Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Problems at Swanwick?

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Problems at Swanwick?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Dec 2013, 07:41
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An old one would be fine Gonzo, just so long as its separate.
Fran Tick is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 08:26
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm with you on the box clicking and menu madness HD, where the simplest of input or selection tasks can be reduced to a form filling nightmare, often with almost exactly the same sequence of multiple selections every time.

You'll eventually learn to remember the sequence from the continual practise, but reliance on rote means you may not notice when a slight distraction causes you to deviate. And aren't slight distractions everywhere in the modern open plan workplaces ?

The manufacturers think you're just 'stuck in your ways' when you try telling them, if you are old enough to recognise the difference.

Box ticking fatigue is an insidious and still largely unrecognised hazard of modern systems.
Fran Tick is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 08:29
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Poland
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An old one would be fine Gonzo, just so long as its separate.
Having two instances of the same system could save you from an upgrade fail which effects are clearly visible immediately after upgrade (a delayed problem would be harder to spot and to avoid this way, though), but most probably won't save you from bugs that are triggered by something from the outside - a badly formatted flight plan message, a faulty time server, or simply an error that just happens and is likely to happen at both instances.
samotnik is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 10:57
  #104 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gonzo
So you want a completely redundant VCCS function, to enable 100% capacity ops when the current one is degraded? You want to develop and maintain a new set of hardware, from a different manufacturer, with a completely independent update/upgrade cycle? A new software set up with another million lines of code? You want to design and develop new interfaces to all the related systems in adjacent FIRs?

Really?
And, of course, the controller side of the glass must look, act and feel exactly like the current operational system. Otherwise you will impose flow due to controller unfamiliarity with the 'new' backup system.

Having been closely involved in 'backroom' work at Swanwick this doesn't sound like the VCCS (Garrex) system that failed. Not having worked there for 2 years I'm not going to speculate further.
BDiONU is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 11:10
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: On a foreign shore trying a new wine diet. So far, I've lost 3days!
Age: 75
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's obvious what happened really. Scottish Mil move South, disgruntled Scot throws sporran in the works. Beware Burns Night!
On the beach is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 11:53
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HD,
We had a similar system on both the Mediator and later NODE suites at EGCC. Each telephone line was terminated at every position. When the sectors were split, you simply de-selected the ones you didn't need to answer. It worked splendidly for over 30 years.
Otb, loving your work.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 12:31
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks s.

<<Otherwise you will impose flow due to controller unfamiliarity with the 'new' backup system.>>

Don't know where that happens. When we moved into the new approach room at a large airfield we had had very little expereince of the hardware - quick shufty during breaks - so flow control was imposed. We put up with it for all ten minutes and then got the show on the road!
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 12:42
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That was back in the day HD. I know this a bit like apples and oranges BUT when we replaced our old voice switch for a new one I had to go to the factory with engineers and installers to do the acceptance tests for it.

When we installed it at my airfield there was a training plan ,practical demonstrations,hands on experience and a test before each operator ( ATCO and ATSA) was signed off.

SRG then came and "quality controlled" the whole thing BEFORE it was allowed to go live.

I tried...but the quick shufty option wasn't available to us.

Rather like the "eg" .....a thing of yesteryear (at my former airfield anyway)
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 13:26
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coincidence ?

While the integration of the ScotMil system that night might seem an entirely possible cause, it is often not the most plausible explanation that is the right one and is often much simpler. Coincidence does exist.
Fran Tick is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 13:36
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Out of the blue
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It used to be said of West Drayton, that there was a manhole in the street outside; where a single hand grenade would cripple the UK ATC network for a month.

Seems now a geek with a laptop in his bedroom could completely screw up the system with a couple of keystrokes.

Not to mention a foreign power with malicious intent.

The fancier they make the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain
Mr Scott - USS Enterprise
Mick Stability is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 13:37
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Register is claiming to have the inside track, quoting an un-named inside source, that it was on one of the Frequentis 3020(?) systems.
Fran Tick is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 15:30
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr

NATS blames touch screen tool for glitch | Air Traffic Management | Air Traffic Management - ATM and CMS Industry online, the latest air traffic control industry, CAA, ANSP, SESAR and NEXTGEN news, events, supplier directory and magazine
Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 15:49
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 759
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
HD,
On a visit to Visual at Heathrow a great many years ago, the finest piece of technology with a MTBF* measured in eons was the piece of guttering that took the Flight Strips from one end of the desk to the other ... Proof of the KISS principle!!

Back to the thread ...


* Mean Time Between Failure
FantomZorbin is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 16:12
  #114 (permalink)  
None but a blockhead
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London, UK
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know about coincidence. but when the system has been transitioning in and out of night mode for years without major incident and then goes down for 14 hours after a major reconfiguration, I know where I'd start looking...
Self Loading Freight is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 16:20
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FantomZorbin
the piece of guttering that took the Flight Strips from one end of the desk to the other
Ah, the chute! HD and I would like a penny for every time we shot that…

Back to the thread...
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 16:22
  #116 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HEATHROW DIRECTOR
<<Otherwise you will impose flow due to controller unfamiliarity with the 'new' backup system.>>

Don't know where that happens. When we moved into the new approach room at a large airfield we had had very little expereince of the hardware - quick shufty during breaks - so flow control was imposed. We put up with it for all ten minutes and then got the show on the road!
Good for you, but unfortunately doing things off the back of a fag packet isn't acceptable nowadays I was involved in the move of LAC and LTC from WD to Swanwick and the move of SCoACC and MACC into the new Prestwick Centre. Fairly major flows on each time.
BDiONU is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 17:00
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
" ... unfortunately doing things off the back of a fag packet isn't acceptable nowadays ... "
I hear it takes a method statement and a flight plan to be filed to pass wind these days at Swanwick.
Fran Tick is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 17:07
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was there indeed a major reconfiguration of the affected system ?
Fran Tick is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 17:15
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Retired to Leafy Bucks
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fran Tick
Was there indeed a major reconfiguration of the affected system ?
Since Scottish Mil will have needed a chunk of new connectivity to both the outside world and locally within Swanwick I think it is a fair punt that a large config change would have been needed. Changes to configs is one of the more likely causes of this type of failure as it is virtually impossible to test every possible combination that the new config can make available to the user.
goldfrog is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 17:28
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern England
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd want to know whether or not Scottish Mil are using VCS before I'd take that punt.

I'd love to see HD's technical solution in use at Swanwick. I suspect NATS might have to build some rather large walls to put all the switches on though.
eglnyt is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.