Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

ATC, what are you expecting?

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

ATC, what are you expecting?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jan 2017, 15:25
  #1 (permalink)  
AF1
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Aotearoa
Age: 54
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATC, what are you expecting?

(In advance, I know very similar questions have been posted - but can't find the precise example as below - most appear related to STAR clearance)

In an ICAO member country, if given a "When ready, descend to XXX, be level by YYYYY" and then subsequently instructed "Descend to ZZZ": If the second level assignment is lower then the first, are you expected to comply with the previous "Be level by" restriction?

This is NOT in regards to a descend via STAR clearance.

---
Example:

*ATC*: KLM501 Descend FL200, be level by EPSIL
*KLM501*: (Readback)
*ATC*: KLM501 Continue Descent FL120

So, does KLM501 have to comply the with the previous EPSIL/FL200 restriction ?

And ... have you got a reference? Doc 4444 seems not to cover it.
AF1 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2017, 16:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: EU
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not ATC and don't have a reference but I discussed something similar with a controller before and the general answer was that they would probably expect you to still meet the restriction but technically they should repeat the restriction with the new clearance as otherwise it doesn't apply anymore.
OhNoCB is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2017, 18:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: inmysuitcase
Posts: 209
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they would probably expect


That does not work with me
testpanel is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2017, 19:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In The U.K., every clearance cancels a previous clearance, so unless the controller states otherwise, any conditions attached to the previous clearance are also cancelled.
If in doubt, please check with ATC.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2017, 00:15
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: FZFG
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AF1
Example:

*ATC*: KLM501 Descend FL200, be level by EPSIL
*KLM501*: (Readback)
*ATC*: KLM501 Continue Descent FL120

So, does KLM501 have to comply the with the previous EPSIL/FL200 restriction ?
As a controller I would definitely restate the restriction by EPSIL, if it's still needed. The "continue descent FL120" clearance could be ambiguous otherwise.

By all means, when in doubt please ask!
mebur_verce is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2017, 11:51
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As Zooker states, any clearance cancels the previous. If I still wanted you to meet the "level by" I would restate it.
Glamdring is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2017, 14:27
  #7 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good old rule learnt 50 years ago and still valid : "never assume, check or confirm ".
Pilot : If in doubt pilot ask confirmation if restriction is still valid.
Controller: when re-clearing and restriction still apply, state it again .
Did that ( or at least tried to ) for the 35 years I did ATC , and taught that to my trainees.Never had a problem as a result.
Another good old rule : "Common sense is better than Doc4444."
ATC Watcher is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.