Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Longitudinal Separation under radar control?

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Longitudinal Separation under radar control?

Old 6th Dec 2012, 08:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SI
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Longitudinal Separation under radar control?

Hi,
could please anyone clarify me the required longitudinal separation between aircrafts in cruise flying the same track when under radar control?
(A reference will be greatly appreciated)
Thanks.
RunSick is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 09:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
5nm enroute, 3nm approach

Doc 4444, implemented in whatever countries local documents. MATS in the case of Australia
mikethepomme is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 09:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London FIR
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For the UK, have a look here:

http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP493Part1cor.pdf

CAP 493 - Manual Of Air Traffic Services (MATS), Part 1.

Section 1 (Air Traffic Services)
Chapter 3 (Separation Standards)

It doesn't give much away as it would ultimately be laid down in the controlling unit's MATS Part 2, or in the case of the Military. Military Manual of Air Traffic Management (MMATM).

AFAIR its 5nm in most places and some areas its increased to 10nm because of radar coverage.

I hope that helps.

MM
Monkey Madness is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 10:44
  #4 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It's not set down as a longitudinal (or anything else) separation when using radar - aircraft are just kept apart by a minimum distance. The standard is 5 NM but in areas of poor radar cover or if the aircraft is a long way from the radar head the distance might be increased, sometimes the increase might be in the lateral plane only because the positional accuracy of the return is reduced in such circumstances - for the old timers amongst us this is saying much the same as 'the blips get huge!'
 
Old 6th Dec 2012, 10:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are lots of separation standards used around the world depending on equipment and circumstances. We use 3, 5, 8 and 16nm in our airspace, depending on which radars we are using and what mode of radar display is being used. But you'd be a brave/stupid controller to use 5nm behind an A380 or B757 in the cruise; never forget wake turbulence separation. You'll get complaints from some pilots even when you are applying the required minimum separation if they feel the bumps.
ATCO1962 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 11:33
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
soaringhigh650 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 11:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Okay that was VATSIM, but it is based off AIM Chapter 3 Section 2 (Controlled Airspace) and the FAA Order JO 7110.65U
soaringhigh650 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 16:51
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regardless of the required separation, spacing in the cruise will also be governed by intra and inter-unit agreements. Even if, say, 5nm can be used within a unit, you will usually find a larger in-trail spacing is required between units (or sectors within a unit). This can be 10nm, 20nm, 30nm etc. (or anything) and is the usual determinant when setting up longitudinal spacing in the cruise.
ferris is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 18:58
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SI
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thatīs great guys, thanks to all of you for the answers and references.
RunSick is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.