Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Does anyone know if there is a GOOD reason

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Does anyone know if there is a GOOD reason

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th April 2013 | 11:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 317
Likes: 2
From: long island
Does anyone know if there is a GOOD reason

Yesterday I flew on United into KDCA and listened on ch9 (the ride report channel) and was struck by the overwhelming number of four digit call signs.

With mergers and flight cutbacks, I do not understand why 2 and 3 digit call signs have all but disappeared. If we are slave to puters, could it still not be possible to input 00 at the beginning of a 2 digit flight number?

It would seem to be far easier on controllers (not to mention old people taking three flights in a single day).
finfly1 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2013 | 12:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,266
Likes: 1
From: Berkshire, UK
So are you suggesting that some callsigns could start with several zeros? Inputting leading zeros used to be possible but served little use. Often nowadays aircraft callsigns have a mix of numbers and letters, primarily to avoid callsign confusion when two flights occur at the same time with similar callsigns. Having used R/T for most of my working life I don't recall too much difficulty with callsigns whether they had one number or several, e.g. Clipper One through to Air Force 48913..
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2013 | 13:37
  #3 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,688
Likes: 2,030
From: Reading, UK
I do not understand why 2 and 3 digit call signs have all but disappeared
Actually, the majority of United's own flights are 1-3 digit flight numbers, with the low ones being mainly used on high-profile routes (e.g. UAL5 LHR-IAD). However 4-digit flight numbers are invariably used by commuter carriers operating UAL flights, with each partner having its own range of numbers.

For example on DCA-ORD, UAL's Airbuses fly as UAL207, 265, 287, etc, but on the same route UAL3461, 3463 and so on are United Express (Shuttle America) Embraer 170s.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2013 | 17:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Just as an example, Air Canada has 1-3 digit flight numbers however their feeder airline, Jazz, has 4 digit flight numbers. In my experience, the 4 digit ones of US carries tend to typically be the feeders, not the mother ship.
LoserGill is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2013 | 17:45
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 535
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
To aid in reducing callsign confusion with Jazz flights, a couple of years ago, the 8 at the start of the flight number (and if the 8 were followed by a 0, the 0) was removed from the ATC callsign but not the flight number. JZA8029 became JZA29 and JZA8666 became JZA666.

Just have to get to grips with those starting with 7 now:

JZA 7779, 7797, 7739, 7793, 7939 etc.
cossack is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2013 | 18:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: farfaraway
HD

The mention of Clipper One brings back such great memories of times gone.
obwan is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2013 | 19:02
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 230
Likes: 1
From: ireland
In Europe Eurocontrol from an ATC perspective have a project running to reduce callsign confusion.

The aim is where say an airline with callsigns AIRLINE-113 AIRLINE-123 and AIRLINE-133 all opereate in the same airspace then 2 will be changed.

Also they are looking at situations where AIRLINE1-333 and AIRLINE2-333 are also operating.

they are using a mix of alpha numeric callsigns and 3 or 4 digit to assist decluttering.

regards
confused atco is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2013 | 19:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,266
Likes: 1
From: Berkshire, UK
obwan... indeed. I would love to be able to turn the clock back...
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2013 | 20:02
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Asgard
Then there was Sagittair zero zero one.

Raffles 1 springs to mind also....but back in those days 4 digit callsigns weren't exactly unknown....a lot of the BEA numbers had 4 IIRC.
Loki is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2013 | 20:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
From: Greystation
Speedbird 1, 2, 3 and 4 doesn't have quite the same thrill as it used to, and similarly Air France 001 and 002.
5milesbaby is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2013 | 20:57
  #11 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 341
Likes: 4
From: Glasgow
Did once suggest that 4 figure callsigns should be pronounced as two numbers - eg "fifty one, fifty three" or "forty four, forty four" but the idea fell on fallow ground.
scotbill is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2013 | 00:35
  #12 (permalink)  
Vercingetorix
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Clipper One
The one that got stuck in the mud one evening while taxying to the runway for take off at EGLL!!
 
Reply
Old 5th April 2013 | 10:40
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 538
Likes: 1
From: Oz
Did once suggest that 4 figure callsigns should be pronounced as two numbers - eg "fifty one, fifty three" or "forty four, forty four" but the idea fell on fallow ground.
Flight Number callsigns in Oz use this format. For 3 numbers e.g. 412, we say four twelve.
topdrop is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2013 | 13:55
  #14 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In Europe Eurocontrol from an ATC perspective have a project running to reduce callsign confusion.
There was some work done in the UK - a good few years ago now - but I think a lot of it is probably still relevant. I think it was published as CAP704.
 
Reply
Old 5th April 2013 | 19:01
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Canada
I say that instead of numbers, use names

...

Last edited by LoserGill; 5th April 2013 at 19:02.
LoserGill is offline  
Reply
Old 6th April 2013 | 05:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: New York Tracon
Clipper One memories!
N90-EWR is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.