting there doing nothing? And don't even mention the spare parts issues, 8 days for an engine replacement apparently! In perth the old 146 (in national jet colours) have been forced to do qantaslink flights as flights have simply been cancelled thanks to the reliability of our new toy.
boeingwest is offline  
Old 1st May 2006, 22:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
I would like to respectfully suggest that there are a zillion possible reasons why this decision was made, not all of which would be stupid ones made by a "F*&^%N idiot". Availability of rotable spares, internal configuration and maintenance schedules come immediately to mind.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006, 06:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could that be the old JQ 717 IMD that was kept in Sydney as a spare aircraft??

I know of a few times that JQ had downgraded A320 flights to the 717 because of a 320 going U/S. Only to have IMD go U/S after a return sector.

airbusthreetwenty is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006, 07:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
I think its now (NXI) is missing one engine in perth and basically is being 'rebuilt', 1 option is it should be ditched off fremantle its in that good of shape.
That'd be the one that has been flying around happily for over two weeks would it (apart from a breakdown caused by a dud bit from another aircraft)?

there are 4 of the newest jets in Brisbane sitting there doing nothing?
Why don't you ask the owners of the aeroplanes? There are probably good reasons why they were not given to NJS, it's just you don't know what they are.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006, 08:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with Boeingwest our B717 operation is fast becoming a debacle and giving NJS a really bad name . Even the 146 was more reliable !!!!!!! with all the BHP work coming up for grabs it could not hapen at a worse time. fingers crossed we can get this sorted quick time
wallabyblue is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006, 08:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OZ.
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Boeing should have stayed with good old JT8Ds.
planemad2 is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006, 09:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: oz
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mustv been doing 1 engine ferries Bloggs

Boeing, I reckon the %$#@# idiot is at NJs and said something like " yeh, we'll take the oldest, cheapest to lease ones, thats our specialty "

Still, the competition in the West must be rubbing their hands together
cunninglinguist is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006, 12:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oz
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And in today's news NXB after some time being trouble shot in PER with a technical issue was ferried to CNS for further trouble shooting when alas was decided to be ferried back to PER only to land in Alice for a Tech crew change and hasn't left since. On advice from some most unhappy engineers in Alice the aircraft was moved well out of the way due to the possibility of it being there for quite some time.
OffBlocks is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006, 13:03
  #9 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
planemad

Those MD-80s in Japan didn't have such great JT8Ds as I recall. Maybe Boeing should have put V2500s on the 717s as with the MD-90 but I guess RR/BMW really wanted to sell some BR700s and offered a very good deal.
MarkD is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006, 14:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: QRH
Posts: 546
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Why not RR Tays?
Makes an F100 sound a lot bigger than it is. Guess they must've gotten a good deal with RR/BMW for those 715s as you say MarkD.

Any surplus Ansett Speys kicking about? BOOOOOOOM.
Led Zep is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006, 15:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Devil

When Boeing selected the BR715 powerplant for the B717, all the industry "experts" raved about how good the BR700 series engines were:- in particular "state of the art" tecnology in the hot section, advanced fuel management and very low specific fuel consumption.

From the comments expressed in this thread, i guess that the industry "experts" didn't know what they were talking about.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006, 16:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
GB,

I wouldn't count the above as "experts" on said donk. This is a bullsh1t network, after all. And the 715 sure as hell doesn't konk out in rain like the 737 hairdryers have been known to, the both of them at the same time, on more than one occasion.

The only problem with the 715 is they didn't put an afterburner on it!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006, 16:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: See you, NT
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeingwest, age of an aeroplane has nothing to do with dispatch reliability.

There are still DC-3's in service.

Maybe something more to do with the rotables etc that Sunfish talks about being in Newcastle.

Take out your atlas of Australia. Find Perth WA. Place five red dots there. Draw several dashed lines to places north such as NWN, PHE, KTA. Find Cairns QLD. Place one red dot there. Draw a line across the country to Perth going over ASP and AYE. Find Darwin NT. Place two red dots there. Draw one line down to ASP connecting it to the one ASP-PER, and add another line DRW-GOV-CNS.

Then take an orange pen and draw five squares around Newcastle, representing the $50 million in spares and rotables that Jetstar held there to support 14 seven-seventeens. Fill in one square with your blue texta, representing the $10 million in spares and rotables that Qantas has said is plenty for NatJet to support 8 seven-seventeens.

Finally sit back and look at your colourful diagram. Note the location and size of the spares inventory with relation to the NatJet seven-seventeen routes and engineering bases.

Bloody hell, not even the Lada dealer and service network looked like that!!
Kransky is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006, 20:14
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Living next door to Alan
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

The only problem with the 715 is they didn't put an afterburner on it!

Yeah Bloggs, but "Smoke On.....GO!!" Looks spectacular, and fitted standard. Those canny Germans.
Hugh Jarse is offline  
Old 3rd May 2006, 01:11
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's true that the 717 doesn't like sitting on the ground for days on end, they do come back from a rest being a bit cranky. Once you start putting the hours on them they go very well from an engineering viewpoint. Having a licence on the 717 and the Quadrapuff I know what I'd work on anytime. You're never bored when a 146 is on the ground and that was pretty often. I think the oldest 717 was VQB or VQC. One was a test a/c for McD. If NJS has insufficent spares to support the a/c that's their problem. I think some Newcastle people are over in ADL helping with some checks at present. That may help improve relations with NJS after they tried to stitch up a Newy LAME just after they got them.
Mobi LAME is offline  
Old 3rd May 2006, 02:54
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
Mobi LAME

If NJS has insufficent spares to support the a/c that's their problem.
Its not THEIR problem its QF's problem.
their aircraft their spares and their passengers being inconvenienced and their money paying for it
That may help improve relations with NJS after they tried to stitch up a Newy LAME just after they got them.
Not the story i heard but who do you believe?

Last edited by RENURPP; 3rd May 2006 at 04:24.
RENURPP is offline  
Old 3rd May 2006, 07:45
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OZ.
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MarkD
planemad
Those MD-80s in Japan didn't have such great JT8Ds as I recall. Maybe Boeing should have put V2500s on the 717s as with the MD-90 but I guess RR/BMW really wanted to sell some BR700s and offered a very good deal.
Don't know about Japan, the ones in OZ were okay.
planemad2 is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 01:21
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: australia
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
717

717 = DC 9 with a hot cam & 20 thou off the head right

The engine change time record for the DC 9 (JT8D- 7A) was 2 hours including run up (chock to chock).

Given enough QEC's..........where's the problem ?
shocka is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 03:44
  #19 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
took me a while to find this:

20 JAN 2004 JAS grounds 12 jets with engine cracks
Japan Air System (JAS) found engine cracks on twelve out of the sixteen MD-81/87 planes checked thus far. In total, 13 Pratt & Whitney JT8D-217 engines out of 29 checked had cracks, JAS said. Three planes that were found with one faulty engine, and thus subject to grounding anyway, did not have the other engine checked in the interests of saving time. (AFP)
MarkD is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 04:13
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: oz
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Renurrp,
from what the boys tell me it would seem that QF don't give a flying F%$# about the pax or the operation for that matter, a conspiracy theorist would almost go as far as to say that QF want to see it fail

f all spares, engineers, pilots, etc.
cunninglinguist is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.