Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

US shutdown. ATC getting close to breaking point?


Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

US shutdown. ATC getting close to breaking point?

Old 2nd November 2025 | 20:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 762
Likes: 198
From: London
US shutdown. ATC getting close to breaking point?

The inference is that our colleagues across the pond are phoning in sick and picking up a “McJob” to raise cash while they’re not being paid.

BBC story

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm277455158o
Del Prado is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2025 | 05:58
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 707
Likes: 103
From: Mauritius,soon or latter
We have just passed " non paid" period...I would say that the most common feeling was ..." we are not guilty- why there is no money..."
So, I could understand FAA coleagues..

My question is another: How did you manage 90% of traffic if 80% of people was on sick leave?"
SINGAPURCANAC is offline  
Reply
Old 5th November 2025 | 03:46
  #3 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 138
Likes: 42
From: Waharoa, New Zealand
NYT reports that Duffy is about to shut down parts of the National Airspace System

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/04/u...pY_yOiDOAr35Wg

"For his part, Mr. Duffy, the transportation secretary, warned of “mass chaos” in the skies.“You will see mass chaos, you will see mass flight delays, you will see mass cancellations,” he said during a news conference, accusing Democrats of perpetuating what he called a “senseless shutdown.”

“And you may see us close certain parts of the airspace because we just cannot manage it because we don’t have the air traffic controllers,” he said."
Chris2303 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th November 2025 | 08:47
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 762
Likes: 198
From: London
Up to 10% reduction in flights next week.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2kp8dex14xo
Del Prado is offline  
Reply
Old 6th November 2025 | 17:28
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 88
Likes: 29
From: in a field
I'm sure this will not help the long term situation. Under these circumstances does OJT and general training continue?

If not the future controller shortage will be made much worse. Reducing training at any point creates issues further on.



sheepless is offline  
Reply
Old 6th November 2025 | 17:58
  #6 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 142
Likes: 96
From: Bucharest
At first I thought this was a hoax, but no, it seems to be real:


The Twitter/X message, in case it's not shown automatically:

About to take off

Pilot gets on the intercom, says he got “some weird routing” due to ATC staffing issues

We’ll be flying the entire flight at 8,000ft, “four times lower than normal”

“Upside is you’ll have some great views!”

Wish me luck fam

https://www.flightaware.com/live/fli...657Z/KJFK/KORF

Last edited by MikeSnow; 6th November 2025 at 18:02. Reason: Added Flight Aware link
MikeSnow is offline  
Reply
Old 6th November 2025 | 19:42
  #7 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1997
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 4,451
Likes: 1,164
From: Europe
Originally Posted by MikeSnow
At first I thought this was a hoax, but no, it seems to be real:
F
If that is a trend , it is worrying as there are normally a lot of VFR below 10.000 ft and in class E no radio communications is not required for VFR , and transponders are not mandatory either Not a very good idea to put an airliner doing 400Kts cruising in that airspace I would say .
ATC Watcher is offline  
Reply
Old 6th November 2025 | 20:10
  #8 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 38
From: UK
In fairness, 2 years ago I did JFK-DCA at 8000 due to weather related airspace management. Was actually a lovely flight to be on if a bit weird.

As a side effect here, surely the knock on effect is that commuting crew are going to find it increasingly hard to get to their bases to actually operate the flights that are going?
Dannyboy39 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2025 | 01:11
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 421
Likes: 40
From: California
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
If that is a trend , it is worrying as there are normally a lot of VFR below 10.000 ft and in class E no radio communications is not required for VFR , and transponders are not mandatory either Not a very good idea to put an airliner doing 400Kts cruising in that airspace I would say .
In this case he would be doing 250Kts, but that's still a lot faster than most GA. And a late arrival to boot.
MarcK is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2025 | 08:25
  #10 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1997
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 4,451
Likes: 1,164
From: Europe
Originally Posted by MarcK
In this case he would be doing 250Kts, but that's still a lot faster than most GA. And a late arrival to boot.
Can't you ask to wave the 250 speed restriction in the US ? we can in Europe , and it is done rather regularly.
But even at 250 Kts seeing an avoiding a glider doing 60Kts using the cockpit windows of a E170 is not that evident not to mention the maneuverability , an E170 is not an F16.. .
ATC Watcher is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2025 | 13:23
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 762
Likes: 198
From: London
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
Can't you ask to wave the 250 speed restriction in the US ? we can in Europe , and it is done rather regularly.
But even at 250 Kts seeing an avoiding a glider doing 60Kts using the cockpit windows of a E170 is not that evident not to mention the maneuverability , an E170 is not an F16.. .
In class A that’s fine but I think we’re talking about class E (and G) here?
Del Prado is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2025 | 15:33
  #12 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,457
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
But even at 250 Kts seeing an avoiding a glider doing 60Kts using the cockpit windows of a E170 is not that evident not to mention the maneuverability , an E170 is not an F16.. .
In 1965, I successfully missed a Britannia whilst in the equivalent of Class E airspace while soaring over Bovingdon at 35kts, the base being 1500ft amsl and the bottom of the 'Class E' being 5000ft amsl. I was helped because I was open cockpit so I could hear the Britannia coming; I don''t think he saw me.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2025 | 15:42
  #13 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,457
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
If that is a trend , it is worrying as there are normally a lot of VFR below 10.000 ft and in class E no radio communications is not required for VFR , and transponders are not mandatory either Not a very good idea to put an airliner doing 400Kts cruising in that airspace I would say .
Nothing to stop an operator filing an IFR flight plan in Class E airspace however I'm thinking in terms of UK rules rather than USA rules.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 8th November 2025 | 09:07
  #14 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1997
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 4,451
Likes: 1,164
From: Europe
Originally Posted by chevvron
Nothing to stop an operator filing an IFR flight plan in Class E airspace however I'm thinking in terms of UK rules rather than USA rules.
No of course not ., also in the US , it is not filing an IFR PLN which is the issue for me but doing so with a fast jet at low altitude. Although E is officially a "controlled: airspace , separation with VFR is not assured, It is one thing to cross it climbing or descending , as done regularly , but a bit less for an Airliner cruising for over an hour in it at low altitude
ATC Watcher is offline  
Reply
Old 10th November 2025 | 17:28
  #15 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 88
Likes: 29
From: in a field
There must be a critical mass of controllers in an organisation. Once you drop below it permanent flow restrictions could be in place for a number of years.

The less experienced at the coal face the more difficult training becomes and with system upgrades the experienced controllers required for development and new system training - things could get critical very easily.

Not allowing for the people who move to greener pastures as things deteriorate.

One thing I observed over the years is that training can be the weakest link. The positive - strict flow regulations might make the training OJT easier.
sheepless is offline  
Reply
Old 10th November 2025 | 17:33
  #16 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 871
Likes: 674
From: Budapest
I heard that DT is recommending that dissatisfied Controllers leave the service - that'll help.
Expatrick is online now  
Reply
Old 10th November 2025 | 19:52
  #17 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 1
From: Scotland
No idea how the ATC system works or the professionalism of those who work in it. 🙄
No idea how the ATC system works or the professionalism of those who work in it. 🙄
C_M_I is offline  
Reply
Old 10th November 2025 | 22:37
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 489
From: A place in the sun
What utter nonsense!
Bergerie1 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th November 2025 | 15:24
  #19 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 114
From: jersey
In the light of the BBCAffair; is this real ? Who knows, nowadays ? If this is just another attempt to make Trump seem foolish, please refrain from posting any bogus quotes attributable to Trump. He is more than capable of establishing his stupidity without any help from anyone else. If this is a genuine quote; the mind boggles ! How is he going to “quickly replace”ATCOs, for one thing ?
kcockayne is offline  
Reply
Old 11th November 2025 | 19:03
  #20 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 1,702
Likes: 1,085
From: USA
Originally Posted by kcockayne
In the light of the BBCAffair; is this real ? Who knows, nowadays ? If this is just another attempt to make Trump seem foolish, please refrain from posting any bogus quotes attributable to Trump. He is more than capable of establishing his stupidity without any help from anyone else. If this is a genuine quote; the mind boggles ! How is he going to “quickly replace”ATCOs, for one thing ?
Here's the post: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldT...26123205979749
MechEngr is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.