LHR approach; muffled audio?
I wonder whether it is intentional that 119.725 has rather muffled audio compared with most other channels?
|
If there was a problem I am sure it would have been noticed and reported. Sounds fine where I am.
|
TCTC - Given your previous thread starts of LHR Fire/Tower and now approach having distorted/muffled radio, maybe it's not LHR's kit thats to blame....
|
I hadn't seen those posts but given that the Heathrow Approach suite is about 50 miles from Heathrow Tower I don't think there's a connection.
|
Anybody listen to Gatwick regularly? We are constantly having to repeat ourselves due to missed calls.
I am convinced the R/T is not clear enough. |
Gatwick problems might be down to crossing and poor RT discipline on a frequency which has become increasingly busy recently.
Long winded and slowly delivered first calls including every item except what the pilot had for breakfast tend to tie up the frequency for too long (particularly as someone else is sailing through the localiser!) I've not noticed the quality of the frequency at Gatwick being an issue as much as the RT discipline and if the RT is being tied up more than necessary then there will be more crossed and blocked transmissions. |
The audio quality from Swanwick TC is generally not brilliant, although it better than when LATCC first moved. Mixture of headset and the digital techniques used to send the audio to remote transmitter/receiver sites. Some sectors are better then others, and the newer designs of aircraft radios seem to suffer more. I can now understand the French better than the English!
|
I find Essex radar sound quality really bad. The rest of London seems OK
|
Many thanks for all the interesting comments.
(It might help the discussion if I humbly delcare my credentials: B.Sc. Communication Engineering and several decades experience in the technology and use of radio communications). |
Ofter there's nowt wrong with the kit, more to do with users' mic positioning that muffles audio.
Have seen pilots who are prcatically eating the mic, others who have it about a foot away, all that can be heard is a whimper above the carrier wave. And ATCOs can hold/wear headsets at all sorts of bizarre positions... but its the CAP670-compliant kit that's blamed... |
Originally Posted by JuicyLucy
(Post 9868350)
The audio quality from Swanwick TC is generally not brilliant, although it better than when LATCC first moved. Mixture of headset and the digital techniques used to send the audio to remote transmitter/receiver sites. Some sectors are better then others, and the newer designs of aircraft radios seem to suffer more. I can now understand the French better than the English!
I hate working 787's as their radio quality is awful. I do wonder if it's to do with the composite construction not accentuating the signal as much as metalic construction does? |
Juggler -- Have you raised those concerns further up? Can't say I notice any particular 787 effects from our side + also listening to colleagues also flying them...
Genuine Q. Is it all 787's? Or is the audio quality different between operators? (Thinking is this a headset thing, or aircraft radio...) |
The 787s of certain operators have a characteristic high pitched background hum - not enough to affect comms but distinctive enough that I know it's a 787 calling just from the sound. Somewhat reminiscent of Thunderbird 2 ;)
|
Used to happen on BAC 1-11s too - inverter whine I believe.
|
Originally Posted by Cough
(Post 9879341)
Genuine Q. Is it all 787's? Or is the audio quality different between operators? (Thinking is this a headset thing, or aircraft radio...)
|
Interesting - I wonder if its our headsets then as you say we are worse than others. I know there are folk looking at replacements as the Sennheisers that we currently use aren't being made anymore...
|
Concur with Juggler25. One can identify the 787 of certain operators just because of the high pitch whine on the carrier wave, and the speech does sound significantly more muffled than other types.
Upon reflection, I think all 787s have the muffled audio; but add in the whine then in a busy ops room with lots of ambient noise going on, and perhaps a crossed transmission, it gets quite difficult sometimes to understand some of them. |
@ Heathrow Director
You'll recall, I'm sure, that the BAC1-11 500 series transmissions always ended with a 'Houston Control' type bleep :-) |
Originally Posted by HEATHROW DIRECTOR
(Post 9879506)
Used to happen on BAC 1-11s too - inverter whine I believe.
|
787
I was going to post earlier with this retired old git's theory, that when a brand new aircraft off the line leaves the factory and is put through its paces in the air, the test pilots are using a particular make and even quality of headset, and then maybe the customer buys a different make.
I checked this out with the off-spring ( not the Swanwick ATCO, but the Airbus TP ) and it seems for once it my life I was absolutely right! He used to fly for Richard's airline and says their headsets were so cheap and poor that no decent music fan would ever use one! Add to that,he said, the fact that many pilots take their hats off and go to loudspeaker above a particular FL. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:50. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.