Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Standards @ VB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jun 2004, 01:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: melbourne vic.aus
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Standards @ VB

I have heard on the vine that not is all well at VB-(From a standards point of view). Crews flying up to a Flight level above t
hat allowed in the FMC because the flight plan had them there . The plan was worked the day before on prelim figures. The actural wts far different from the planned.The result has been a No. of cases of A/C stalling and in 1 case I heard lost some 8000 ft .Before recovering.
A safety auditor appointed (EX Ansset) heared tearing his hair out .
I only mention this because by the time it gets to me its been around for weeks
whatitsdoingnow is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2004, 02:38
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Down under land
Posts: 307
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sounds like BS to me!

As if the guys in the sharp end would blindly follow the plan, ignoring the CDU message and allow the acft to fly into the "zipper". In any case the AFS & Stall protection wouldn't allow a stall to occur.

Sounds like someones having a lend of ya whatsitdoin

Watchdog is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2004, 05:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UAE
Age: 55
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And when they were asked to reduce to min speed by ATC, they did as instructed .... then asked to turn 90 degrees off track, they did as instructed .... however the min speed they had selected was less than that prescribed by Mr Boeing, with that horrible heart starting, newspaper dropping, coffee spilling stick shaker annoying them for the next 6000' before they regained composure .... and that's a fact!
Macrohard is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2004, 06:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oz
Posts: 311
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Can't vouch for the validity of Macrohard's story, but if it's true, then between that and their recent maintenance history, perhaps it is time that the regulatory authorities got a bit more actively involved with the great VB. I seem to recall another (more Australian) airline being grounded for less.

It's a shame that Bob Katter wasn't onboard - I wonder how a near stall with consequent height loss would have compared to the "Go-Around" experience for him.
esreverlluf is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2004, 08:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 0
Received 247 Likes on 107 Posts
6000' feet height loss...8000' height losss....wow....

I find it very hard to believe that an RPT jet aircraft operating mostly in A & C airspace could lose anywhere near that much "height" and not be reported in either the ATSB website or more likely, very surprised passengers (and FAs) spouting off to any reporter that would listen. Which is most of them. What about the ATCO who saw it happen on his/her screen or took the call if they were outside radar coverage? Don't you think they might spill the beans?

Sounds like yet another attempt to 'prove' that the only pilots that should be flying RPT jet aircraft in Australia are QF pilots.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2004, 10:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good training standards use to separate Australian airlines from some "other carriers" but not any more. I expect there will be more where that came from.
Chilli Muscle is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2004, 10:58
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UAE
Age: 55
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Believe it or not, however, it is now a SOP that the HDG SEL be set to 10 degrees when reaching cruise level to avoid any further embarrassment. Don't know how that satisfies the requirement of a rate one/25 AoB turn requirement?
Macrohard is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2004, 12:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And when they were asked to reduce to min speed by ATC, they did as instructed .... then asked to turn 90 degrees off track, they did as instructed ....

If that's the facts, then certainly they were under radar coverage and there would have been at least one witness watching the big eye in the sky.

5miles is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2004, 01:58
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne Aus
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And here's me being told by a 20 year old Qantas Second Officer the meaning and difference between Optimum and Maximum flight levels as prescribed by the FMC.

Perhaps VB dont teach their pilots accordingly?
Sounds like crisis management rather than good training.
Beer Can Dreaming is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2004, 04:29
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 0
Received 247 Likes on 107 Posts
Microhard
Don't know how that satisfies the requirement of a rate one/25 AoB turn requirement?
Are you talking about the maximum permitted AOB/ROT as per the AIP or some company SOP?
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2004, 04:35
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dunnunda & Godzone
Age: 74
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, to elicit certain reactions.

Caveat Emptor!

Woomera
Woomera is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2004, 06:07
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would not be the first time that a B737-800 has stalled at altitude. Agree with 5miles that it would have been on the radar tape, the departure from altitude ringing bells. Appropriate paperwork would have been entered...

Can someone tell me about blue star - the new recruitment methodology at VB??
rescue 1 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2004, 06:51
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UAE
Age: 55
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Skyway, so why was the procedure introduced to set the angle of bank selector to 10 degrees at top of climb ?? Just because they thought it was a good idea?
Macrohard is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2004, 07:36
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MINIMUM SPEEDS
The amber bar on the PFD speed tape, identifies the minimum speed that provides a 1.3g buffet margin. This margin of safety is easily eroded if the aircraft climbs, carries out a turn, or experiences turbulence.
The FMC includes a real-time bank limited function which is designed to help preclude LNAV commanded bank angle from exceeding the current available thrust limit. This bank angle protection is not available when LNAV mode is deactivated.

When manoeuvring at high altitudes with LNAV de-activated, flight crew should:
1. Fly at least 10kt above the lower amber band if sufficient speed margin to the upper band is available.
2. If speed drops below the amber band limit, immediately increase speed by carrying out one of the following:
(a) Reduce angle of bank,
(b) Increase thrust (up to Max Continuous Thrust - MCT), as required, or,
(c) Descend.
3. Limit bank angle to no more than 10 degrees for manual steering in cruise. The MCP bank angle selector should be set to 10 degrees from TOC to TOD to preclude higher bank angles during cruise manoeuvring in HDG SEL mode.

I hope this answers your question.
Level Change 340kt is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2004, 09:11
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

...and Level Change 340 obviously knows what he's talking about, unlike the rest of you turkeys who smack of PPL status, perhaps even SPL status?

I mean, what is this? Bag airline pilots because you haven't made it yet?

Never, ever, forget, there are only two types of pilots.

Airline pilots and those who want to be Airline pilots!!!

amos2 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2004, 10:01
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Macrohard

I seem to recall it's the same on the 744? Boeing SOP to go to 10 degrees bank angle selection at TOC in case of HDG SEL manoeuvering. Been off it for a while so may be wrong?

Cls
cheklapsap is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2004, 10:31
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UAE
Age: 55
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LVL CHG 340, Reading between the lines, Boeing FCTM for NG states a limitation of Vref40+100kt for holding above FL250. This is to provide adequate manouvre margin during the turns in the holding pattern. This speed is often above the amber bar+10kt on the speed tape. There is nothing stopping a crew from operating at a lower speed, ie. ALT HOLD thus reducing the margin available. So how does DJ rectify the problem of someone(?) not adhering to the limitations prescribed by Boeing? ... Simple, instead of ensure adequate training or recurrent training, apply a blanket procedure by which all crew must now adopt.

What ever happened to reading the books and knowing the limitations of the aircraft?

BTW, (LVL CHG 340) your post reeks of plagiarism .... did you come up with those ideas? Are they printed in an operating manual of the NG or were you provided them, spoon feed?
Macrohard is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2004, 11:05
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In a burrow
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Macrohardon,

Everyone knows about the FCTM speed limitations for holding above F250.

The procedure being discussed here (10 deg bank during cruise) is for just that - Cruise. It does not necessarily mean someone stalled and lost 6000' or whatever was quoted.

whatsitdoingnow seems to be an appropriate name to the thread starter.
Capt Basil Brush is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2004, 13:37
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UAE
Age: 55
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So Capt Toilet Brush , (you started it), if
Everyone knows about the FCTM speed limitations for holding above F250.
Just what is the story?

Why was a bulletin put out to the pilots, to change the procedure to select 10 degrees AoB upon reaching top of climb?

Oh, I've got it...... JR decides he feels like it!! Had to put a lot of thought into that one!

Why not ask a couple of the check Captains? That's where I got my story from!
Macrohard is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2004, 00:10
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: I'm TWO years old, it'd be a shame to ban me now......
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bunch of sissies. Can't believe you fly at 10 Deg AOB in the cruise. WHY???? WHat's ya problem??? Gonna stall the thing???

What a joke. Have you worked through the performance charts or did some dickless boffin tell you that was a good idea????

Get a spine-bone you guys and operate the thing like a jet like it's meant to be, you're making it 10X harder than it needs to be
Rind Skin is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.