Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Update on vacancies

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Update on vacancies

Reply

Old 25th Nov 2016, 11:24
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 4
throw a dyce - I couldn't agree more. I'm just grateful I'm retired - and I never thought I would hear myself say that. Sad times for UK ATC.
Norwegian Blue is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th Nov 2016, 23:41
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 52
Completely agree with the above comment. It's a brave new world ... until automation
GASA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th Nov 2016, 11:47
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 40
Posts: 88
There won“t be automation in our lifetime. Too many unknown variables, no computer in this world can calculate with these, especially down low.
eagleflyer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th Nov 2016, 13:12
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: behind the fruit
Posts: 231
Great time for jobs mobility in the UK as the Nats monopoly is breaking up. No doubt there'll be more to come!
LEGAL TENDER is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th Nov 2016, 13:17
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: jersey
Age: 68
Posts: 996
I joined ATC at LATCC in June 1971. At Christmas that year I was told by a person who owned some sort of computer company that I was facing an uncertain future as computers would make ATCOS redundant within a few years. I completed 37 years as an ATCO in 2008 & have been retired since then. In those 45 years ATCOS have been, & are still doing, basically the same jobs in the same ways. I know that there has been a gradual introduction of various computer aided tools & systems, but how long will it take before ATCOS really are redundant ? I don't think that I will ever see it !
kcockayne is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th Nov 2016, 13:32
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 39
Posts: 4,209
Of course there will be automation. There already is.

We pass 90% of our airways clearances with no ATCO interaction at all.

Doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out where the intention is for the future. Whether it's deliverable in the desired timescale is another thing.
Gonzo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th Nov 2016, 14:40
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: jersey
Age: 68
Posts: 996
Yes, gonzo. I appreciate that sort of thing, pointsmerge , CPDLC etc. And I know that these innovations will continue; & gather pace. But, the point of my question is , how long will it take before the ATCO is no longer sitting in front of the RADAR taking the decisions ? Any idea ?
kcockayne is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th Nov 2016, 16:17
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 73
Posts: 8,192
KC... It must have been 45+ years ago when I was working GMP in the tower a bright chap came and sat next to me. "What are you up to?" I asked. "Replacing you with a computer chip" was the reply. I told him he would be better off working out how to run the EG list on a chip. Never heard nor saw him again...
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th Nov 2016, 16:31
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 39
Posts: 4,209
Sorry kcockayne, wasn't aiming my post at you.

But when you see what effect iFACTS has had on controllers over the years, in that the vast majority of the time the proposed resolutions are followed (and I'm prepared to be corrected), the controller will have fewer decisions to make, and fewer interventions.

I can see a similar transition in the future on Ground and Air in terms of departure sequence, the optimum sequence is presented to the controllers, and the 'best' taxy route is suggested.

HD, there are issues with it of course, and some of them are of our own making, but our kit is pretty good at determining an optimum departure sequence and from that the start order.

Controllers won't go away by any means, but the job at the major airports will be very different in 10-15 years than it is now.

Anyway, I don't want to get into this again.
Gonzo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th Nov 2016, 16:37
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 52
We might be saved a while by airlines and airports being cheap. I work at a fairly busy airport and CPDLC is probably only used half the time, lots of airlines don't want to pay for it. And our kit in the tower is hardly cutting edge...

I'll be worried when some higher ups come in and declare they're going to invest loads of money in the operation.
GASA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th Nov 2016, 16:53
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 39
Posts: 4,209
Yes, all the Gucci stuff is not cheap!
Gonzo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th Nov 2016, 19:46
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In the South !
Posts: 194
I can see a similar transition in the future on Ground and Air in terms of departure sequence, the optimum sequence is presented to the controllers, and the 'best' taxy route is suggested.
Unless you only have a single taxy route and no run up areas to integrate with GA.

Controllers won't go away by any means, but the job at the major airports will be very different in 10-15 years than it is now.
Hurrah for the minor airports - keeping their place as the best apprenticeship for controllers.
ATCO Fred is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th Nov 2016, 19:49
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In the South !
Posts: 194
Yes, all the Gucci stuff is not cheap!
until it becomes cheaper than an ATCO. Units are run lean these days as SOP. . . the gap will become less as technology advances / becomes cheaper as it has already proven to do so.
ATCO Fred is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th Nov 2016, 19:04
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: 29 Acacia Road
Posts: 122
that sort of thing, pointsmerge , CPDLC etc.
Point merge, quite literally, is a complete waste of space.
landedoutagain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th Nov 2016, 20:27
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever someone will pay me to do fun stuff
Posts: 928
Yes, all the Gucci stuff is not cheap!
But in Europe we are heading toward a situation where only stuff approved by the European Commission/EASA can be used. And the approval process will be so complex and costly that only a small number of manufacturers, perhaps only the ones that paid their dues by supporting SESAR (like Thales, Leonardo and Indra), will have approved stuff available. And they will need to recover their costs from a, possibly relatively small user base, and no doubt add a premium to recover the cost of supporting the SESAR project.

So the kit is unlikely to to become cheaper than the controllers for a while yet.

And never forget that all of this is to ensure that aviation in Europe is safe.

But to be more serious, or more correctly, less cynical, the real problem is that human controllers will be replaced by the kit because it will be faster or be able to handle more complex tasks than the human. Then, if the kit fails, where do we turn to get the job done? But, for just a moment there I forgot, it won't fail because it will have been approved by EASA......

(Sorry, didn't manage to get less cynical, ho hum.....)
LookingForAJob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th Nov 2016, 19:05
  #56 (permalink)  
StandupfortheUlstermen
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of Wurzelsetshire
Age: 47
Posts: 1,180
I seem to spend increasing amounts making Camelot more profitable. Seems to be a theme at my unit. Bring on the automation I say!

Happiest bloke I know stacks bread on the shelves in our local Tesco, always smiling, always whistling a wee tune. Sometimes I envy him.
Standard Noise is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th Nov 2016, 21:08
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 350
Pretty sure shelf stacking will be automated entirely before ATC
T250 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th Nov 2016, 22:18
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: farfaraway
Posts: 162
Happiest bloke I know stacks bread on the shelves in our local Tesco, always smiling, always whistling a wee tune. Sometimes I envy him.


Yep £7;50 an hour, happy as a sandboy and here's me at Swanwick 0n £110000 a year and totally p####d off, what a funny old world.
obwan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th Nov 2016, 09:34
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Unknown
Posts: 38
Originally Posted by obwan View Post
Happiest bloke I know stacks bread on the shelves in our local Tesco, always smiling, always whistling a wee tune. Sometimes I envy him.


Yep £7;50 an hour, happy as a sandboy and here's me at Swanwick 0n £110000 a year and totally p####d off, what a funny old world.
When I was younger my parents told me that money doesn't buy happiness, I'm starting to see they might have been (begrudgingly) right!!
Will_McKenzie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th Nov 2016, 10:02
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: farfaraway
Posts: 162
When I was younger my parents told me that money doesn't buy happiness, I'm starting to see they might have been (begrudgingly) right!!

Watched aprog. on the box some time ago which was about billionaires and the super wealthy and the question was asked, are the super rich really happy, to which the reply was , probably not, but they are a lot happier than the super poor. The End.
obwan is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service