Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Jetstars First Day- Any Feedback???

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstars First Day- Any Feedback???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th May 2004, 04:16
  #81 (permalink)  
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NO, it is a grave safety concern.

Using your logic, and as far as I am aware Impulse have had no emergency evacuations, why on Earth do Jetstar have flight attendants?

They are obviously NOT needed.
lame is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 04:29
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: utopia
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about this gem of logic? Lame's with Jetstar are paid more than the pilots. So lets just replace the Lame's with these wonder guys! They will tell you that they are much better anyway, just ask them.

But then, maybe it will be unsafe? It they are paid so little, then surely we can't be getting a particularly good product, can we?

Fly Jetstar. But make certain that your insurance is paid up.
Chuck Magutzup is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 04:53
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: In a box, ready for shipping...
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wasn't arguing with the logic or the debate - just trying to understand it.

No we haven't had any evacuations, but we've had an attempted hijacking.

Like I said in my last post (to wit no one has answered yet), WHY is this is a problem NOW given that this has been occurring for the last 4 years? How do you convince the beancounters and airline management (whom I also share contempt for in varying degrees) when history at this airline is proving opposite to the argument being made?

It's like the Flight Attendants to some degree. If the FAAA permitted (or in the case of the LAME's, didn't protest) to reduction in crew numbers, and said nothing for 4 years (publicly at least), could you expect anyone to take you seriously AFTER 4 YEARS of operating with reduced crew?

Is it not futile to make this argument AFTER the practice has been run for such a long time, versus making it before the airline (ie. IMPULSE) began operating?

Like I said (again in my last post) I don't agree with what's happened to the LAME's, but it's closing the stable door after the horse has bolted.

Chuck Magutzup - Eastern/Sunstate Cabin Crew are paid significantly less than mainline crew; even though they operate by themselves and have to deal with everything themselves.

"It they are paid so little, then surely we can't be getting a particularly good product, can we?
Since when has the Australian public equated worker pay with quality? So long as the price is right, very little matters.

Not how I think, but realistically, do Von and Nev from Albury consider the service Mary-Jo provides on her ABX-SYD flight to be of lesser quality because of what she is paid?
Mr Seatback 2 is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 05:13
  #84 (permalink)  
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

You have to look at the history of all this.

When Impulse were only virtually a GA outfit with Beech 1900 aircraft etc, they operated to different criteria and although probably safe enough, it was to lower standards than the Major Airlines.

When Qantas took them over, they used these criteria to operate a LCC, and as you said have operated since then more to those criteria, like the lack of LAMEs.

However now they have grown bigger, want to be seen as a Major Airline, and particularly once they get the A320s, they should operate to the same rules and criteria as any other Major Airline.
lame is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 05:37
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sydney NSW
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lame,

Quote:
I really do feel sorry for you if you work for Jetstar.


Lame, I feel sorry for you!

Quote:
I cannot see where you have ever asked a sensible question in your whole 6 posts.


Quote:
Whoever the Hell you are, with 2 posts, what on Earth gives you the right to specify the criteria for MY credibility.


You obviously believe that someone’s worth is directionally proportional to how many posts they have had on PPRuNe.

You obviously are someone of great importance as you have had over 300 posts, even though many of these are simply "cut and pastes" from newspapers. Weren’t you booted off of PPRuNe a couple of years back for exactly that same thing?

lame, get a life away from your computer that is always logged on to PPRuNe. There’s a whole world out there.

Phlanger is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 06:18
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: In a box, ready for shipping...
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see the point you're trying to make Lame.

Perhaps the ALAEA (is that the right spelling?) should have got up Impulse from the start - thus, preventing this issue from snowballing into what it is today?

Sure, no one could have predicted back in the 1900 days that Impulse would have turned into Jetstar - but from little acorns...

Guess it's a hard lesson learnt - and a hard fight to maintain!
Mr Seatback 2 is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 06:21
  #87 (permalink)  
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

PHlanger,

Golly yet another moron.

You register, and then use your first and only post to attack me, then you say that it is ME that should get a Life

I suppose you are from Jetstar too.

Mr Seatback 2,

Yes, that is all true sadly, it is probably too late now, unless public (passenger) pressure brings Jetstar into line.

Best regards,

Lame.
lame is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 06:33
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: utopia
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't understand why that bloke wanted to hijack that flight. If he'd realised it was an impulse / jetstar crew, he could have sat back and waited for the inevitable impact.
Chuck Magutzup is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 06:34
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lame -
I don't agree or disagree with you. But you have summed it up well.

"unless public (passenger) pressure brings Jetstar into line..."

Won't happen. Not if the fare is right. Sad but true.
ditzyboy is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 06:40
  #90 (permalink)  
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ditzyboy,

Thank you.

That is all I have been doing, expressing a point of view.

There is ONE way that will definitely bring about the necessary changes, but none of us want to see that happen.

Best regards,

Lame.
lame is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 06:54
  #91 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,523
Received 106 Likes on 60 Posts
I'm curious as to whether those that believe that LAME's are not required in this instance, also agree with the NAS? Pole's apart I know, but the principle behind it seems the same.

For the record, I feel this industry is being eroded from what it once was & should still be. No, I'm not talking about the "good old days" you, you, you young whipper snappers! A professional industry needs a professional attitude.

As the old saying goes; "Jack of all trades, Master of none!"
Buster Hyman is online now  
Old 30th May 2004, 07:08
  #92 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Global village
Age: 55
Posts: 3,025
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lightbulb

Mr Seatback 2 asks, "Why is it a problem now when it hasn't been in the past?

I think because of the planned 25 minute turnarounds that JetStar management are saying are crucial to their obtaining increased productivity.

25 minute turnarounds, with single aisle aircraft and full pax both ways (esp. if there are incap. pax), puts great pressure on ALL staff to "hurry up".
Not least of all the pilots, who - if they are following the international anti-hijack/terrorism procedures - cannot open the cockpit door with pax onboard.

Obviously the aircraft cannot depart until ALL the necessary boxes on the FMC's have been filled in and checked by BOTH crew members,and the T/O data and W&B checked.

Therefore, there is ONE area that leaves itself open to a quick, superficial glance - opening the door of opportunity to miss damage/faults that have occurred on the previous sector. That being the EXTERNAL walk-around check.

That, I believe is lame's point.
These same short turnarounds do NOT apply to the other airlines mentioned - and even then, there have been "oversights".
JetStar is putting ALL of their (reduced) staff under a lot more pressure, simply to try to put a few more pennies into the purse.
It's "fun" for about the first month, after that he novelty wears off, and the reality sets in that you are going to be expected to work like Mad Hatters for the entire rest of your career with this system in place.

The mob I'm with tried it for about 3 years, then gave it away, as cumulative delays eventually ended up in cancelled flights and very angry pax who deserted in droves.
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 07:52
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MEL
Posts: 178
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Meanwhile you still be SHARING that drink at the bar in LST

Although between QF,DJ & JQ you might just be able to afford 2 between the three of you....the FO's can fend for themselves

DJ737

The Roo Rooter
DJ737 is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 09:50
  #94 (permalink)  
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Woomera,

What do you mean I started it.

You mean by invading Poland.

Glad to see you have both good taste in TV shows and a good sense of humour.

Best regards,

Lame.

Sorry to put this here but you locked the interesting thread.

At least it will get this thread nearer to 100 posts and closure...
lame is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 09:51
  #95 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,980
Received 109 Likes on 62 Posts
Devil

Oi DJ737;
The F/O's can fend for themselves.
Don't the poor buggers always have to do just that?

You only live twice. Once when
you're born. Once when
you've looked death in the face.
Pinky the pilot is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 10:50
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boring Point
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

...strewth!...this lame who say's he ain't the lame that got canned last year is a bloody sight worse than the lame who did get canned...and I didn't think he was too bad!

The other lame that is...are you with me?

This current lame is a drongo!

PS: What's the big deal with 25 min turn arounds? We did it for years in Ansett and TAA! Sure, we would all like more but if you can't do it in 25 there's something wrong!
Obie is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 11:09
  #97 (permalink)  
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yet another new poster, who does nothing but insult people.

Judging by what you say, I guess you are another Jetstar person.

One BIG difference is that Ansett and TAA were REAL Airlines, with LAMEs doing preflights, so naturally the turnrounds were easier.

IF you are silly enough to try to do it all the time in 25 minutes, without Engineering assistance, then you really are an accident waiting to happen.

I just pray you don't take too many innocent passengers with you.

How is it that several of you new posters today, who all have nothing intelligent to say, even know what happened here last year or years ago?

Could it be that you are all so ashamed of Jetstar that you have to keep registering new names to hide behind.
lame is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 11:20
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most work for the dole projects look much the same really. Get used to it if you are under the QF umbrella in any way, shape or form. It's not about if any more, only when.
SeldomFixit is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 11:44
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canberra Aust
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I usually enjoy logging into to pprune when I have a chance.
It is a great forum. Only pitty is that some individuals turn it into a personal slanging match.

Raider1 is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 12:34
  #100 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Global village
Age: 55
Posts: 3,025
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talking

PS: What's the big deal with 25 min turn arounds? We did it for years in Ansett and TAA! Sure, we would all like more but if you can't do it in 25 there's something wrong!
No we didn't!
We did THROUGH flights (eg. BNE-ROK-MKY) with 20-25 minutes, and they were done with LAME's to cover the asses of any pilot who did a "cursory" check.

Today, I managed to pick up a job delivering Pizzas!
I have reduced the average time it normally takes the other guys to get from the Pizza Shop to the customer, from 12 minutes down to 10.
It meant exceeding the speed limit by about 10% - but hey, the cops allow a 10% error on your speedo anyway!
I also sped up for the orange (sliced the orange), and in a couple of cases might have just swallowed the cherry - but it was all legal.
The thing that REALLY gave me the balls to do it all, was knowing when to stop drinking, so that I was just under the legal allowable limit.

The Boss said that if they were gunna survive, they needed to increase the number of pizzas each of us could do in an hour.

Man, am I one hot dude now!
And the Boss has commended ME as THE one every other rider has got to aspire to be like!

Later on, the Boss told me that if I didn't want to put on my helmet (I ride a motorcycle) and my gloves, I could probably save the Company another minute or so.
I reckon it's worth it - you know, the chances of having a prang are like 1 in 160,000...........and I'm ALWAYS a careful driver!
Kaptin M is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.