about the separation between departing aircraft and the following landing aircraft
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: beijing
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
about the separation between departing aircraft and the following landing aircraft
in chapter 8 of ICAO doc 4444 -ATS surveillance services, the separation between the departing aircraft and following arrival aircraft is not specified, so, when can the controller in tower can instruct an aircraft to take off based on the position of arrival aircraft on final ? and what's the logic behind it?
and in this article: "Two minutes are required between take-offs when the preceding aircraft is 74 km/h (40 kt) or more faster than the following aircraft and both aircraft will follow the same track" what kind of speed does it mean ? cruising speed or the actual speed in the phase of departure?
thanks!
and in this article: "Two minutes are required between take-offs when the preceding aircraft is 74 km/h (40 kt) or more faster than the following aircraft and both aircraft will follow the same track" what kind of speed does it mean ? cruising speed or the actual speed in the phase of departure?
thanks!
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Way north
Age: 46
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
in chapter 8 of ICAO doc 4444 -ATS surveillance services, the separation between the departing aircraft and following arrival aircraft is not specified, so, when can the controller in tower can instruct an aircraft to take off based on the position of arrival aircraft on final ? and what's the logic behind it?
and in this article: "Two minutes are required between take-offs when the preceding aircraft is 74 km/h (40 kt) or more faster than the following aircraft and both aircraft will follow the same track" what kind of speed does it mean ? cruising speed or the actual speed in the phase of departure?
thanks!
and in this article: "Two minutes are required between take-offs when the preceding aircraft is 74 km/h (40 kt) or more faster than the following aircraft and both aircraft will follow the same track" what kind of speed does it mean ? cruising speed or the actual speed in the phase of departure?
thanks!
What most approach controllers do, is either by standard agreement between TWR and APP, or individually, release aircraft with reference to arriving aircraft. Then the TWR controller can apply "reduced separation in vicinity of an airport", hence see both aircraft and determine there is no risk of collision, and thereby get well below normal surveillance separation.
On days with bad weather, where the "vicinity separation" also known as TWR-separation, cannot be used, there are a few "procedural separations", like the departure has to depart before the arrival reaches 5 NM final etc. Most TWR controllers will gladly accept releases with reference to arriving aircraft, and apply whatever separation is available depending on weather.
40 kts? It says 40 kts.... so the speed difference has to be 40 kts... if you take the TAS from their flightplan, I'd say you need to have a chat with your OJTI again.... But that could vary from place to place... but the way I was taught was we consider actual speed of the aircraft. (I've seen TAS from the flightplan used during basic training, just for the students to get a feel for it, and not "overburden" them)
Aircraft are deemed to be separated if the distance between them is constant or increasing thus as a departure is accelerating and an arrival is decelerating, it's up to the tower controller to decide the departure separation.
Aircraft are deemed to be separated if the distance between them is constant or increasing thus as a departure is accelerating and an arrival is decelerating, it's up to the tower controller to decide the departure separation.
2 s
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Gulf
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In an ICAO environment the departing aircraft needs to have crossed the upwind end of the runway prior to the arriving aircraft crossing the landing threshold. This assumes no reduced runway separation (RRSM) is being used. How the tower controller achieves it is usually based on experience, but will be dependent on weather conditions also i.e. VMC/IMC.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Deepest darkest Inbredland....
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In an ICAO environment the departing aircraft needs to have crossed the upwind end of the runway prior to the arriving aircraft crossing the landing threshold. This assumes no reduced runway separation (RRSM) is being used. How the tower controller achieves it is usually based on experience, but will be dependent on weather conditions also i.e. VMC/IMC.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Gulf
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 44
Posts: 4,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Way north
Age: 46
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The "runway separation" is the only directly defined separation for us TWR controllers... technically we just have to ensure that separation.... and that goes for IFR and VFR. Though there's the either "passed the upwind, or have started a turn out", which is really helpfull when squeezing in those VFR departures.
(Other than that, we fall under the "safe, orderly and expeditious flow" and "prevent collision". But that "runway separation" is ofcourse not something approach can use as a separation (where I've worked at least), they only have the option of having tower help with the "reducing separation in vicinity of airport" for them.)
(Other than that, we fall under the "safe, orderly and expeditious flow" and "prevent collision". But that "runway separation" is ofcourse not something approach can use as a separation (where I've worked at least), they only have the option of having tower help with the "reducing separation in vicinity of airport" for them.)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: beijing
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The standard surveillance separation is 5 nm, or any other depending on the minimum separation the unit has. And that is the surveillance separation between arrivals and departures as well.
What most approach controllers do, is either by standard agreement between TWR and APP, or individually, release aircraft with reference to arriving aircraft. Then the TWR controller can apply "reduced separation in vicinity of an airport", hence see both aircraft and determine there is no risk of collision, and thereby get well below normal surveillance separation.
On days with bad weather, where the "vicinity separation" also known as TWR-separation, cannot be used, there are a few "procedural separations", like the departure has to depart before the arrival reaches 5 NM final etc. Most TWR controllers will gladly accept releases with reference to arriving aircraft, and apply whatever separation is available depending on weather.
40 kts? It says 40 kts.... so the speed difference has to be 40 kts... if you take the TAS from their flightplan, I'd say you need to have a chat with your OJTI again.... But that could vary from place to place... but the way I was taught was we consider actual speed of the aircraft. (I've seen TAS from the flightplan used during basic training, just for the students to get a feel for it, and not "overburden" them)
What most approach controllers do, is either by standard agreement between TWR and APP, or individually, release aircraft with reference to arriving aircraft. Then the TWR controller can apply "reduced separation in vicinity of an airport", hence see both aircraft and determine there is no risk of collision, and thereby get well below normal surveillance separation.
On days with bad weather, where the "vicinity separation" also known as TWR-separation, cannot be used, there are a few "procedural separations", like the departure has to depart before the arrival reaches 5 NM final etc. Most TWR controllers will gladly accept releases with reference to arriving aircraft, and apply whatever separation is available depending on weather.
40 kts? It says 40 kts.... so the speed difference has to be 40 kts... if you take the TAS from their flightplan, I'd say you need to have a chat with your OJTI again.... But that could vary from place to place... but the way I was taught was we consider actual speed of the aircraft. (I've seen TAS from the flightplan used during basic training, just for the students to get a feel for it, and not "overburden" them)
but in non-radar environment or just procedural control environment , how can you know in real time the actual speed of a departing aircraft the speed of which is increasing ?
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: wherever will have me
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Gulf
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you can't judge it visually then yes, although I've never felt the need to do that to an arrival inside 4nm or so. A knowledge of aircraft performance is usually enough and if you're fortunate enough to have radar in the tower then reference to ground speed/Mode S usually does the trick.
NATS controllers at Gatwick did it at a shorter range than that; I was on the flight deck of a '737 and from 4 mile final, 3 aircraft were cleared for departure before we got landing clearance.
NATS controllers at Gatwick did it at a shorter range than that; I was on the flight deck of a '737 and from 4 mile final, 3 aircraft were cleared for departure before we got landing clearance.
2 s
others might describe Gatwick as the worldwide standard bearer for efficient single runway operations.
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Way north
Age: 46
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
4 miles final and 3 departures? That’s 3 departures in less than 2 minutes.... if your 737 is doing 120 on final, and the departures use 40 seconds to get airborne... it’s barely doable.
I’d personally believe in 2 departures.... unless something small you can get out of the way fast.
I’d personally believe in 2 departures.... unless something small you can get out of the way fast.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever someone will pay me to do fun stuff
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Radar screen: https://yadi.sk/i/bavSJqLSzXQ63A
Join Date: May 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wake turbulence is an increasing threat in the training world - at one airfield in particular with a low to medium flow rate I/my student has been well inside 4nm (Light) when a departure (Medium or greater) has been released. Marginal but manageable, except we're planned/announced to go around not to land. And a reasonable headwind, putting the ensuing wake turbulence neatly in our climbout lane. Individual tower controllers vary with awareness and negotiation on this - some are excellent once the issue has been recognised by offering alternatives, others are perhaps not as aware from the training or organisational background.
Training is complex for all, but the majority of instrument training does need the full approach to be truly valid - particularly on a test where to complete an approach for my candidate they need the opportunity to fly it to procedure minima. On the flip side, while training traffic may be a little slower to respond to calls/not perfectly accurate at times, all IFR training is done with a suitably qualified adult observing/commanding, which ought to control the risk level a bit.
Really very happy to discuss this with ATCOs/arrange liaison flights once easily possibly to try and foster understanding on all sides, since ultimately we're all working towards the same aim of minimum paperwork/maximum achievement!
Training is complex for all, but the majority of instrument training does need the full approach to be truly valid - particularly on a test where to complete an approach for my candidate they need the opportunity to fly it to procedure minima. On the flip side, while training traffic may be a little slower to respond to calls/not perfectly accurate at times, all IFR training is done with a suitably qualified adult observing/commanding, which ought to control the risk level a bit.
Really very happy to discuss this with ATCOs/arrange liaison flights once easily possibly to try and foster understanding on all sides, since ultimately we're all working towards the same aim of minimum paperwork/maximum achievement!
