Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Gatco Legal Cover

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jul 2002, 15:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: scotland
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Gatco Legal Cover

Does anyone out there have any up to date info on what legal cover being a GATCO member entitles you to in the event of a court case involving an Air Traffic incident. With the impending F15 trial about to start rumour has it that the cover some of us think we have is not what it seems.
KPax is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2002, 22:06
  #2 (permalink)  
StandupfortheUlstermen
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of Wurzelsetshire
Age: 53
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No idea, but I was under the impression that Gatco have a corporate insurance policy that would cover any costs that may arise (probably with a £50K limit or so).
The cover is supposed to be paid for by part of the monthy subscription, so if it turns out that any ATCO is refused cover under the Gatco scheme, we should all collectively ask for our money back.
Standard Noise is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2002, 09:32
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most controllers rely on their Union for such support but .........

NATS controllers that believe Prospect will cover Legal Expenses should think again.

Since April I've been trying to get Prospect Headquarters to confirm the level of Legal Support given to a controller in the event of a disaster.

On the 16th April , a Tracey Thornton of Prospect assured me that Ian Findlay (Aviation Officer ) would contact me with the information. So far nothing heard!!!

My Local Reps are unable to provide factual information and I cannot find any references to Legal Aid beyond that covered by Health and Safety Legislation.

Perhaps another reason to dump Prospect.
qwerty2 is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2002, 21:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: South West of Heathrow
Age: 38
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qwerty2 .....Perhaps another reason to follow the correct processes rather than dump the union.

If you take this concern to your reps, they will pass it up via the BEC (ie the representative structure) and you will get an answer.

It may be not be the answer you want as in all legal matters the edges can be grey.

I read the ATCOs' branch have a new National Officer who, i believe is David Luxton.

Going on the pay example, follow the right process and you might get a proper answer.
HounslowHarry is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2002, 07:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't be ridiculous HounslowHarry. We have been trying
through every means to get an answer on this question
from Prospect for months. As you are so confident perhaps you would like to follow the procedure you suggest and post the official response here. Please do.
torpids is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.