Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Does anyone know if there is a GOOD reason

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Does anyone know if there is a GOOD reason

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Apr 2013, 11:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: long island
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know if there is a GOOD reason

Yesterday I flew on United into KDCA and listened on ch9 (the ride report channel) and was struck by the overwhelming number of four digit call signs.

With mergers and flight cutbacks, I do not understand why 2 and 3 digit call signs have all but disappeared. If we are slave to puters, could it still not be possible to input 00 at the beginning of a 2 digit flight number?

It would seem to be far easier on controllers (not to mention old people taking three flights in a single day).
finfly1 is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2013, 12:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So are you suggesting that some callsigns could start with several zeros? Inputting leading zeros used to be possible but served little use. Often nowadays aircraft callsigns have a mix of numbers and letters, primarily to avoid callsign confusion when two flights occur at the same time with similar callsigns. Having used R/T for most of my working life I don't recall too much difficulty with callsigns whether they had one number or several, e.g. Clipper One through to Air Force 48913..
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2013, 13:37
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
I do not understand why 2 and 3 digit call signs have all but disappeared
Actually, the majority of United's own flights are 1-3 digit flight numbers, with the low ones being mainly used on high-profile routes (e.g. UAL5 LHR-IAD). However 4-digit flight numbers are invariably used by commuter carriers operating UAL flights, with each partner having its own range of numbers.

For example on DCA-ORD, UAL's Airbuses fly as UAL207, 265, 287, etc, but on the same route UAL3461, 3463 and so on are United Express (Shuttle America) Embraer 170s.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2013, 17:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just as an example, Air Canada has 1-3 digit flight numbers however their feeder airline, Jazz, has 4 digit flight numbers. In my experience, the 4 digit ones of US carries tend to typically be the feeders, not the mother ship.
LoserGill is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2013, 17:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Toronto
Age: 57
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To aid in reducing callsign confusion with Jazz flights, a couple of years ago, the 8 at the start of the flight number (and if the 8 were followed by a 0, the 0) was removed from the ATC callsign but not the flight number. JZA8029 became JZA29 and JZA8666 became JZA666.

Just have to get to grips with those starting with 7 now:

JZA 7779, 7797, 7739, 7793, 7939 etc.
cossack is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2013, 18:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: farfaraway
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HD

The mention of Clipper One brings back such great memories of times gone.
obwan is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2013, 19:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ireland
Posts: 221
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In Europe Eurocontrol from an ATC perspective have a project running to reduce callsign confusion.

The aim is where say an airline with callsigns AIRLINE-113 AIRLINE-123 and AIRLINE-133 all opereate in the same airspace then 2 will be changed.

Also they are looking at situations where AIRLINE1-333 and AIRLINE2-333 are also operating.

they are using a mix of alpha numeric callsigns and 3 or 4 digit to assist decluttering.

regards
confused atco is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2013, 19:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
obwan... indeed. I would love to be able to turn the clock back...
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2013, 20:02
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Asgard
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Then there was Sagittair zero zero one.

Raffles 1 springs to mind also....but back in those days 4 digit callsigns weren't exactly unknown....a lot of the BEA numbers had 4 IIRC.
Loki is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2013, 20:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speedbird 1, 2, 3 and 4 doesn't have quite the same thrill as it used to, and similarly Air France 001 and 002.
5milesbaby is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2013, 20:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 336
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did once suggest that 4 figure callsigns should be pronounced as two numbers - eg "fifty one, fifty three" or "forty four, forty four" but the idea fell on fallow ground.
scotbill is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2013, 00:35
  #12 (permalink)  
Vercingetorix
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Clipper One
The one that got stuck in the mud one evening while taxying to the runway for take off at EGLL!!
 
Old 5th Apr 2013, 10:40
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 538
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Did once suggest that 4 figure callsigns should be pronounced as two numbers - eg "fifty one, fifty three" or "forty four, forty four" but the idea fell on fallow ground.
Flight Number callsigns in Oz use this format. For 3 numbers e.g. 412, we say four twelve.
topdrop is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2013, 13:55
  #14 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In Europe Eurocontrol from an ATC perspective have a project running to reduce callsign confusion.
There was some work done in the UK - a good few years ago now - but I think a lot of it is probably still relevant. I think it was published as CAP704.
 
Old 5th Apr 2013, 19:01
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I say that instead of numbers, use names

...

Last edited by LoserGill; 5th Apr 2013 at 19:02.
LoserGill is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2013, 05:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New York Tracon
Age: 57
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clipper One memories!
N90-EWR is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.