Birmingham drops Nats
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: London
Age: 50
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Birmingham drops Nats
Does anyone have any rumors about what is happening with Birmingham after they decided to not renew with Nats? Are the ATCO staying, or leaving with Nats?
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dorset
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HEATHROW DIRECTOR
Well they sure won't train Gatwick ATCOs overnight and it's Tower only there.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sarf England
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've already sold my shares
LTP
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most airport operators are only interested in the bottom line. That is why using airports is almost always a painful experience.
So really whoever the ATC provider is at BHX and LGW their level of service is the same, but the price they offer their services at is different.
To say otherwise is to open a can of worms is it not?
LTP
"After all, it's well known in NATS that profits are almost completely driven by the airports side of the business.... Isn't it?" - unless anything has radically changed over the past two year the answer is "NO".
NATS is divided into two companies NATS Services (NSL) and NATS En-route (NERL). The real money spinner for NATS is NERL.
Since the last recession most (if not all) airport operators have been screwing NSL into the ground over costs, demanding more for less. Rumour has it in NATS that the last Manchester Airport renewal was taken on at a loss.
With Brum going (next year?), Gatwick possibly going, one could speculate (as is widely done among NSL staff) that NATS would love to sell off NSL. In the world that we live in today their overheads (go visit CTC at Whiteley) are pricing them out of an ever shrinking UK market. Whether their Iberian enterprise will save the day remains to be seen. There may be a future for NSL, but I sincerely doubt that it is the UK airports market.
"After all, it's well known in NATS that profits are almost completely driven by the airports side of the business.... Isn't it?" - unless anything has radically changed over the past two year the answer is "NO".
NATS is divided into two companies NATS Services (NSL) and NATS En-route (NERL). The real money spinner for NATS is NERL.
Since the last recession most (if not all) airport operators have been screwing NSL into the ground over costs, demanding more for less. Rumour has it in NATS that the last Manchester Airport renewal was taken on at a loss.
With Brum going (next year?), Gatwick possibly going, one could speculate (as is widely done among NSL staff) that NATS would love to sell off NSL. In the world that we live in today their overheads (go visit CTC at Whiteley) are pricing them out of an ever shrinking UK market. Whether their Iberian enterprise will save the day remains to be seen. There may be a future for NSL, but I sincerely doubt that it is the UK airports market.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is true the controllers the ATC operators employ will all have the same appropriate licences but that doesn't mean the service the operators deliver is the same.
If all you are interested in is the bottom line you will invariably get a second or even third rate service.
If all you are interested in is the bottom line you will invariably get a second or even third rate service.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A controller who might be a whizz-kid at one unit may not make it at another so all ATCOs are not alike. A controller who fails to make the grade at a busy unit may be perfect at somewhere quieter. I'm not saying that this has anything to do with Birmingham or Gatwick I am merely stating a fact for T250.