![]() |
US shutdown. ATC getting close to breaking point?
The inference is that our colleagues across the pond are phoning in sick and picking up a “McJob” to raise cash while they’re not being paid.
BBC story https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm277455158o |
We have just passed " non paid" period...I would say that the most common feeling was ..." we are not guilty- why there is no money..."
So, I could understand FAA coleagues.. My question is another: How did you manage 90% of traffic if 80% of people was on sick leave?" |
NYT reports that Duffy is about to shut down parts of the National Airspace System
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/04/u...pY_yOiDOAr35Wg "For his part, Mr. Duffy, the transportation secretary, warned of “mass chaos” in the skies.“You will see mass chaos, you will see mass flight delays, you will see mass cancellations,” he said during a news conference, accusing Democrats of perpetuating what he called a “senseless shutdown.” “And you may see us close certain parts of the airspace because we just cannot manage it because we don’t have the air traffic controllers,” he said." |
|
I'm sure this will not help the long term situation. Under these circumstances does OJT and general training continue?
If not the future controller shortage will be made much worse. Reducing training at any point creates issues further on. |
At first I thought this was a hoax, but no, it seems to be real:
The Twitter/X message, in case it's not shown automatically: About to take off Pilot gets on the intercom, says he got “some weird routing” due to ATC staffing issues We’ll be flying the entire flight at 8,000ft, “four times lower than normal” “Upside is you’ll have some great views!” Wish me luck fam https://www.flightaware.com/live/fli...657Z/KJFK/KORF |
Originally Posted by MikeSnow
(Post 11984265)
At first I thought this was a hoax, but no, it seems to be real:
F |
In fairness, 2 years ago I did JFK-DCA at 8000 due to weather related airspace management. Was actually a lovely flight to be on if a bit weird.
As a side effect here, surely the knock on effect is that commuting crew are going to find it increasingly hard to get to their bases to actually operate the flights that are going? |
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
(Post 11984311)
If that is a trend , it is worrying as there are normally a lot of VFR below 10.000 ft and in class E no radio communications is not required for VFR , and transponders are not mandatory either Not a very good idea to put an airliner doing 400Kts cruising in that airspace I would say .
|
Originally Posted by MarcK
(Post 11984450)
In this case he would be doing 250Kts, but that's still a lot faster than most GA. And a late arrival to boot.
But even at 250 Kts seeing an avoiding a glider doing 60Kts using the cockpit windows of a E170 is not that evident not to mention the maneuverability , an E170 is not an F16.. . |
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
(Post 11984605)
Can't you ask to wave the 250 speed restriction in the US ? we can in Europe , and it is done rather regularly.
But even at 250 Kts seeing an avoiding a glider doing 60Kts using the cockpit windows of a E170 is not that evident not to mention the maneuverability , an E170 is not an F16.. . |
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
(Post 11984605)
But even at 250 Kts seeing an avoiding a glider doing 60Kts using the cockpit windows of a E170 is not that evident not to mention the maneuverability , an E170 is not an F16.. .
|
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
(Post 11984311)
If that is a trend , it is worrying as there are normally a lot of VFR below 10.000 ft and in class E no radio communications is not required for VFR , and transponders are not mandatory either Not a very good idea to put an airliner doing 400Kts cruising in that airspace I would say .
|
Originally Posted by chevvron
(Post 11984859)
Nothing to stop an operator filing an IFR flight plan in Class E airspace however I'm thinking in terms of UK rules rather than USA rules.
|
There must be a critical mass of controllers in an organisation. Once you drop below it permanent flow restrictions could be in place for a number of years.
The less experienced at the coal face the more difficult training becomes and with system upgrades the experienced controllers required for development and new system training - things could get critical very easily. Not allowing for the people who move to greener pastures as things deteriorate. One thing I observed over the years is that training can be the weakest link. The positive - strict flow regulations might make the training OJT easier. |
I heard that DT is recommending that dissatisfied Controllers leave the service - that'll help.
|
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....24c9915c0.jpeg
No idea how the ATC system works or the professionalism of those who work in it. 🙄 |
What utter nonsense!
|
In the light of the BBCAffair; is this real ? Who knows, nowadays ? If this is just another attempt to make Trump seem foolish, please refrain from posting any bogus quotes attributable to Trump. He is more than capable of establishing his stupidity without any help from anyone else. If this is a genuine quote; the mind boggles ! How is he going to “quickly replace”ATCOs, for one thing ?
|
Originally Posted by kcockayne
(Post 11987182)
In the light of the BBCAffair; is this real ? Who knows, nowadays ? If this is just another attempt to make Trump seem foolish, please refrain from posting any bogus quotes attributable to Trump. He is more than capable of establishing his stupidity without any help from anyone else. If this is a genuine quote; the mind boggles ! How is he going to “quickly replace”ATCOs, for one thing ?
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 17:12. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.