Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Continuous Descent Approaches

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Continuous Descent Approaches

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Aug 2003, 19:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Continuous Descent Approaches

Any ATC guys or gals have any info on CDA's @ STN. How as pilots are we meant to ensure we fly a CDA when most times we have no idea of how many track miles to touch down or when speed reduction will be required?
Well2do is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2003, 04:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southampton,hampshire,england
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W2d

Track miles........ask, what speed required.......ask. Try it next time and if you get no joy put it in a voyage report for CAA attention. The more often a pilot makes such a request the sooner ATC will start to give the information as a matter of routine.
055166k is online now  
Old 22nd Aug 2003, 22:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CDA's are impossible on 05 but for 23 you'll be given a range from touchdown with the descent to an altitude, it's then up to you. As far as speed are concerned, expect 220 kts on intermediate approach with 180 on base, and then 160 on final to four miles. If in doubt ASK!
Topofthestack is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2003, 17:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I regularly fly into LHR with 160 to 4. On the 340 and especially the 330 this is virtually impossible. My company has a 1000 stabalised approach policy. I recently asked a manager responsible for such matters his opinion. He advised me to cheat and take speed reduction at 5 nm. Sounds like one of those burnt or scolded situations??
MrBig is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2003, 18:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: EU
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you have performance concerns with your aeroplane [as has been said above] then let ATC know - preferably earlier rather than later! Certain 737 operators at our place routinely ask for 170 to 5d; not a problem at all as long as you ask early enough.
1261 is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2003, 17:47
  #6 (permalink)  
Ohcirrej
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As 1261 says, if you have requirements on final approach, if you tell us with plenty of time, we can do something about it (eg: 777-300s and some 737s request 170kts on final).

I am a little concerned about MrBig's comment about being advised to cheat and reduce at 5 miles. In no way am I telling people how to fly jets or amI crusising for a flight, but reducing speed 1 miles early without telling the radar guy can be a major pain in the a$$ (wake vortex separation comes to mind).
Jerricho is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2003, 07:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunny Warwickshire
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bring back FAM flights.

Or maybe crews could visit ATC units and tell them that 160 to 4 is unrealistic for that type of aircraft, and tell us what they can realistically do.

I was training a guy the other day and he had no idea that the BRt E145 reduces to 240kts below FL100, if he had known, his plan (which worked in the end after a lot of vectoring) would have been different. I knew because I've talked to the crews that fly them, would never get to the pointy end, but they came to see us and we talked.

Anybody know about EZY operational requirement for 250kts below FL100???
They are required to be 250kts below FL100 UNLESS specifically asked by ATC to keep high speed which they will and frequently do.
radar707 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.