Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

controllers in the cockpit

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

controllers in the cockpit

Old 2nd Mar 2012, 17:21
  #1 (permalink)  
l39
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: acc
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
controllers in the cockpit

Dear All,
I am curious how many of you have a program or smth.. for controllers to fly in the cockpit "jump seat" and if you have such program, do you find it useful?
I am working in eastern Europe as an enroute , and we had such practice about 10 years ago, but it never reached program`s goal.
Now I think it`s time we did it again on a different basis.
L 39
l39 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2012, 17:35
  #2 (permalink)  
PPRuNe supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Controllers are only as good as the training they receive, but in my opinion, flight deck observations don't accomplish a lot, I think it's much more beneficial for pilots to visit ATC facilities.
Dream Land is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2012, 17:56
  #3 (permalink)  
l39
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: acc
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In fact, both pilots and controllers get to see how the other half works.. I think it would be beneficial. There's some ability for both sides to learn from the other. For us : the operations of the aircraft, the procedures, watching what they do, how equipment works, how the air traffic control system works..and, as for them..a lot !
l39 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2012, 18:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I always found familiarisation flights very beneficial and was always made very welcome on all the flight-decks I had the pleasure to travel on. - Especially the 2 gentleman who thought I was a CAA Flight-OPS inspector and were visibly relieved when I said I was ATCO. These trips were also counted as 'duty time' when I first joined ATC.
It was always a pleasure, and very informative, to have pilots 'plugged in' with us on various ATC positions. Always great to welcome people in 'big hats' into the ops-room. Sadly, distraction policy often forbids this today.
We also had many 'pilot-controller forums'. Informal get-togethers at a pub near the airport where new and existing procedures could be discussed and faces put to voices, over a curry or hot-pot supper. This is difficult today as most of the U.K's area and approach-radar controllers now work in locations far-away from where most pilots (commercial or private), are based.
Fortunately where I worked, we also had a hill-walking group which involved both ATCOs, ATSAs and aircrew. Many issues were discussed on the fells of northern England, and the results of these discussions cascaded down, (oops, sorry, management-speak), to other staff.
Sadly, today, accountants, (and others who administer, but are no longer, or, even worse, never have been, at 'the sharp end'), have forgotten, or do not understand the benefits of 'Famil'.
A shame.

Last edited by ZOOKER; 2nd Mar 2012 at 20:18.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2012, 18:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Zurich
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did about 38 "fam" flights before they were banned after 09/11. Truly some of the best training ever completed. Several times encountered thunderstorms and got to see first hand what the pilots were looking at before they requested deviations. Fully learned to understand the difference between "light chop" and moderate turbulence. Saw St Elmo's fire come thru the wind screen, and encountered a lightning strick on a flight out of Phoenix. Was in the cockpit when we had a medical emergency with a passenger in the back, and was utilized by the crew to read the charts and procedures for the nearest airport we had to land at for assistance. It truly gave me an appreciation of what the pilots go through on their end and develop a a kinship with those "voices" in the headset. ATC and pilots are both in the business of safe, orderly and expeditious flow of air traffic, and I always felt that those who never got to experience this privelege never would truly understand the close relationship between controllers and pilots, and also how fragile that relationship can truly be.
atc_chopper is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2012, 19:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ukraine
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In Ukraine we have such flights in cockpit almost every year with domestic airlines (but it's not obligatory). Good thing to understand crew's workload during each phase of flight. And to explain why we sometimes have to do things, pilots don't like.
TC_Ukraine is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2012, 21:15
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Working in a german airline we are allowed to let any german ATCO travel up front, however it happens only very very rarely that one asks. They don't seem to travel all that often
Denti is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2012, 23:08
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've done several fam flights in the cockpit, and have always found them to be highly useful and a valuable learning experience, especially when I was training.

I learnt a lot about what the pilots do, and, importantly, what the aircraft can and cannot do. There's no point me giving the aircraft an instruction if it's not capable of doing it.

I also agree that it's a good idea for pilots to come into the control centre to see what we do. Visiting the 'other side' of the microphone gives much better understanding of the other's role.
jackieofalltrades is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2012, 09:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the way to sea
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we practice this quite a lot. and offer pilots sim rides on our simulators too
kontrolor is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2012, 09:54
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: up the road
Age: 54
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course they are beneficial, if they sit in the cockpit as oppose to Seat 1A like the ORD controllers must have. Those guys have no appreciation of what a late change of runway/approach involves in a modern jet, assuming one was to follow his/her airline's robust SOPs.
jacquesbernis is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2012, 18:29
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Down South
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having done a couple of fam flights on the jumpseat I agree that they're certainly beneficial. It allows us controllers to see what goes on at certain points of the flight, the workloads that the pilots have and so on.

On the flip side, it's equally useful for pilots to visit ATC, preferably as many phases of the operation as possible. It would allow us to explain why things happen the way they do, why you end up on a heading when you can see nothing on TCAS (I'm looking at you, KLM pilots into Cardiff and Bristol ), why you might get step climbs etc and just generally increases the understanding.

NATS has finally started pushing fam flights a bit more, they've always been available, but for some reason they've been promoting them a bit more as part of our annual TRUCE training
The Many Tentacles is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2012, 21:56
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: FZFG
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Been jump-seating a few times lately, and I found every second of those flights useful for my job. It really helps you provide a better service.

I wish we had more pilots visiting ATC units as well, that would really make the difference.
mebur_verce is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2012, 08:48
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I totally agree that Fam Flights for Controllers and Liason visits for Pilots are essential to enable both parties to fully understand the probems that we face. Post 9/11 it became practically impossible to arrange fam flights and because many ATC Towers are now located airside it is often difficult for pilots to visit ATC.
I personally think that these liason arrangements should take place in duty time. I have never felt that either a fam flight or liason visit has been a waste time; there has always been a sharing of knowledge and undertsanding that can only benefit the industry as a whole.
Jester Wester is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2012, 09:38
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: LHR
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did about 38 "fam" flights before they were banned after 09/11. Truly some of the best training ever completed. Several times encountered thunderstorms and got to see first hand what the pilots were looking at before they requested deviations. Fully learned to understand the difference between "light chop" and moderate turbulence. Saw St Elmo's fire come thru the wind screen, and encountered a lightning strick on a flight out of Phoenix. Was in the cockpit when we had a medical emergency with a passenger in the back, and was utilized by the crew to read the charts and procedures for the nearest airport we had to land at for assistance
You got several thunderstorms recquiring deviation, moderate turbulence, St Elmos fire, a lightning strike AND a medical emergency in 38 sectors? Were the pilots looking for trouble? It's rare I get ONE of those events a month.
HPbleed is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2015, 12:41
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Zurich
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not 38 sectors but over 38 flights when I was in the jumpseat. And yes, I thought I was rather fortunate to see all that
atc_chopper is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2015, 16:08
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Up North
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You certainly made him wait for an answer.
Radar Contact Lost is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2015, 06:47
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mauritius,soon or latter
Posts: 539
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my times it wasn't official,but it was allowed tom enter cockpit and many people did it.
Personally, i entered ATC door via pilot door so I had idea what is going on in cockpit .
But one day Falcon 50 (YU BNA ) arrived at my airfield. don't miss it !

I tried at least 40 types of a/c ( both as PIC and SLF ) . But nothing compares with Falcon.
Outside Temperature over 40, 11 person on board and 4500 ft/min initial climb with 96 % of power.

apart from unique flying experience I have an opportunity to see how well trained and highest possible SOP works . N.b. YU BNA is state a/c for highest level of officials ( that particular day on board were lower level delegation-that explains my entrance )
forever in my mind.
SINGAPURCANAC is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2015, 10:14
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,799
Received 90 Likes on 63 Posts
I had some great fam flights before 9/11 spoiled it for us. If you booked with someone like Britannia (aka Thomsonfly) you were guaranteed the jump seat so they could still sell the seat in the cabin which you would otherwise occupy.
One flight, Gatwick - Malaga with BA, we were just starting descent into Malaga; I was positive I heard ATC clear us to descend to FL110, captain was on the cabin PA and I heard F/O readback FL100. I thought I'd better mention this so F/O asked the captain (who'd been pre-occupied); he asked ATC who said 'FL160' in a rather terse tone of voice!(ie emphasising the '6')
Captain remarked 'that sort of thing often happens around here'.
chevvron is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2015, 11:44
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Róisín Dubh
Posts: 1,389
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
I've done a few, very beneficial. I'm ACS though, I think APS and TWR, especially ground movements, would benefit more. Ryanair have been offering us fam flights alot lately. Given their lack of ACARS etc, I'd be very interested to see their workload, combined with the higher workloads involved just by flying to some of their destinations; class G, non precision procedural approaches, like going back in time 40 years
Una Due Tfc is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2015, 16:19
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the rain
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know it's an old thread but it's still worth something... I very very firmly believe it should be mandatory for all pilots and controllers to spend 1 day a year observing each others "offices"

I am regularly horrified at the way pilot colleagues whinge and moan about controllers without having the first idea about how the airspace works and what pressures said controllers have. That said I still sigh when told to slow down and go down ... both should really know better.

In today's modern crowded airspace we really are one team. It is imperative that both sides have a decent understanding of each others jobs. I would happily take controllers flying but the nation in which my aircraft are registered has decided flight decks should be impossible to get into without 12 miles of red tape.
babotika is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.