Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Separation in a non-radar approach environment

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Separation in a non-radar approach environment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Mar 2012, 13:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Separation in a non-radar approach environment

Hi

I'm looking for information regarding procedural separation in a non-radar approach environment. I'm aware of all the various methods described in Doc 4444 and Mats Part 1. What i'm really interested in is Geographical separation or "deemed separation". As these are different for each airfield and are only available in Mats part 2 i believe. Interested in responses from all countries. What is allowed at your unit? Anyone any experience in methods used to separate departures against an arrival who will fly a dme arc leading to final approach?

PM me if you wish

Thanks

SC
Sky Conductor is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2012, 13:30
  #2 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In my experience geographic separation is usually used for flights operating visually and can be really useful for handling Special VFR flights - clearance such as one aircraft holding to the E of one point and another to the W of another point can be used to ensure the aircraft are never closer than the distance between the two points (I hope I don't need to draw a picture to show the relative positions of the points and aircraft!).

Deemed separation can be used for both visual and instrument flights and is applied when there is no suitable (or convenient) separation in Doc 4444 but the relevant authority is content that either there's no possibility that the aeroplanes will bang into each other or it satisfies some legal nicety (c.f. aircraft inside CAS are deemed separated from those outside CAS).

Certainly used this way in the past in the UK and I've seen similar principles applied elsewhere.
 
Old 21st Mar 2012, 04:32
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone any experience in methods used to separate departures against an arrival who will fly a dme arc leading to final approach?
Yes.

Basrah Airport, in the south of Iraq. We have a waypoint (WOGET) which is the IAF for a DME arc leading to both the ILS 32 and VOR approach 14. The waypoint is 15 DME from the VOR (which is on the Airport) at 90 degrees to the runway axis. There is a hold associated with the waypoint.

Traffic departing 14 or 32 is deemed separated from traffic either holding at WOGET or inbound to the same runway as the departure, established on the arc, PROVIDED the departure flies runway heading until vertical separation is achieved.

Hope this helps

Last edited by Chilli Monster; 21st Mar 2012 at 05:40.
Chilli Monster is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2012, 08:10
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Spitoon. Yes we use the one east/one west all the time for Special VFR's

Yes Chilli that is exactly what i'm looking for. Check PM.

Doc 4444 (ICAO - Air Traffic Management) 5.4.1.2.1.2.1 states:
When aircraft are operating on tracks which are separated by considerbly more than the foregoing minimum figures, States may reduce the distance at which lateral separation is achieved.

I know they are dont come under ICAO but I believe in the US that NDB separation is right down to 6nm if the tracks are 90 degrees apart rather that 15nm and 30 degrees. This or similiar apply to anyone else?
Sky Conductor is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2012, 11:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Slovakia
Age: 65
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Usually, deemed separation is established when the ICAO Pans-Ops obstacle protection areas do not overlap. Procedurally separated holding patterns are when the primary obstacle protection areas for the holdings do not overlap.
rennaps is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 02:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: at the computer
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
NZ VOR or RNAV tracking minimum lateral sep is 24 degrees and 8nm up to A100

Provided an aircraft is contained on a visual app or an instrument app an aircraft may depart into a sector separated by 45* from the arrival area (Aircraft's present track to final app track) until the arriving aircraft is within 3 mins from the airfield. This may be used when the arriving aircraft is making a base turn approach from the overhead provided the aircraft has reported established outbound.
1Charlie is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2012, 22:15
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mercer Island WA
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RNP Based Procedures - best choice and path to future

Consider adopting modern RNP based procedures for traffic separation. They have been used successfully now for well over a decade, in several states in particular, even for far more critical terrain separation. RNP is also used internationally, at higher RNP levels, such as for oceanic and remote area traffic separation. If you have suitable fractions of FMS RTA equipped aircraft operating at the relevant airfields, or regions, use of RTA in conjunction with 3D RNP procedures can also help.

Regards,
ti
7478ti is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.