Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Shifts and rosters

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Shifts and rosters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Feb 2014, 11:11
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southampton,hampshire,england
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Western Radar [UK] 3 mornings [0615] 0630-1330, 3 afternoons 1330-2100, 3 days off. Mandatory excess hours working which accrues TOIL.
055166k is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2014, 18:52
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southampton
Age: 44
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How is it we recognise a. n. european state's license and give out a UK one, but won't do the same for someone leaving the RAF......?
jpwelton is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2014, 19:13
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southampton
Age: 44
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was aiming more rhetorical than actual enquiry!
jpwelton is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2014, 21:00
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know what things are like now but when I was operational, RAF ATC was totally different to civvy. I had experience of this at home and abroad. They had different priorities and it would not have been possible for a military controller to move straight to civvy ATC without training.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2014, 21:24
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There were some ex-RAF guys on my radar course. If you need a reason why they can't just change their licences over then I suggest you go and watch them doing the courses.
reportyourlevel is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2014, 22:31
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well said reportyourlevel!
NQWhy is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2014, 08:10
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southampton,hampshire,england
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LookingForAJob

I agree with you....absolutely. Your comments are accurate, and you are not alone....and I speak from many years OJT. Difficult to overcome the inertia of mil phraseology and technique....people who are "always right" need careful handling and understanding to assist transition to the ATC family rather than an "us and them" rank structure.
055166k is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2014, 20:56
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southampton
Age: 44
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I accept both the technical answer and (some of!) the practical ones - I have trained and worked alongside current and ex-service ATCOs. My point, I guess, is should we consider it right and proper that someone with experience of, for example, operating at multiple airfields with large variations in traffic types and mixes should have to start 'from scratch' to get a job once they leave Her Majesty's service? Should we not advocate at the very least some sort of fast track/streamlined course?
jpwelton is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2014, 21:13
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JP

on tower/approach possibly... particularly at places like bournemouth or cardiff which are a little more like mil airfields with a mix of traffic and not all non stop commercial jets. Heathrow/Gatwick different but the skills are a bit more transferable.

Area is completely different.

Fast track courses have been tried before and in the main did not work. Some of it was down to attitude... old and bold military controllers who thought they knew best and couldn't shut up and learn

Old and bold instructors who sometimes resented mil controllers joining.

Speaking as a someone on your watch who is ex mil and did tower/app and area in the mil before joining NATS. The area course was hard (for me) and I was supposedly a very good mil controller. I had to unlearn a lot of discrepancies to work the way the college needed me to.

Of course TC controlling is more akin to mil than pure area, so that helped on OJT which was, fortunately, much easier for me.
anotherthing is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 20:05
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wise words Vulcan Lover...
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 22:04
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South of England
Posts: 1,172
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If the situation were reversed, I could not visualise the military welcoming a civil controller with open arms and a rubber stamp!

2 s
2 sheds is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2014, 03:57
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't you need to pass a politeness test to be qualified as a civil ATCO?
llondel is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2014, 07:11
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vulcan Lover and HD;

You are correct, but I'm sure that if it was the other way round then plenty experienced civvy ATCO's would have the same attitude.

Part of the make up of an ATCO I think. You need to be a bit self assured to do the job well, and some people just can't reign themselves in and realise that the past experience is a bonus but nothing to harp on about. Just keep your head down, listen and you will learn something new, and your previous experience will shine through when it comes to real controlling and thinking on your feet.

As LookingForaJob says, the skills of a civvy ATCO do not mean they could just walk into a mil job. The nature of the flying etc means different set of problems and priorities. I seem to remember something in JSP 318 about controlling in the mil and one of the quotes was about the high likelihood of emergencies due to the way the aircraft are operated.

Both sets of controllers have their strong pints, but although ATC is ultimately about keeping aircraft apart, the job differs. I think that a good, level headed ex mil ATCO can enhance the course for fellow coursemates.

IMHO that's what used to be so good about NATS courses - you seemed to get a real mix of people on course a few years ago - and all their experiences, either as controllers or just in life, made the whole course more rounded
anotherthing is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2014, 12:24
  #34 (permalink)  
10W

PPRuNe Bashaholic
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: The Peoples Alcoholic Republic of Jockistan
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both sets of controllers have their strong pints,
Although with the Transport Act, and random Drugs & Alcohol testing, we can't do that on duty any more
10W is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.